Literature DB >> 19737245

Pulse variations of a conducted energy weapon (similar to the TASER X26 device): effects on muscle contraction and threshold for ventricular fibrillation*.

Charles W Beason1, James R Jauchem, C D Clark, James E Parker, David A Fines.   

Abstract

Conducted energy weapons (such as the Advanced TASER X26 model produced by TASER International), incapacitate individuals by causing muscle contractions. To provide information relevant to development of future potential devices, a "Modifiable Electronic Stimulator" was used to evaluate the effects of changing various parameters of the stimulating pulse. Muscle contraction was affected by pulse power, net/gross charge, pulse duration, and pulse repetition frequency. The contraction force increased linearly as each of these factors was increased. Elimination of a precursor pulse from X26-like pulses did not have a significant effect on the normalized force measured. Muscle-contraction force increased as the spacing increased from 5 to 20 cm, with no further change in force above 20 cm of spacing. Therefore, it is suggested that any future developments of new conducted energy weapons should include placement of electrodes a minimum of 20 cm apart so that efficiency of the system is not degraded. In the current study, the 50% probability of fibrillation level of X26-like pulses ranged from 4 to 5 times higher than the X26 itself. Relatively large variations about the X26 operating level were found not to result in fibrillation or asystole. Therefore, it should be possible to design and build an X26-type device that operates efficiently at levels higher than the X26.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19737245     DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01129.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Forensic Sci        ISSN: 0022-1198            Impact factor:   1.832


  7 in total

1.  Conducted electrical weapon incapacitation during a goal-directed task as a function of probe spread.

Authors:  Jeffrey Ho; Donald Dawes; James Miner; Sebastian Kunz; Rebecca Nelson; James Sweeney
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 2.007

Review 2.  Repeated or long-duration TASER electronic control device exposures: acidemia and lack of respiration.

Authors:  James R Jauchem
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.007

3.  An evaluation of two conducted electrical weapons and two probe designs using a swine comparative cardiac safety model.

Authors:  Donald Murray Dawes; Jeffrey D Ho; Johanna C Moore; James R Miner
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 2.007

4.  An evaluation of two conducted electrical weapons using a swine comparative cardiac safety model.

Authors:  Donald M Dawes; Jeffrey D Ho; Johanna C Moore; Andrew P Laudenbach; Robert F Reardon; James R Miner
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 2.007

5.  Effects of a TASER® conducted energy weapon on the circulating red-blood-cell population and other factors in Sus scrofa.

Authors:  James R Jauchem; Joshua A Bernhard; Cesario Z Cerna; Tiffany Y Lim; Ronald L Seaman; Melissa Tarango
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 2.007

6.  Physiological effects of the TASER C2 conducted energy weapon.

Authors:  James R Jauchem; Ronald L Seaman; Curtis M Klages
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 2.007

7.  Acute effects of an alternative electronic-control-device waveform in swine.

Authors:  James Jauchem; Charles W Beason; Michael C Cook
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 2.007

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.