Literature DB >> 19733604

Potency values from the local lymph node assay: application to classification, labelling and risk assessment.

S E Loveless1, A-M Api, R W R Crevel, E Debruyne, A Gamer, I R Jowsey, P Kern, I Kimber, L Lea, P Lloyd, Z Mehmood, W Steiling, G Veenstra, M Woolhiser, C Hennes.   

Abstract

Hundreds of chemicals are contact allergens but there remains a need to identify and characterise accurately skin sensitising hazards. The purpose of this review was fourfold. First, when using the local lymph node assay (LLNA), consider whether an exposure concentration (EC3 value) lower than 100% can be defined and used as a threshold criterion for classification and labelling. Second, is there any reason to revise the recommendation of a previous ECETOC Task Force regarding specific EC3 values used for sub-categorisation of substances based upon potency? Third, what recommendations can be made regarding classification and labelling of preparations under GHS? Finally, consider how to integrate LLNA data into risk assessment and provide a rationale for using concentration responses and corresponding no-effect concentrations. Although skin sensitising chemicals having high EC3 values may represent only relatively low risks to humans, it is not possible currently to define an EC3 value below 100% that would serve as an appropriate threshold for classification and labelling. The conclusion drawn from reviewing the use of distinct categories for characterising contact allergens was that the most appropriate, science-based classification of contact allergens according to potency is one in which four sub-categories are identified: 'extreme', 'strong', 'moderate' and 'weak'. Since draining lymph node cell proliferation is related causally and quantitatively to potency, LLNA EC3 values are recommended for determination of a no expected sensitisation induction level that represents the first step in quantitative risk assessment. 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19733604     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.08.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  10 in total

1.  Irritancy and allergic responses induced by exposure to the indoor air chemical 4-oxopentanal.

Authors:  Stacey E Anderson; Jennifer Franko; Laurel G Jackson; J R Wells; Jason E Ham; B J Meade
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Evaluation of furfuryl alcohol sensitization potential following dermal and pulmonary exposure: enhancement of airway responsiveness.

Authors:  Jennifer Franko; Laurel G Jackson; Ann Hubbs; Michael Kashon; B J Meade; Stacey E Anderson
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 3.  Adaptation in the innate immune system and heterologous innate immunity.

Authors:  Stefan F Martin
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 4.  Methyl methacrylate and respiratory sensitization: a critical review.

Authors:  Jonathan Borak; Cheryl Fields; Larry S Andrews; Mark A Pemberton
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.635

5.  Immune stimulation following dermal exposure to unsintered indium tin oxide.

Authors:  Kristie Brock; Stacey E Anderson; Ewa Lukomska; Carrie Long; Katie Anderson; Nikki Marshall; B Jean Meade
Journal:  J Immunotoxicol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 6.  [Toxicological risk assessment using the example of potential contact sensitization to resorcinol].

Authors:  C Goebel; M Kock; H Merk
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 7.  Non-animal methods to predict skin sensitization (II): an assessment of defined approaches *.

Authors:  Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Sebastian Hoffmann; Nathalie Alépée; David Allen; Takao Ashikaga; Warren Casey; Elodie Clouet; Magalie Cluzel; Bertrand Desprez; Nichola Gellatly; Carsten Göbel; Petra S Kern; Martina Klaric; Jochen Kühnl; Silvia Martinozzi-Teissier; Karsten Mewes; Masaaki Miyazawa; Judy Strickland; Erwin van Vliet; Qingda Zang; Dirk Petersohn
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 5.635

8.  The LLNA: A Brief Review of Recent Advances and Limitations.

Authors:  Stacey E Anderson; Paul D Siegel; B J Meade
Journal:  J Allergy (Cairo)       Date:  2011-06-16

9.  The GARDpotency Assay for Potency-Associated Subclassification of Chemical Skin Sensitizers-Rationale, Method Development, and Ring Trial Results of Predictive Performance and Reproducibility.

Authors:  Robin Gradin; Angelica Johansson; Andy Forreryd; Emil Aaltonen; Anders Jerre; Olivia Larne; Ulrika Mattson; Henrik Johansson
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Characterizing Adduct Formation of Electrophilic Skin Allergens with Human Serum Albumin and Hemoglobin.

Authors:  Lorena Ndreu; Luke N Erber; Margareta Törnqvist; Natalia Y Tretyakova; Isabella Karlsson
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.739

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.