Literature DB >> 19733408

Dosimetric consequences of uncorrected setup errors in helical Tomotherapy treatments of breast-cancer patients.

S Murty Goddu1, Sridhar Yaddanapudi, Olga L Pechenaya, Summer R Chaudhari, Eric E Klein, Divya Khullar, Issam El Naqa, Sasa Mutic, Sasha Wahab, Lakshmi Santanam, Imran Zoberi, Daniel A Low.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The Tomotherapy Hi-Art II system allows acquisition of pre-treatment MVCT images to correct patient position. This work evaluates the dosimetric impact of uncorrected setup errors in breast-cancer radiation therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Breast-cancer patient-positioning errors were simulated by shifting the patient computed-tomography (CT) dataset relative to the planned photon fluence and re-computing the dose distributions. To properly evaluate the superficial region, film measurements were compared against the Tomotherapy treatment planning system (TPS) calculations. A simulation of the integrated dose distribution was performed to evaluate the setup error impact over the course of treatment.
RESULTS: Significant dose differences were observed for 11-mm shifts in the anterolateral and 3-mm shifts in the posteromedial directions. The results of film measurements in the superficial region showed that the TPS overestimated the dose by 14% at a 1-mm depth, improving to 3% at depths >or=5mm. Significant dose reductions in PTV were observed in the dose distributions simulated over the course of treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Tomotherapy's rotational delivery provides sufficient photon fluence extending beyond the skin surface to allow an up to 7-mm uncorrected setup error in the anterolateral direction. However, the steep dose falloff that conforms to the lung surface leads to compromised dose distributions with uncorrected posteromedial shifts. Therefore, daily image guidance and consequent patient repositioning is warranted for breast-cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19733408     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  9 in total

1.  Rotational output and beam quality evaluations for helical tomotherapy with use of a third-party quality assurance tool.

Authors:  Hidetoshi Shimizu; Koji Sasaki; Manabu Iwata; Minoru Kawai; Kuniyasu Nakashima; Takashi Kubota; Hikaru Osaki; Masashi Nakayama; Manabu Yoshimoto; Takeshi Kodaira
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2015-08-23

2.  An image-guided study of setup reproducibility of postmastectomy breast cancer patients treated with inverse-planned intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Christine H Feng; Emily Gerry; Steven J Chmura; Yasmin Hasan; Hania A Al-Hallaq
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Impact of Interfractional Error on Dosiomic Features.

Authors:  Chanon Puttanawarut; Nat Sirirutbunkajorn; Narisara Tawong; Suphalak Khachonkham; Poompis Pattaranutaporn; Yodchanan Wongsawat
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  A case report of total skin photon radiation therapy for cutaneous epitheliotropic lymphoma in a dog.

Authors:  Michael A Deveau; Megan Sutton; Courtney Baetge; Alison B Diesel
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Replacing Manual Planning of Whole Breast Irradiation With Knowledge-Based Automatic Optimization by Virtual Tangential-Fields Arc Therapy.

Authors:  Roberta Castriconi; Pier Giorgio Esposito; Alessia Tudda; Paola Mangili; Sara Broggi; Andrei Fodor; Chiara L Deantoni; Barbara Longobardi; Marcella Pasetti; Lucia Perna; Antonella Del Vecchio; Nadia Gisella Di Muzio; Claudio Fiorino
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Dosimetric Effects of the Interfraction Variations during Whole Breast Radiotherapy: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Julian Jacob; Steve Heymann; Isabelle Borget; Isabelle Dumas; Elyes Riahi; Pierre Maroun; Patrick Ezra; Elena Roberti; Sofia Rivera; Eric Deutsch; Céline Bourgier
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  A retrospective tomotherapy image-guidance study: analysis of more than 9,000 MVCT scans for ten different tumor sites.

Authors:  Patricia Sánchez-Rubio; Ruth Rodríguez-Romero; Pablo Castro-Tejero
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Clinical outcomes and dosimetric study of hypofractionated Helical TomoTherapy in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Imjai Chitapanarux; Wannapha Nobnop; Damrongsak Tippanya; Patumrat Sripan; Somvilai Chakrabandhu; Pitchayaponne Klunklin; Wimrak Onchan; Bongkot Jia-Mahasap; Ekkasit Tharavichitkul
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Does the protocol-required uniform margin around the CTV adequately account for setup inaccuracies in whole breast irradiation?

Authors:  Jurui Luo; Zhihai Yin; Zhen Zhang; Xiaomao Guo; Xiaoli Yu; Juanqi Wang
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 3.481

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.