| Literature DB >> 19731382 |
Domenico Cozzetto1, Andriy Kryshtafovych2, Krzysztof Fidelis2, John Moult3, Burkhard Rost4, Anna Tramontano1,5.
Abstract
The strategy for evaluating template-based models submitted to CASP has continuously evolved from CASP1 to CASP5, leading to a standard procedure that has been used in all subsequent editions. The established approach includes methods for calculating the quality of each individual model, for assigning scores based on the distribution of the results for each target and for computing the statistical significance of the differences in scores between prediction methods. These data are made available to the assessor of the template-based modeling category, who uses them as a starting point for further evaluations and analyses. This article describes the detailed workflow of the procedure, provides justifications for a number of choices that are customarily made for CASP data evaluation, and reports the results of the analysis of template-based predictions at CASP8. Copyright 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19731382 PMCID: PMC4589151 DOI: 10.1002/prot.22561
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proteins ISSN: 0887-3585