Literature DB >> 19731382

Evaluation of template-based models in CASP8 with standard measures.

Domenico Cozzetto1, Andriy Kryshtafovych2, Krzysztof Fidelis2, John Moult3, Burkhard Rost4, Anna Tramontano1,5.   

Abstract

The strategy for evaluating template-based models submitted to CASP has continuously evolved from CASP1 to CASP5, leading to a standard procedure that has been used in all subsequent editions. The established approach includes methods for calculating the quality of each individual model, for assigning scores based on the distribution of the results for each target and for computing the statistical significance of the differences in scores between prediction methods. These data are made available to the assessor of the template-based modeling category, who uses them as a starting point for further evaluations and analyses. This article describes the detailed workflow of the procedure, provides justifications for a number of choices that are customarily made for CASP data evaluation, and reports the results of the analysis of template-based predictions at CASP8. Copyright 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19731382      PMCID: PMC4589151          DOI: 10.1002/prot.22561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  22 in total

1.  MaxSub: an automated measure for the assessment of protein structure prediction quality.

Authors:  N Siew; A Elofsson; L Rychlewski; D Fischer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Analysis and assessment of comparative modeling predictions in CASP4.

Authors:  A Tramontano; R Leplae; V Morea
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001

3.  MAMMOTH (matching molecular models obtained from theory): an automated method for model comparison.

Authors:  Angel R Ortiz; Charlie E M Strauss; Osvaldo Olmea
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-12-01

5.  Assessment of fold recognition predictions in CASP6.

Authors:  Guoli Wang; Yumi Jin; Roland L Dunbrack
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005

6.  The other 90% of the protein: assessment beyond the Calphas for CASP8 template-based and high-accuracy models.

Authors:  Daniel A Keedy; Christopher J Williams; Jeffrey J Headd; W Bryan Arendall; Vincent B Chen; Gary J Kapral; Robert A Gillespie; Jeremy N Block; Adam Zemla; David C Richardson; Jane S Richardson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009

7.  A critical assessment of comparative molecular modeling of tertiary structures of proteins.

Authors:  S Mosimann; R Meleshko; M N James
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1995-11

8.  Target domain definition and classification in CASP8.

Authors:  Michael L Tress; Iakes Ezkurdia; Jane S Richardson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009

9.  Protein structure prediction center in CASP8.

Authors:  Andriy Kryshtafovych; Oleh Krysko; Pawel Daniluk; Zinovii Dmytriv; Krzysztof Fidelis
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009

10.  New tools and expanded data analysis capabilities at the Protein Structure Prediction Center.

Authors:  Andriy Kryshtafovych; Andreas Prlic; Zinoviy Dmytriv; Pawel Daniluk; Maciej Milostan; Volker Eyrich; Tim Hubbard; Krzysztof Fidelis
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2007
View more
  72 in total

1.  CONTSOR--a new knowledge-based fold recognition potential, based on side chain orientation and contacts between residue terminal groups.

Authors:  Boris Vishnepolsky; Malak Pirtskhalava
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Improving protein template recognition by using small-angle x-ray scattering profiles.

Authors:  Marcelo Augusto dos Reis; Ricardo Aparicio; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Evolution and function of the plant cell wall synthesis-related glycosyltransferase family 8.

Authors:  Yanbin Yin; Huiling Chen; Michael G Hahn; Debra Mohnen; Ying Xu
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Distributions of experimental protein structures on coarse-grained free energy landscapes.

Authors:  Kannan Sankar; Jie Liu; Yuan Wang; Robert L Jernigan
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Functional implications of structural predictions for alternative splice proteins expressed in Her2/neu-induced breast cancers.

Authors:  Rajasree Menon; Ambrish Roy; Srayanta Mukherjee; Saveliy Belkin; Yang Zhang; Gilbert S Omenn
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 4.466

6.  Automated protein structure modeling in CASP9 by I-TASSER pipeline combined with QUARK-based ab initio folding and FG-MD-based structure refinement.

Authors:  Dong Xu; Jian Zhang; Ambrish Roy; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-08-23

Review 7.  Computational methods in drug discovery.

Authors:  Gregory Sliwoski; Sandeepkumar Kothiwale; Jens Meiler; Edward W Lowe
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 25.468

8.  Assessment of template-based protein structure predictions in CASP10.

Authors:  Yuanpeng J Huang; Binchen Mao; James M Aramini; Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2014-02

9.  Assessment of protein assembly prediction in CASP13.

Authors:  Dmytro Guzenko; Aleix Lafita; Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Jose M Duarte
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-08-27

10.  Generating reservoir conformations for replica exchange through the use of the conformational space annealing method.

Authors:  Asim Okur; Benjamin T Miller; Keehyoung Joo; Jooyoung Lee; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.