Literature DB >> 19730954

Laparoscopy for small bowel obstruction: the reason for conversion matters.

D Dindo1, M Schafer, M K Muller, P A Clavien, D Hahnloser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopy is associated with reduced hospital stay, early recovery, and decreased morbidity compared with open surgery, it is not well established for the treatment of small bowel obstruction (SBO).
METHODS: This study analyzed a prospective nationwide database of the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery.
RESULTS: From 1995 to 2006, 537 patients underwent laparoscopy for SBO. Matted adhesions were the main cause of obstruction (62.6%). Intraoperative complications occurred for 9.5% of the patients. Postoperative morbidity was 14% and mortality 0.6%. Within 30 days, 13 patients (2.4%) were readmitted because of early recurrence or complications. The conversion rate was 32.4%. The conversions resulted from inability to visualize the site of obstruction or matted adhesions (53.4%), intraoperative complications (21.3%), and small target incisions for resection (25.3%). Emergency operations were associated with higher conversion rates (43.6% vs 19.8%; p < 0.001) but not with significantly more postoperative complications (15.2% vs 11.9%; p = 0.17). Intraoperative complications and conversion were associated with significantly increased postoperative morbidity (39.2% vs 11.3%; p < 0.001 and 24.7% vs 8.3%; p < 0.001, respectively). Reactive conversion due to intraoperative complications was associated with the highest postoperative complication rate (48.6%). Morbidity for preemptive conversion due to impaired visualization/matted adhesions or a small-target incision was significantly lower (20% and 26.1%; p = 0.02 and p < 0.001, respectively). American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) scores higher than 2 also were associated with postoperative morbidity (p < 0.001). However, multivariate regression analysis showed that reactive conversion was the only independent risk factor for postoperative morbidity (p < 0.001; odds ratio, 3.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.83-8.64).
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic management of SBO is feasible with acceptable morbidity and low mortality but with a considerable conversion rate. Early conversion is recommended to reduce postoperative morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19730954     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0658-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  19 in total

1.  Laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction. Experience from a Saudi teaching hospital.

Authors:  A A Al-Mulhim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic treatment of acute small bowel obstruction: a multicentre retrospective study.

Authors:  H Levard; M J Boudet; S Msika; J M Molkhou; J M Hay; Y Laborde; M Gillet; A Fingerhut
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.872

3.  Laparoscopic management of mechanical small bowel obstruction: are there predictors of success or failure?

Authors:  M Suter; P Zermatten; N Halkic; O Martinet; V Bettschart
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopy for acute small-bowel obstruction secondary to adhesions.

Authors:  D Chosidow; H Johanet; T Montariol; R Kielt; C Manceau; J P Marmuse; G Benhamou
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.878

5.  Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for acute adhesive small-bowel obstruction: patients' outcome and cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  M Khaikin; N Schneidereit; S Cera; D Sands; J Efron; E G Weiss; J J Nogueras; A M Vernava; S D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Laparoscopic approach to acute small bowel obstruction: review of 1061 cases.

Authors:  Bashar Ghosheh; J R Salameh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Does means of access affect the incidence of small bowel obstruction and ventral hernia after bowel resection? Laparoscopy versus laparotomy.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Duepree; Anthony J Senagore; Conor P Delaney; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Laparoscopic approach in acute small bowel obstruction. A review of 68 patients.

Authors:  B Navez; J M Arimont; P Guiot
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec

9.  Laparoscopic lysis of adhesions.

Authors:  Ritu Chopra; Carie McVay; Edward Phillips; Theodore M Khalili
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 10.  Laparoscopic lysis of adhesions.

Authors:  Samuel Szomstein; Emanuele Lo Menzo; Conrad Simpfendorfer; Nathan Zundel; Raul J Rosenthal
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.282

View more
  18 in total

1.  Achieving consensus on the definition of conversion to laparotomy: a Delphi study among general surgeons, gynecologists, and urologists.

Authors:  Mathijs D Blikkendaal; Andries R H Twijnstra; Anne M Stiggelbout; Harrie P Beerlage; Willem A Bemelman; Frank Willem Jansen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for acute small bowel obstruction: systematic review and pooled analysis.

Authors:  Tom Wiggins; Sheraz R Markar; Adrian Harris
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Outcomes of laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction: a 7-year experience of 110 consecutive cases with various etiologies.

Authors:  SiYuan Yao; Eiji Tanaka; Atsushi Ikeda; Teppei Murakami; Tatsuo Okumoto; Takehisa Harada
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-07-23       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Laparoscopic versus open surgical management of small bowel obstruction: an analysis of clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Ann Nordin; Jacob Freedman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Small Bowel Obstruction: the Sun Also Rises?

Authors:  Kirellos Zamary; David A Spain
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Laparotomy for small-bowel obstruction: first choice or last resort for adhesiolysis? A laparoscopic approach for small-bowel obstruction reduces 30-day complications.

Authors:  Kristin N Kelly; James C Iannuzzi; Aaron S Rickles; Veerabhadram Garimella; John R T Monson; Fergal J Fleming
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Novel device to detect enterotomies in real time during laparoscopy: first in human trial during Roux-en-y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Elisabeth K Wynne; Dan E Azagury
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Small bowel emergency surgery: literature's review.

Authors:  Carlo Vallicelli; Federico Coccolini; Fausto Catena; Luca Ansaloni; Giulia Montori; Salomone Di Saverio; Antonio D Pinna
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 9.  A Systematic Review of the Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Small Bowel Obstruction.

Authors:  Srinivas R Rami Reddy; Mitchell S Cappell
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2017-06

10.  Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer patients who underwent previous abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Soo Young Lee; Chang Hyun Kim; Young Jin Kim; Hyeong Rok Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.