Literature DB >> 10858476

Laparoscopic management of mechanical small bowel obstruction: are there predictors of success or failure?

M Suter1, P Zermatten, N Halkic, O Martinet, V Bettschart.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy is used increasingly for the management of acute abdominal conditions. For many years, previous abdominal surgery and intestinal obstruction have been regarded as contraindications to laparoscopy because there is an increased risk of iatrogenic bowel perforation. The role of laparoscopy in acute small bowel obstruction remains unclear.
METHODS: Since 1995, data from patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery have been entered prospectively into a database. Patients who underwent surgery before 1995 were added retrospectively to the same database. The charts of all patients treated surgically for mechanical small bowel obstruction were reviewed. Univariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with success or failure, especially intraoperative complications, conversion, and postoperative morbidity. Stepwise logistic regression was used to assess for independent variables.
RESULTS: This study included 83 patients (56 women and 27 men) with a mean age of 56 years (range, 17-91 years). Conversion was necessary in 36 cases (43%). Laparoscopy alone was successful in 47 patients (57%). Intraoperative complications were noted in 16% and postoperative complications in 31% of the patients. Eight reoperations (9%) were necessary. Mortality was 2.4%. Duration of surgery (p < 0.001) and a bowel diameter exceeding 4 cm (p = 0. 02) were predictors of conversion. No risk factor for intraoperative complication was identified. Accidental bowel perforation (p = 0. 008) and the need for conversion (p = 0.009) were the only independent factors associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic management of small bowel obstruction is possible in roughly 60% of the patients selected for this approach. Morbidity is lower, resumption of a normal diet is faster, and hospital stay is shorter than with patients requiring conversion. No clear predictor of success or failure was identified, but intraoperative complications must be avoided. If the surgeon is widely experienced in advanced laparoscopic surgery and there is a liberal conversion policy, laparoscopy is a valuable alternative to conventional surgery in the management of acute small bowel obstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10858476     DOI: 10.1007/s004640000104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  51 in total

Review 1.  Abdominal adhesions: intestinal obstruction, pain, and infertility.

Authors:  W W Vrijland; J Jeekel; H J van Geldorp; D J Swank; H J Bonjer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-14       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic approach to acute abdomen from the Consensus Development Conference of the Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e nuove tecnologie (SICE), Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani (ACOI), Società Italiana di Chirurgia (SIC), Società Italiana di Chirurgia d'Urgenza e del Trauma (SICUT), Società Italiana di Chirurgia nell'Ospedalità Privata (SICOP), and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Luca Ansaloni; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Carlo Bergamini; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Michele Carlucci; Giafranco Cocorullo; Alessio Corradi; Boris Franzato; Massimo Lupo; Vincenzo Mandalà; Antonino Mirabella; Graziano Pernazza; Micaela Piccoli; Carlo Staudacher; Nereo Vettoretto; Mauro Zago; Emanuele Lettieri; Anna Levati; Domenico Pietrini; Mariano Scaglione; Salvatore De Masi; Giuseppe De Placido; Marsilio Francucci; Monica Rasi; Abe Fingerhut; Selman Uranüs; Silvio Garattini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopy for acute small bowel obstruction: indication or contraindication?

Authors:  Ioannis Tierris; Constantinos Mavrantonis; Constantinos Stratoulias; George Panousis; Afrodite Mpetsou; Nicolaos Kalochristianakis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Identification of adhesions on CT in small-bowel obstruction.

Authors:  Bojan Petrovic; Paul Nikolaidis; Nancy A Hammond; Thomas H Grant; Frank H Miller
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2005-12-13

5.  Laparoscopy for benign colorectal diseases.

Authors:  Thomas Shin; Janice F Rafferty
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2010-02

6.  Laparoscopic treatment for small bowel obstruction: report of a case.

Authors:  Hester Yui Shan Cheung; Wing Tai Siu; Kwok Kay Yau; John Kam Wai Chan; Chung Ngai Tang; Michael Ka Wah Li
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Minimally Invasive Reoperation following Laparotomy.

Authors:  Tracey D Arnell
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2006-11

8.  Early laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction: retrospective study of main advantages.

Authors:  Claudia Hannele Mazzetti; Francesco Serinaldi; Eric Lebrun; Jean Lemaitre
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Laparoscopic approach to acute small bowel obstruction: review of 1061 cases.

Authors:  Bashar Ghosheh; J R Salameh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic versus open surgical management of adhesive small bowel obstruction: a comparison of outcomes.

Authors:  James Byrne; Fady Saleh; Luciano Ambrosini; Fayez Quereshy; Timothy D Jackson; Allan Okrainec
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.