PURPOSE: To establish a recommended sunitinib dosing schedule in Japanese patients with imatinib-resistant/intolerant gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) and to evaluate the efficacy, safety/tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of sunitinib using this schedule. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the phase I part of this open-label phase I/II trial, Japanese GIST patients received 25, 50, or 75 mg/day of sunitinib on Schedule 4/2 (4 weeks on treatment; 2 weeks off treatment) following imatinib failure. In phase II, patients received the recommended (maximum tolerated) dose on this schedule; the primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate (CBR; percent objective responses or stable disease [SD] ≥22 weeks). Additional efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetic, and biomarker analyses were performed. RESULTS: In phase I (12 patients), the recommended dose was determined to be 50 mg/day. Sunitinib pharmacokinetics were similar to those observed in studies with Western patients. In the phase II part (36 patients), the CBR was 39% (95% CI: 23–57%; 11% partial responses, 28% SD ≥22 weeks). The most common treatment-related non-hematologic adverse events (AEs) were hand–foot syndrome (86%) and fatigue (67%). A trend towards a correlation between decreases from baseline in plasma soluble KIT levels and improved CB was found. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics observed and clinical outcomes achieved in Japanese GIST patients on sunitinib (50 mg/day, Schedule 4/2) after imatinib failure appeared similar to those of Western patients in previous sunitinib trials. Although some serious AEs were observed, AEs were generally manageable using dose interruption/modification and/or standard medical treatments.
PURPOSE: To establish a recommended sunitinib dosing schedule in Japanese patients with imatinib-resistant/intolerant gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) and to evaluate the efficacy, safety/tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of sunitinib using this schedule. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the phase I part of this open-label phase I/II trial, Japanese GISTpatients received 25, 50, or 75 mg/day of sunitinib on Schedule 4/2 (4 weeks on treatment; 2 weeks off treatment) following imatinib failure. In phase II, patients received the recommended (maximum tolerated) dose on this schedule; the primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate (CBR; percent objective responses or stable disease [SD] ≥22 weeks). Additional efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetic, and biomarker analyses were performed. RESULTS: In phase I (12 patients), the recommended dose was determined to be 50 mg/day. Sunitinib pharmacokinetics were similar to those observed in studies with Western patients. In the phase II part (36 patients), the CBR was 39% (95% CI: 23–57%; 11% partial responses, 28% SD ≥22 weeks). The most common treatment-related non-hematologic adverse events (AEs) were hand–foot syndrome (86%) and fatigue (67%). A trend towards a correlation between decreases from baseline in plasma soluble KIT levels and improved CB was found. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics observed and clinical outcomes achieved in Japanese GISTpatients on sunitinib (50 mg/day, Schedule 4/2) after imatinib failure appeared similar to those of Western patients in previous sunitinib trials. Although some serious AEs were observed, AEs were generally manageable using dose interruption/modification and/or standard medical treatments.
Authors: Hans Prenen; Jan Cools; Nicole Mentens; Cedric Folens; Raf Sciot; Patrick Schöffski; Allan Van Oosterom; Peter Marynen; Maria Debiec-Rychter Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-04-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Martine Van Glabbeke; Jaap Verweij; Paolo G Casali; Axel Le Cesne; Peter Hohenberger; Isabelle Ray-Coquard; Marcus Schlemmer; Allan T van Oosterom; David Goldstein; Raf Sciot; Pancras C W Hogendoorn; Michelle Brown; Rossella Bertulli; Ian R Judson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-08-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Harold J Burstein; Anthony D Elias; Hope S Rugo; Melody A Cobleigh; Antonio C Wolff; Peter D Eisenberg; Mary Lehman; Bonne J Adams; Carlo L Bello; Samuel E DePrimo; Charles M Baum; Kathy D Miller Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-03-17 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lesley J Murray; Tinya J Abrams; Kelly R Long; Theresa J Ngai; Lisa M Olson; Weiru Hong; Paul K Keast; Jacqueline A Brassard; Anne Marie O'Farrell; Julie M Cherrington; Nancy K Pryer Journal: Clin Exp Metastasis Date: 2003 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: George D Demetri; Margaret von Mehren; Charles D Blanke; Annick D Van den Abbeele; Burton Eisenberg; Peter J Roberts; Michael C Heinrich; David A Tuveson; Samuel Singer; Milos Janicek; Jonathan A Fletcher; Stuart G Silverman; Sandra L Silberman; Renaud Capdeville; Beate Kiese; Bin Peng; Sasa Dimitrijevic; Brian J Druker; Christopher Corless; Christopher D M Fletcher; Heikki Joensuu Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-08-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Todd A Carter; Lisa M Wodicka; Neil P Shah; Anne Marie Velasco; Miles A Fabian; Daniel K Treiber; Zdravko V Milanov; Corey E Atteridge; William H Biggs; Philip T Edeen; Mark Floyd; Julia M Ford; Robert M Grotzfeld; Sanna Herrgard; Darren E Insko; Shamal A Mehta; Hitesh K Patel; William Pao; Charles L Sawyers; Harold Varmus; Patrick P Zarrinkar; David J Lockhart Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-07-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Huixin Yu; Neeltje Steeghs; Jacqueline S L Kloth; Djoeke de Wit; J G Coen van Hasselt; Nielka P van Erp; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens; Ron H J Mathijssen; Alwin D R Huitema Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Huixin Yu; Neeltje Steeghs; Cynthia M Nijenhuis; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen; Alwin D R Huitema Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 6.447