AIMS: Previously published pharmacokinetic (PK) models for sunitinib and its active metabolite SU12662 were based on a limited dataset or lacked important elements such as correlations between sunitinib and its metabolite. The current study aimed to develop an improved PK model that circumvented these limitations and to prove the utility of the PK model in treatment optimization in clinical practice. METHODS: One thousand two hundred and five plasma samples from 70 cancer patients were collected from three PK studies with sunitinib and SU12662. A semi-physiological PK model for sunitinib and SU12662 was developed incorporating pre-systemic metabolism using non-linear mixed effects modelling (nonmem). Allometric scaling based on body weight was applied. The final model was used for simulation of the PK of different treatment regimens. RESULTS: Sunitinib and SU12662 PK were best described by a one and two compartment model, respectively. Introduction of pre-systemic formation of SU12662 strongly improved model fit, compared with solely systemic metabolism. The clearance of sunitinib and SU12662 was estimated at 35.7 (relative standard error (RSE) 5.7%) l h(-1) and 17.1 (RSE 7.4%) l h(-1), respectively for 70 kg patients. Correlation coefficients were estimated between inter-individual variability of both clearances, both volumes of distribution and between clearance and volume of distribution of SU12662 as 0.53, 0.48 and 0.45, respectively. Simulation of the PK model predicted correctly the ratio of patients who did not reach proposed PK targets for efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: A semi-physiological PK model for sunitinib and SU12662 in cancer patients was presented including pre-systemic metabolism. The model was superior to previous PK models in many aspects.
AIMS: Previously published pharmacokinetic (PK) models for sunitinib and its active metabolite SU12662 were based on a limited dataset or lacked important elements such as correlations between sunitinib and its metabolite. The current study aimed to develop an improved PK model that circumvented these limitations and to prove the utility of the PK model in treatment optimization in clinical practice. METHODS: One thousand two hundred and five plasma samples from 70 cancerpatients were collected from three PK studies with sunitinib and SU12662. A semi-physiological PK model for sunitinib and SU12662 was developed incorporating pre-systemic metabolism using non-linear mixed effects modelling (nonmem). Allometric scaling based on body weight was applied. The final model was used for simulation of the PK of different treatment regimens. RESULTS:Sunitinib and SU12662 PK were best described by a one and two compartment model, respectively. Introduction of pre-systemic formation of SU12662 strongly improved model fit, compared with solely systemic metabolism. The clearance of sunitinib and SU12662 was estimated at 35.7 (relative standard error (RSE) 5.7%) l h(-1) and 17.1 (RSE 7.4%) l h(-1), respectively for 70 kg patients. Correlation coefficients were estimated between inter-individual variability of both clearances, both volumes of distribution and between clearance and volume of distribution of SU12662 as 0.53, 0.48 and 0.45, respectively. Simulation of the PK model predicted correctly the ratio of patients who did not reach proposed PK targets for efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: A semi-physiological PK model for sunitinib and SU12662 in cancerpatients was presented including pre-systemic metabolism. The model was superior to previous PK models in many aspects.
Authors: George D Demetri; Allan T van Oosterom; Christopher R Garrett; Martin E Blackstein; Manisha H Shah; Jaap Verweij; Grant McArthur; Ian R Judson; Michael C Heinrich; Jeffrey A Morgan; Jayesh Desai; Christopher D Fletcher; Suzanne George; Carlo L Bello; Xin Huang; Charles M Baum; Paolo G Casali Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-10-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Sebastian Frechen; Lisa Junge; Teijo I Saari; Ahmed Abbas Suleiman; Dennis Rokitta; Pertti J Neuvonen; Klaus T Olkkola; Uwe Fuhr Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Nienke A G Lankheet; Ingrid M E Desar; Sasja F Mulder; David M Burger; Dinemarie M Kweekel; Carla M L van Herpen; Winette T A van der Graaf; Nielka P van Erp Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2017-07-04 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Huixin Yu; Nielka van Erp; Sander Bins; Ron H J Mathijssen; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen; Neeltje Steeghs; Alwin D R Huitema Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Remy B Verheijen; Huixin Yu; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen; Neeltje Steeghs; Alwin D R Huitema Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2017-09-07 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: M H Diekstra; A Fritsch; F Kanefendt; J J Swen; Djar Moes; F Sörgel; M Kinzig; C Stelzer; D Schindele; T Gauler; S Hauser; D Houtsma; M Roessler; B Moritz; K Mross; L Bergmann; E Oosterwijk; L A Kiemeney; H J Guchelaar; U Jaehde Journal: CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol Date: 2017-07-13
Authors: Kim Westerdijk; Ingrid M E Desar; Neeltje Steeghs; Winette T A van der Graaf; Nielka P van Erp Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2020-01-21 Impact factor: 4.335