Literature DB >> 19730431

Tumour suppression by p53: a role for the DNA damage response?

David W Meek1.   

Abstract

Loss of p53 function occurs during the development of most, if not all, tumour types. This paves the way for genomic instability, tumour-associated changes in metabolism, insensitivity to apoptotic signals, invasiveness and motility. However, the nature of the causal link between early tumorigenic events and the induction of the p53-mediated checkpoints that constitute a barrier to tumour progression remains uncertain. This Review considers the role of the DNA damage response, which is activated during the early stages of tumour development, in mobilizing the tumour suppression function of p53. The relationship between these events and oncogene-induced p53 activation through the ARF pathway is also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19730431     DOI: 10.1038/nrc2716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer        ISSN: 1474-175X            Impact factor:   60.716


  157 in total

1.  Mdm2 is a RING finger-dependent ubiquitin protein ligase for itself and p53.

Authors:  S Fang; J P Jensen; R L Ludwig; K H Vousden; A M Weissman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-03-24       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Analysis of p53-regulated gene expression patterns using oligonucleotide arrays.

Authors:  R Zhao; K Gish; M Murphy; Y Yin; D Notterman; W H Hoffman; E Tom; D H Mack; A J Levine
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 3.  ATM-mediated phosphorylations inhibit Mdmx/Mdm2 stabilization by HAUSP in favor of p53 activation.

Authors:  Erik Meulmeester; Yaron Pereg; Yosef Shiloh; Aart G Jochemsen
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  p19(ARF) is dispensable for oncogenic stress-induced p53-mediated apoptosis and tumor suppression in vivo.

Authors:  Dawn Tolbert; Xiangdong Lu; Chaoying Yin; Mathew Tantama; Terry Van Dyke
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  AMP-activated protein kinase induces a p53-dependent metabolic checkpoint.

Authors:  Russell G Jones; David R Plas; Sara Kubek; Monica Buzzai; James Mu; Yang Xu; Morris J Birnbaum; Craig B Thompson
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Mdm-2 binding and TAF(II)31 recruitment is regulated by hydrogen bond disruption between the p53 residues Thr18 and Asp21.

Authors:  James R Jabbur; Amy D Tabor; Xiaodong Cheng; Hua Wang; Motonari Uesugi; Guillermina Lozano; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2002-10-10       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  Rescue of embryonic lethality in Mdm2-deficient mice by absence of p53.

Authors:  S N Jones; A E Roe; L A Donehower; A Bradley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-11-09       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Structural basis for p300 Taz2-p53 TAD1 binding and modulation by phosphorylation.

Authors:  Hanqiao Feng; Lisa M Miller Jenkins; Stewart R Durell; Ryo Hayashi; Sharlyn J Mazur; Scott Cherry; Joseph E Tropea; Maria Miller; Alexander Wlodawer; Ettore Appella; Yawen Bai
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 5.006

9.  p53 stabilization in response to DNA damage requires Akt/PKB and DNA-PK.

Authors:  Karen A Boehme; Roman Kulikov; Christine Blattner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Reduction of p53 gene dosage does not increase initiation or promotion but enhances malignant progression of chemically induced skin tumors.

Authors:  C J Kemp; L A Donehower; A Bradley; A Balmain
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-09-10       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  275 in total

Review 1.  MicroRNAs, wild-type and mutant p53: more questions than answers.

Authors:  Matthew Jones; Ashish Lal
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 4.652

Review 2.  Genetic variants associated with breast-cancer risk: comprehensive research synopsis, meta-analysis, and epidemiological evidence.

Authors:  Ben Zhang; Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel; Jirong Long; Wei Zheng
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Regulation of the DNA damage response by p53 cofactors.

Authors:  Xiao-Peng Zhang; Feng Liu; Wei Wang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Doubles game: Src-Stat3 versus p53-PTEN in cellular migration and invasion.

Authors:  Utpal K Mukhopadhyay; Patrick Mooney; Lilly Jia; Robert Eves; Leda Raptis; Alan S Mak
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Nutlin's two roads toward apoptosis.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Hua Lu
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 4.742

6.  Coordination between cell cycle progression and cell fate decision by the p53 and E2F1 pathways in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Xiao-Peng Zhang; Feng Liu; Wei Wang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 7.  Posttranslational modification of p53: cooperative integrators of function.

Authors:  David W Meek; Carl W Anderson
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 10.005

8.  Cancer: The blind spot of p53.

Authors:  Anton Berns
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Radioprobing the conformation of DNA in a p53-DNA complex.

Authors:  Valeri N Karamychev; Difei Wang; Sharlyn J Mazur; Ettore Appella; Ronald D Neumann; Victor B Zhurkin; Igor G Panyutin
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 2.694

10.  Sharp-1 modulates the cellular response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Jian-Jun Liu; Teng-Kai Chung; Jiali Li; Reshma Taneja
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 4.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.