David J Wallace1, Christopher W Seymour, Jeremy M Kahn. 1. 1Clinical Research, Investigation and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA) Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA. 2Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA. 3Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh PA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Although the number of intensive care beds in the United States is increasing, little is known about the hospitals responsible for this growth. We sought to better characterize national growth in intensive care beds by identifying hospital-level factors associated with increasing numbers of intensive care beds over time. DESIGN: We performed a repeated-measures time series analysis of hospital-level intensive care bed supply using data from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. SETTING: All United States acute care hospitals with adult intensive care beds over the years 1996-2011. PATIENTS: None. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We described the number of beds, teaching status, ownership, intensive care occupancy, and urbanicity for each hospital in each year of the study. We then examined the relationship between increasing intensive care beds and these characteristics, controlling for other factors. The study included 4,457 hospitals and 55,865 hospital-years. Overall, the majority of intensive care bed growth occurred in teaching hospitals (net, +13,471 beds; 72.1% of total growth), hospitals with 250 or more beds (net, +18,327 beds; 91.8% of total growth), and hospitals in the highest quartile of occupancy (net, +10,157 beds; 54.0% of total growth). In a longitudinal multivariable model, larger hospital size, teaching status, and high intensive care occupancy were associated with subsequent-year growth. Furthermore, the effects of hospital size and teaching status were modified by occupancy: the greatest odds of increasing ICU beds were in hospitals with 500 or more beds in the highest quartile of occupancy (adjusted odds ratio, 18.9; 95% CI, 14.0-25.5; p < 0.01) and large teaching hospitals in the highest quartile of occupancy (adjusted odds ratio, 7.3; 95% CI, 5.3-9.9; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Increasingly, intensive care bed expansion in the United States is occurring in larger hospitals and teaching centers, particularly following a year with high ICU occupancy.
OBJECTIVES: Although the number of intensive care beds in the United States is increasing, little is known about the hospitals responsible for this growth. We sought to better characterize national growth in intensive care beds by identifying hospital-level factors associated with increasing numbers of intensive care beds over time. DESIGN: We performed a repeated-measures time series analysis of hospital-level intensive care bed supply using data from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. SETTING: All United States acute care hospitals with adult intensive care beds over the years 1996-2011. PATIENTS: None. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We described the number of beds, teaching status, ownership, intensive care occupancy, and urbanicity for each hospital in each year of the study. We then examined the relationship between increasing intensive care beds and these characteristics, controlling for other factors. The study included 4,457 hospitals and 55,865 hospital-years. Overall, the majority of intensive care bed growth occurred in teaching hospitals (net, +13,471 beds; 72.1% of total growth), hospitals with 250 or more beds (net, +18,327 beds; 91.8% of total growth), and hospitals in the highest quartile of occupancy (net, +10,157 beds; 54.0% of total growth). In a longitudinal multivariable model, larger hospital size, teaching status, and high intensive care occupancy were associated with subsequent-year growth. Furthermore, the effects of hospital size and teaching status were modified by occupancy: the greatest odds of increasing ICU beds were in hospitals with 500 or more beds in the highest quartile of occupancy (adjusted odds ratio, 18.9; 95% CI, 14.0-25.5; p < 0.01) and large teaching hospitals in the highest quartile of occupancy (adjusted odds ratio, 7.3; 95% CI, 5.3-9.9; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Increasingly, intensive care bed expansion in the United States is occurring in larger hospitals and teaching centers, particularly following a year with high ICU occupancy.
Authors: Carsi A Polanczyk; Anthereca Lane; Michelle Coburn; Edward F Philbin; G William Dec; Thomas G DiSalvo Journal: Am J Med Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: David J Wallace; Derek C Angus; Christopher W Seymour; Amber E Barnato; Jeremy M Kahn Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2015-02-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Jason Wagner; Nicole B Gabler; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Sydney E S Brown; Brian L Strom; Scott D Halpern Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2013-10-01 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Gary E Weissman; Meeta Prasad Kerlin; Yihao Yuan; Nicole B Gabler; Peter W Groeneveld; Rachel M Werner; Scott D Halpern Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2018-10-16 Impact factor: 25.391