Literature DB >> 19730147

Conservative treatment of vestibular schwannoma: a follow-up study on clinical and quality-of-life outcome.

Willem P Godefroy1, Adrian A Kaptein, Justine J Vogel, Andel G L van der Mey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the natural history and long-term quality-of-life (QOL) outcome after conservative treatment for vestibular schwannoma. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective study conducted in a university-based tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: A total of 70 vestibular schwannoma patients who were initially included in the wait and scan protocol between January 2002 and December 2003 were followed with a mean observation time of 43 months. All patients had small- or medium-sized tumors when they were included in the protocol. QOL was measured at diagnosis and at the end of follow-up in those patients who were still conservatively treated using the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36). The study group was characterized by nongrowing small tumors and relatively stable symptoms over time. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical, audiometric, radiologic, and QOL results.
RESULTS: In 44 patients (63%), growth of the tumor was not observed, and 25 (36%) tumors did grow. Of the 70 included patients, 27 patients (39%) required treatment. Forty-one patients (59%) were still conservatively treated at the end of follow-up (mean 47 +/- 16 mo). Hearing was preserved in 16 (57%) of the 28 patients with useful hearing at diagnosis. At the end of follow-up, SF-36 scores were only slightly deteriorated for almost all subscales when compared with scores at diagnosis; however, differences were statistically not significant (p > 0.05). There was no significant correlation between the presence of cochleovestibular symptoms and QOL scores (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Conservative observation of small vestibular schwannomas may be regarded as a reasonable management option because most of these tumors do not grow during an initial period of observation. Conservative treatment of this subset of patients with small, nongrowing tumors does not significantly affect life functioning, as reflected in SF-36 survey data. However, hearing loss did progress in this population. Thus, patients should be counseled regarding this risk and generic QOL measures such as the SF-36 should be used with caution in future assessments. This study emphasizes the importance of combining generic and disease-specific QOL measures in future studies of protocols of vestibular schwannoma management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19730147     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181b4e3c9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  15 in total

1.  Illness perceptions, risk perception and worry in SDH mutation carriers.

Authors:  L T van Hulsteijn; A A Kaptein; A Louisse; N R Biermasz; J W A Smit; E P M Corssmit
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Systematic Review of Hearing Preservation in Observed Vestibular Schwannoma.

Authors:  Martin Reznitsky; Per Cayé-Thomasen
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2019-03-01

3.  Vestibular assessment in patients with vestibular schwannomas: what really matters?

Authors:  R Teggi; A Franzin; G Spatola; N Boari; P Picozzi; M Bailo; L O Piccioni; F Gagliardi; P Mortini; M Bussi
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.124

4.  [Hearing results after middle fossa removal of small (T1/T2) vestibular schwannomas].

Authors:  M Scheich; D Ehrmann-Müller; W Shehata-Dieler; R Hagen
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 5.  [Quality of life in patients with vestibular schwannoma].

Authors:  I Baumann; P K Plinkert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Natural History, Multimodal Management, and Quality of Life Outcomes of Trigeminal Schwannomas.

Authors:  Serge Makarenko; Vincent Ye; Ryojo Akagami
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-05-10

7.  Quality of life after microsurgery for vestibular schwannoma via the middle cranial fossa approach.

Authors:  Matthias Scheich; Christian Ginzkey; Edith Reuter; Wilma Harnisch; Desiree Ehrmann; Rudolf Hagen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Long-term hearing outcome after retrosigmoid removal of vestibular schwannoma.

Authors:  Akira Nakamizo; Megumu Mori; Daisuke Inoue; Toshiyuki Amano; Masahiro Mizoguchi; Koji Yoshimoto; Tomio Sasaki
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 1.742

9.  Combined endoscopic-microscopic approach for vestibular schwannoma removal: outcomes in a cohort of 81 patients.

Authors:  L Presutti; F Magnaguagno; G Pavesi; E Cunsolo; G Pinna; M Alicandri-Ciufelli; D Marchioni; A Prontera; F M Gioacchini
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.124

10.  Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging provides additional information as compared to anatomical imaging for decision-making in vestibular schwannoma.

Authors:  M C Kleijwegt; A G L van der Mey; F T Wiggers-deBruine; M J A Malessy; M J P van Osch
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2016-06-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.