RATIONALE: Regimens recommended to treat latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) are 3 to 9 months long. A 2-month rifampin+pyrazinamide regimen is no longer recommended. Shorter regimens are highly desirable. Because substituting rifapentine for rifampin in the standard regimen for active tuberculosis halves the treatment duration needed to prevent relapse in mice, we hypothesized daily rifapentine-based regimens could shorten LTBI treatment to 2 months or less. OBJECTIVES: To improve an existing model of LTBI chemotherapy and evaluate the efficacy of daily rifapentine-based regimens. METHODS: Mice were immunized with a more immunogenic recombinant Bacille Calmette-Guérin strain (rBCG30) and received very low-dose aerosol infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis to establish a stable lung bacterial burden below 10(4) CFU without drug treatment. Mice received a control (isoniazid alone, rifampin alone, rifampin+isoniazid, rifampin+pyrazinamide) or test (rifapentine alone, rifapentine+isoniazid, rifapentine+pyrazinamide, rifapentine+isoniazid+pyrazinamide) regimen for 8 weeks. Rifamycin doses were 10 mg/kg/d, analogous to the same human doses. Outcomes were biweekly lung CFU counts and relapse after 4 to 8 weeks of treatment. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: M. tuberculosis CFU counts remained stable around 3.65 log(10) in immunized, untreated mice. Isoniazid or rifampin left all or most mice culture-positive at week 8. Rifampin+isoniazid cured 0 and 53% of mice and rifampin+pyrazinamide cured 47 and 100% of mice in 4 and 8 weeks, respectively. Rifapentine-based regimens were more active than rifampin+isoniazid and indistinguishable from rifampin+pyrazinamide. CONCLUSIONS: In this improved murine model of LTBI chemotherapy with very low lung burden, existing regimens were well represented. Daily rifapentine-based regimens were at least as active as rifampin+pyrazinamide, suggesting they could effectively treat LTBI in 6 to 8 weeks.
RATIONALE: Regimens recommended to treat latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) are 3 to 9 months long. A 2-month rifampin+pyrazinamide regimen is no longer recommended. Shorter regimens are highly desirable. Because substituting rifapentine for rifampin in the standard regimen for active tuberculosis halves the treatment duration needed to prevent relapse in mice, we hypothesized daily rifapentine-based regimens could shorten LTBI treatment to 2 months or less. OBJECTIVES: To improve an existing model of LTBI chemotherapy and evaluate the efficacy of daily rifapentine-based regimens. METHODS:Mice were immunized with a more immunogenic recombinant Bacille Calmette-Guérin strain (rBCG30) and received very low-dose aerosol infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis to establish a stable lung bacterial burden below 10(4) CFU without drug treatment. Mice received a control (isoniazid alone, rifampin alone, rifampin+isoniazid, rifampin+pyrazinamide) or test (rifapentine alone, rifapentine+isoniazid, rifapentine+pyrazinamide, rifapentine+isoniazid+pyrazinamide) regimen for 8 weeks. Rifamycin doses were 10 mg/kg/d, analogous to the same human doses. Outcomes were biweekly lung CFU counts and relapse after 4 to 8 weeks of treatment. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: M. tuberculosis CFU counts remained stable around 3.65 log(10) in immunized, untreated mice. Isoniazid or rifampin left all or most mice culture-positive at week 8. Rifampin+isoniazid cured 0 and 53% of mice and rifampin+pyrazinamide cured 47 and 100% of mice in 4 and 8 weeks, respectively. Rifapentine-based regimens were more active than rifampin+isoniazid and indistinguishable from rifampin+pyrazinamide. CONCLUSIONS: In this improved murine model of LTBI chemotherapy with very low lung burden, existing regimens were well represented. Daily rifapentine-based regimens were at least as active as rifampin+pyrazinamide, suggesting they could effectively treat LTBI in 6 to 8 weeks.
Authors: N A Halsey; J S Coberly; J Desormeaux; P Losikoff; J Atkinson; L H Moulton; M Contave; M Johnson; H Davis; L Geiter; E Johnson; R Huebner; R Boulos; R E Chaisson Journal: Lancet Date: 1998-03-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: U Mack; G B Migliori; M Sester; H L Rieder; S Ehlers; D Goletti; A Bossink; K Magdorf; C Hölscher; B Kampmann; S M Arend; A Detjen; G Bothamley; J P Zellweger; H Milburn; R Diel; P Ravn; F Cobelens; P J Cardona; B Kan; I Solovic; R Duarte; D M Cirillo Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Dick Menzies; Richard Long; Anete Trajman; Marie-Josée Dion; Jae Yang; Hamdan Al Jahdali; Ziad Memish; Kamran Khan; Michael Gardam; Vernon Hoeppner; Andrea Benedetti; Kevin Schwartzman Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2008-11-18 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Ian M Rosenthal; Ming Zhang; Kathy N Williams; Charles A Peloquin; Sandeep Tyagi; Andrew A Vernon; William R Bishai; Richard E Chaisson; Jacques H Grosset; Eric L Nuermberger Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Molebogeng X Rangaka; Solange C Cavalcante; Ben J Marais; Sok Thim; Neil A Martinson; Soumya Swaminathan; Richard E Chaisson Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-10-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Radojka M Savic; Yanhui Lu; Erin Bliven-Sizemore; Marc Weiner; Eric Nuermberger; William Burman; Susan E Dorman; Kelly E Dooley Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2014-03-10 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Tianyu Zhang; Si-Yang Li; Kathy N Williams; Koen Andries; Eric L Nuermberger Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2011-06-09 Impact factor: 21.405