BACKGROUND: Treatment of latent tuberculosis infection with isoniazid for 9 months is complicated by poor patient adherence and the need for close follow-up of side effects, especially hepatotoxicity. Shorter and safer regimens are needed. OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency of adverse events and treatment completion in 2 treatment regimens for latent tuberculosis infection. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, open-label trial. SETTING:Tuberculosis clinics located in university hospitals in Canada, Brazil, and Saudi Arabia. PATIENTS: 847 patients without a contraindication for rifampin and requiring treatment for latent tuberculosis infection. INTERVENTION: Four months of daily rifampin therapy or 9 months of daily isoniazid therapy. MEASUREMENTS: Grade 3 to 4 drug-related adverse events resulting in drug discontinuation (primary outcome), and on-time treatment completion, grade 1 to 2 drug-related adverse events, and changes in liver enzymes and hematologic variables (secondary outcomes). RESULTS:Seventeen of 422 participants who startedisoniazid therapy developed grade 3 to 4 adverse events compared with 7 of 418 who started rifampin therapy (risk difference [rifampin minus isoniazid], -2.3% [95% CI, -5% to -0.1%]; P = 0.040). Grade 3 or 4 hepatitis occurred in 16 of 422 isoniazid recipients compared with 3 of 418 rifampin recipients (risk difference, -3.1% [CI, -5% to -1%]; P = 0.003). Grade 1 or 2 adverse events attributed to study drugs occurred with similar frequency. Asymptomatic reduction in platelet and leukocyte counts were more frequent in rifampin recipients. More patients completed rifampin treatment (78%) than isoniazid treatment (60%) (difference, 18% [CI, 12% to 24%]; P < 0.001]). LIMITATION: The study did not measure efficacy, and the open-label design may increase the chance of bias in ascertainment of adverse events. CONCLUSION: Treatment of latent tuberculosis with 4 months of rifampin leads to fewer serious adverse events and better adherence than 9 months of isoniazid. These findings justify a large-scale trial to compare the efficacy of rifampin with that of isoniazid.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Treatment of latent tuberculosis infection with isoniazid for 9 months is complicated by poor patient adherence and the need for close follow-up of side effects, especially hepatotoxicity. Shorter and safer regimens are needed. OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency of adverse events and treatment completion in 2 treatment regimens for latent tuberculosis infection. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, open-label trial. SETTING:Tuberculosis clinics located in university hospitals in Canada, Brazil, and Saudi Arabia. PATIENTS: 847 patients without a contraindication for rifampin and requiring treatment for latent tuberculosis infection. INTERVENTION: Four months of daily rifampin therapy or 9 months of daily isoniazid therapy. MEASUREMENTS: Grade 3 to 4 drug-related adverse events resulting in drug discontinuation (primary outcome), and on-time treatment completion, grade 1 to 2 drug-related adverse events, and changes in liver enzymes and hematologic variables (secondary outcomes). RESULTS: Seventeen of 422 participants who started isoniazid therapy developed grade 3 to 4 adverse events compared with 7 of 418 who started rifampin therapy (risk difference [rifampin minus isoniazid], -2.3% [95% CI, -5% to -0.1%]; P = 0.040). Grade 3 or 4 hepatitis occurred in 16 of 422 isoniazid recipients compared with 3 of 418 rifampin recipients (risk difference, -3.1% [CI, -5% to -1%]; P = 0.003). Grade 1 or 2 adverse events attributed to study drugs occurred with similar frequency. Asymptomatic reduction in platelet and leukocyte counts were more frequent in rifampin recipients. More patients completed rifampin treatment (78%) than isoniazid treatment (60%) (difference, 18% [CI, 12% to 24%]; P < 0.001]). LIMITATION: The study did not measure efficacy, and the open-label design may increase the chance of bias in ascertainment of adverse events. CONCLUSION: Treatment of latent tuberculosis with 4 months of rifampin leads to fewer serious adverse events and better adherence than 9 months of isoniazid. These findings justify a large-scale trial to compare the efficacy of rifampin with that of isoniazid.
Authors: Jennifer D Hosford; Michael E von Fricken; Michael Lauzardo; Myron Chang; Yunfeng Dai; Jennifer A Lyon; John Shuster; Kevin P Fennelly Journal: Tuberculosis (Edinb) Date: 2014-12-18 Impact factor: 3.131
Authors: Robert Belknap; David Holland; Pei-Jean Feng; Joan-Pau Millet; Joan A Caylà; Neil A Martinson; Alicia Wright; Michael P Chen; Ruth N Moro; Nigel A Scott; Bert Arevalo; José M Miró; Margarita E Villarino; Marc Weiner; Andrey S Borisov Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2017-11-07 Impact factor: 25.391