Literature DB >> 19727994

Surgical treatment of grade I central chondrosarcoma.

Davide Donati1, Simone Colangeli, Marco Colangeli, Claudia Di Bella, Franco Bertoni.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The grade of chondrosarcoma relates to the likelihood of local recurrence and metastases. Many Grade I chondrosarcomas behave benignly if aggressively, and the question arises regarding whether wide resection is essential to control the disease. We therefore asked whether intralesional surgery also could be extended to Grade I chondrosarcomas without an increase in recurrence. We retrospectively reviewed 31 patients with Grade I chondrosarcomas of the limbs. The minimum followup was 66 months (mean, 157 months; range, 66-296 months). None of the 16 patients treated by resection had recurrences during the followup and two of the 15 patients with intralesional excision had recurrences, both of which resolved with resection of the site involved by the recurrence without progression of the disease. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores averaged 72% in patients treated with wide resection compared with 89% in the 15 patients treated by intralesional surgery. The two recurrences occurred in patients whose radiographs showed thinning of the cortex combined with bone enlargement and marked endosteal scalloping; histologic examination in these two patients also showed a correlation between radiographic aggressiveness and the presence of myxoid areas and hypercellularity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19727994      PMCID: PMC2806970          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1056-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  23 in total

Review 1.  Benign and malignant cartilage tumors of bone and joint: their anatomic and theoretical basis with an emphasis on radiology, pathology and clinical biology. I. The intramedullary cartilage tumors.

Authors:  E W Brien; J M Mirra; R Kerr
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of cartilaginous tumors: a retrospective study of 79 patients.

Authors:  L H De Beuckeleer; A M De Schepper; F Ramon; J Somville
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 3.  Chondrosarcoma: a review.

Authors:  D S Springfield; M C Gebhardt; M H McGuire
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1996

4.  Usefulness of radiography in differentiating enchondroma from central grade 1 chondrosarcoma.

Authors:  M J Geirnaerdt; J Hermans; J L Bloem; H M Kroon; T L Pope; A H Taminiau; P C Hogendoorn
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Chondrosarcoma of bone: an assessment of outcome.

Authors:  F Y Lee; H J Mankin; G Fondren; M C Gebhardt; D S Springfield; A E Rosenberg; L C Jennings
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Minichromosome maintenance protein (MCM6) in low-grade chondrosarcoma: distinction from enchondroma and identification of progressive tumors.

Authors:  Andreas Helfenstein; Sven O Frahm; Matthias Krams; Wolf Drescher; Reza Parwaresch; Joachim Hassenpflug
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.493

7.  Diagnosis of borderline cartilage lesions of bone.

Authors:  A L Schiller
Journal:  Semin Diagn Pathol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 3.464

8.  Enchondroma versus chondrosarcoma in the appendicular skeleton: differentiating features.

Authors:  M D Murphey; D J Flemming; S R Boyea; J A Bojescul; D E Sweet; H T Temple
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

9.  [Bone resorption and remodelling in chondrosarcomas of the limbs and pelvis. Diagnostic value in 84 cases].

Authors:  A Jelthi; M Forest; B Tomeno; R Abelanet
Journal:  Ann Pathol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 0.407

10.  Low risk of recurrence of enchondroma and low-grade chondrosarcoma in extremities. 80 patients followed for 2-25 years.

Authors:  H C Bauer; O Brosjö; A Kreicbergs; J Lindholm
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1995-06
View more
  26 in total

1.  [Primary malignant bone tumors].

Authors:  R von Eisenhart-Rothe; A Toepfer; M Salzmann; J Schauwecker; H Gollwitzer; H Rechl
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Low-grade chondrosarcoma of bone: experiences from the Vienna Bone and Soft Tissue Tumour Registry.

Authors:  Philipp T Funovics; Joannis Panotopoulos; Manuel Sabeti-Aschraf; Farshid Abdolvahab; Josef M Funovics; Susanna Lang; Rainer I Kotz; Martin Dominkus
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-08-28       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Chondrosarcoma of bone: lessons from 46 operated cases in a single institution.

Authors:  Olavo Pires de Camargo; André Mathias Baptista; Marcelo Junqueira Atanásio; Daniel Reis Waisberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Risk factors for local recurrence from atypical cartilaginous tumour and enchondroma of the long bones.

Authors:  Costantino Errani; Shinji Tsukamoto; Giovanni Ciani; Manabu Akahane; Luca Cevolani; Piergiuseppe Tanzi; Akira Kido; Kanya Honoki; Yasuhito Tanaka; Davide Maria Donati
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-05-13

5.  Curettage and cryosurgery for low-grade cartilage tumors is associated with low recurrence and high function.

Authors:  David G Mohler; Richard Chiu; David A McCall; Raffi S Avedian
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  MRI differentiation of low-grade from high-grade appendicular chondrosarcoma.

Authors:  Hassan Douis; Leanne Singh; Asif Saifuddin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Is there a role for diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) in the diagnosis of central cartilage tumors?

Authors:  H Douis; L Jeys; R Grimer; S Vaiyapuri; A M Davies
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Intralesional treatment versus wide resection for central low-grade chondrosarcoma of the long bones.

Authors:  Edwin F Dierselhuis; Krista A Goulding; Martin Stevens; Paul C Jutte
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-03-07

Review 9.  Treatment strategies for central low-grade chondrosarcoma of long bones: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S S Shemesh; J D Acevedo-Nieves; J Pretell-Mazzini
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-10-06

10.  Estimated cause-specific survival continues to improve over time in patients with chondrosarcoma.

Authors:  Kyle R Duchman; Charles F Lynch; Joseph A Buckwalter; Benjamin J Miller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.