Literature DB >> 19724238

MR evaluation of left ventricular volumes and function: threshold-based 3D segmentation versus short-axis planimetry.

Kai Nassenstein1, Armin de Greiff, Peter Hunold.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Our study aimed to evaluate a three-dimensional (3D) threshold-based, region-growing segmentation algorithm for the assessment of left ventricular (LV) volumes in cardiac MRI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two-dimensional cine steady-state free precession short-axis scans (TR 3 milliseconds, TE 1.5 milliseconds, FA 60 degrees , section thickness 8 mm) covering the entire LV without slice gap were acquired in 44 consecutive patients on a 1.5 Tesla MR system (Magnetom Avanto, Siemens, Germany). LV volumes were assessed with an in-house written 3D threshold-based, interslice region-growing segmentation algorithm, and were compared with manual tracing and short-axis planimetry with semiautomatic contour detection (Argus software, Siemens, Germany).
RESULTS: Three-dimensional threshold-based segmentation was feasible in 41 of 44 patients. Results of threshold-based segmentation were not statistically significantly different to manual tracing for the assessment of end-diastolic (EDV: 104.5 +/- 32.3 mL vs. 104.7 +/- 33.26 mL, P > 0.05), end-systolic (ESV: 34.5 +/- 17.2 mL vs. 33.8 +/- 17.45 mL, P > 0.05), and stroke (SV: 69.9 +/- 25.0 mL vs. 70.9 +/- 25.0 mL, P > 0.05) volumes. Bland-Altmann plots showed systematic lower EDV (-12.0 +/- 6.7 mL), ESV (-4.8 +/- 3.7 mL), and SV (-7.3 +/- 7.6 mL), and a systematic higher ejection fraction (0.4% +/- 5.0%) for threshold-based segmentation compared with short-axis planimetry with semiautomatic contour detection. Threshold-based segmentation showed an excellent reproducibility with low absolute differences between 2 consecutive analyses (EDV: 0.2 +/- 2.2 mL; ESV: 0.5 +/- 1.9 mL; SV: 0.6 +/- 3.4 mL; EF: 0.5% +/- 2.1%). Evaluation times were significantly shorter for threshold-based segmentation (60 +/- 16 vs. 278 +/- 31 seconds/669 +/- 157 seconds, P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Automated threshold-based segmentation of the left ventricle allows fast and reproducible assessment of LV volumes in cardiac MRI. Exclusion of papillary muscles and myocardial trabeculations from LV volumes leads to systematically lower LV volumes compared with short axis planimetry with semi-automatic contour detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19724238     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181a9aaaf

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  6 in total

1.  Semiautomatic three-dimensional CT ventricular volumetry in patients with congenital heart disease: agreement between two methods with different user interaction.

Authors:  Hyun Woo Goo; Sang-Hyub Park
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  CMR reference values for left ventricular volumes, mass, and ejection fraction using computer-aided analysis: the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Michael L Chuang; Philimon Gona; Gilion L T F Hautvast; Carol J Salton; Marcel Breeuwer; Christopher J O'Donnell; Warren J Manning
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Pediatric cardiac MRI: automated left-ventricular volumes and function analysis and effects of manual adjustments.

Authors:  Matthias Hammon; Rolf Janka; Peter Dankerl; Martin Glöckler; Ferdinand J Kammerer; Sven Dittrich; Michael Uder; Oliver Rompel
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-11-19

4.  Bias associated with left ventricular quantification by multimodality imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marzia Rigolli; Sulakchanan Anandabaskaran; Jonathan P Christiansen; Gillian A Whalley
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2016-04-27

5.  Semiautomatic Three-Dimensional Threshold-Based Cardiac Computed Tomography Ventricular Volumetry in Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot: Comparison with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Hyun Woo Goo
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  Comparison between Three-Dimensional Navigator-Gated Whole-Heart MRI and Two-Dimensional Cine MRI in Quantifying Ventricular Volumes.

Authors:  Hyun Woo Goo
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.500

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.