SETTING: Mulago Hospital, Kampala, Uganda. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of fluorescence microscopy (FM) for diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) in a high human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevalence setting. DESIGN: Consecutive in-patients with cough for >2 weeks submitted two sputum specimens for smear microscopy. Smears were examined by conventional light microscopy (CM) and FM. The performance of the two methods was compared using mycobacterial culture as a reference standard. RESULTS: A total of 426 patients (82% HIV-infected) were evaluated. FM identified 11% more smear-positive patients than CM (49% vs. 38%, P < 0.001). However, positive FM results were less likely than positive CM results to be confirmed by culture when smears were read as either 'scanty' (54% vs. 90%, P < 0.001) or 1+ (82% vs. 91%, P = 0.02). Compared to CM, the sensitivity of FM was higher (72% vs. 64%, P = 0.005), and the specificity lower (81% vs. 96%, P < 0.001). In receiver operating characteristic analysis, maximum area under the curve for FM was obtained at a threshold of >4 acid-fast bacilli/100 fields (sensitivity 68%, specificity 90%). CONCLUSION: Although FM increases the sensitivity of sputum smear microscopy, additional data on FM specificity and on the clinical consequences associated with false-positive FM results are needed to guide implementation of this technology in high HIV prevalence settings.
SETTING: Mulago Hospital, Kampala, Uganda. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of fluorescence microscopy (FM) for diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) in a high human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevalence setting. DESIGN: Consecutive in-patients with cough for >2 weeks submitted two sputum specimens for smear microscopy. Smears were examined by conventional light microscopy (CM) and FM. The performance of the two methods was compared using mycobacterial culture as a reference standard. RESULTS: A total of 426 patients (82% HIV-infected) were evaluated. FM identified 11% more smear-positive patients than CM (49% vs. 38%, P < 0.001). However, positive FM results were less likely than positive CM results to be confirmed by culture when smears were read as either 'scanty' (54% vs. 90%, P < 0.001) or 1+ (82% vs. 91%, P = 0.02). Compared to CM, the sensitivity of FM was higher (72% vs. 64%, P = 0.005), and the specificity lower (81% vs. 96%, P < 0.001). In receiver operating characteristic analysis, maximum area under the curve for FM was obtained at a threshold of >4 acid-fast bacilli/100 fields (sensitivity 68%, specificity 90%). CONCLUSION: Although FM increases the sensitivity of sputum smear microscopy, additional data on FM specificity and on the clinical consequences associated with false-positive FM results are needed to guide implementation of this technology in high HIV prevalence settings.
Authors: J G Lijmer; B W Mol; S Heisterkamp; G J Bonsel; M H Prins; J H van der Meulen; P M Bossuyt Journal: JAMA Date: 1999-09-15 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: A Van Deun; A Hamid Salim; E Cooreman; Md Anwar Hossain; A Rema; N Chambugonj; Md A Hye; A Kawria; E Declercq Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Yvonne R Shea; J Lucian Davis; Laurence Huang; Joseph A Kovacs; Henry Masur; Francis Mulindwa; Sally Opus; Yuenwah Chow; Patrick R Murray Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2009-03-18 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: L E A Kivihya-Ndugga; M R A van Cleeff; W A Githui; L W Nganga; D K Kibuga; J A Odhiambo; Paul R Klatser Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Karin Martin; Bernard Bégaud; Philippe Latry; Ghada Miremont-Salamé; Annie Fourrier; Nicholas Moore Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; Jeroen G Lijmer; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2003-01-07 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: W Worodria; J L Davis; A Cattamanchi; A Andama; S den Boon; S D Yoo; P C Hopewell; L Huang Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Adithya Cattamanchi; Laurence Huang; William Worodria; Saskia den Boon; Nelson Kalema; Winceslaus Katagira; Patrick Byanyima; Samuel Yoo; John Matovu; Philip C Hopewell; J Lucian Davis Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2010-09-17 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: H N Kisembo; S Den Boon; J L Davis; R Okello; W Worodria; A Cattamanchi; L Huang; M G Kawooya Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2011-10-05 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Sofya Tokman; Christopher F Barnett; Leah G Jarlsberg; Pam R Taub; Saskia den Boon; J Lucian Davis; Adithya Cattamanchi; William Worodria; Alan Maisel; Laurence Huang Journal: Respirology Date: 2014-01-26 Impact factor: 6.424
Authors: J Lucian Davis; William Worodria; Harriet Kisembo; John Z Metcalfe; Adithya Cattamanchi; Michael Kawooya; Rachel Kyeyune; Saskia den Boon; Krista Powell; Richard Okello; Samuel Yoo; Laurence Huang Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-03-26 Impact factor: 3.240