Literature DB >> 19722724

Public perceptions of the pharmaceutical industry and drug safety: implications for the pharmacovigilance professional and the culture of safety.

Axel K Olsen1, Matthew D Whalen.   

Abstract

A survey of the US public titled 'Consumer Perceptions on Drug Safety' was conducted in October 2006. The survey was undertaken at that time because of the heightened public awareness of drug safety concerns over rofecoxib (Vioxx(R)) and pediatric antidepressant use. The survey was designed with questions related to public perception of the pharmaceutical industry, the US FDA, Congress and whether the US public perceived there to be a safety crisis. The survey consisted of 1726 US men and women aged 18 years and over. The survey results showed that the FDA, Congress and US pharmaceutical companies are perceived as having a notable amount of responsibility to ensure safety (by 75%, 41% and 70% of respondents, respectively). Additionally, 96% of the survey respondents indicated that they had some level of concern about adverse reactions to prescription drugs that are taken as directed. Seventy-six percent of the respondents were 'fairly' to 'extremely' concerned about adverse reactions, while approximately 42% of the survey respondents' opinions ranged from 'somewhat distrusting' to 'strongly distrusting' of the pharmaceutical companies that develop drugs. These findings are comparable to those in surveys conducted by the Kaiser Family Foundation in 2005 and PriceWaterhouseCoopers in 2007. These surveys suggest that about half the respondents believe there is both the need and desire for reform in drug safety by the pharmaceutical industry and the FDA. In reports from 2006 and 2007, the Institute of Medicine challenges the healthcare system and the FDA to adopt the principles of the culture of safety. While there have been steps taken to address the recommendations of the reports, as exemplified by the FDA Amendment Act of 2007 and the Pharmacoepidemiological Research on Outcomes of Therapeutics by a European Consortium, true reform across the life sciences sector will only come through broad adoption of these principles. Thus, it is particularly important for individuals and healthcare providers to track and report safety-related events involving approved and unapproved indications and medication errors. Pharmacovigilance professionals provide the foundation upon which the principles of the culture of safety can be built.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19722724     DOI: 10.2165/11316620-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  1 in total

Review 1.  Guiding principles of safety as a basis for developing a pharmaceutical safety culture.

Authors:  Brian Edwards; Axel K Olsen; Matthew D Whalen; Marla J Gold
Journal:  Curr Drug Saf       Date:  2007-05
  1 in total
  15 in total

Review 1.  Risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS): educating the prescriber.

Authors:  Susan C Nicholson; Janet Peterson; Behin Yektashenas
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Industry Support of Medical Research: Important Opportunity or Treacherous Pitfall?

Authors:  William M Tierney; Eric M Meslin; Kurt Kroenke
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Expert testimony at the Food and Drug Administration: who wants the truth?

Authors:  Joel S Perlmutter
Journal:  Narrat Inq Bioeth       Date:  2011

Review 4.  Stem cell-derived hepatocytes as a predictive model for drug-induced liver injury: are we there yet?

Authors:  Richard Kia; Rowena L C Sison; James Heslop; Neil R Kitteringham; Neil Hanley; John S Mills; B Kevin Park; Chris E P Goldring
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Reducing Hepatocyte Injury and Necrosis in Response to Paracetamol Using Noncoding RNAs.

Authors:  Dagmara Szkolnicka; Baltasar Lucendo-Villarin; Joanna K Moore; Kenneth J Simpson; Stuart J Forbes; David C Hay
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 6.940

6.  Publication trends in newspapers and scientific journals for SSRIs and suicidality: a systematic longitudinal study.

Authors:  J F Hernandez; A K Mantel-Teeuwisse; G J M W van Thiel; S V Belitser; J A M Raaijmakers; T Pieters
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  MicroRNA-122: a novel hepatocyte-enriched in vitro marker of drug-induced cellular toxicity.

Authors:  Richard Kia; Lorna Kelly; Rowena L C Sison-Young; Fang Zhang; Chris S Pridgeon; James A Heslop; Pete Metcalfe; Neil R Kitteringham; Melissa Baxter; Sean Harrison; Neil A Hanley; Zoë D Burke; Mike P Storm; Melanie J Welham; David Tosh; Barbara Küppers-Munther; Josefina Edsbagge; Philip J Starkey Lewis; Frank Bonner; Ernie Harpur; James Sidaway; Joanne Bowes; Stephen W Fenwick; Hassan Malik; Chris E P Goldring; B Kevin Park
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Influence of the Business Revenue, Recommendation, and Provider Models on Mobile Health App Adoption: Three-Country Experimental Vignette Study.

Authors:  Francisco Lupiáñez-Villanueva; Frans Folkvord; Mariek Vanden Abeele
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 4.773

9.  Pharmaceutical company perspectives on current safety risk communications in Japan.

Authors:  Hisashi Urushihara; Gen Kobashi; Hideaki Masuda; Setsuko Taneichi; Michiko Yamamoto; Takeo Nakayama; Koji Kawakami; Tsutomu Matsuda; Kaori Ohta; Hiroki Sugimori
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-01-24

10.  Participants' perception of pharmaceutical clinical research: a cross-sectional controlled study.

Authors:  Gerardo González-Saldivar; René Rodríguez-Gutiérrez; José Luis Viramontes-Madrid; Alejandro Salcido-Montenegro; Kevin Erick Gabriel Carlos-Reyna; Andrés Marcelo Treviño-Alvarez; Neri Alejandro Álvarez-Villalobos; José Gerardo González-González
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.