Literature DB >> 19721050

A novel method of accurately calculating the radiological magnification of the hip.

R J King1, P Makrides, J A Gill, S Karthikeyan, S J Krikler, D R Griffin.   

Abstract

We have developed a novel method of calculating the radiological magnification of the hip using two separate radio-opaque markers. We recruited 74 patients undergoing radiological assessment following total hip replacement. Both the new double marker and a conventional single marker were used by the radiographer at the time of x-ray. The predicted magnification according to each marker was calculated, as was the true radiological magnification of the components. The correlation between true and predicted magnification was good using the double marker (r = 0.90, n = 74, p < 0.001), but only moderate for the single marker (r = 0.50, n = 63, p < 0.001). The median error was significantly less for the double marker than for the single (1.1% vs 4.8%, p < 0.001). The double marker method demonstrated excellent validity (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.89), in contrast to the single marker (0.32). The double marker method appears to be superior to the single marker method when used in the clinical environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19721050     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B9.22615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  8 in total

1.  Dual-position calibration markers for total hip arthroplasty: theoretical comparison to fixed calibration and single marker method.

Authors:  Christoph Kolja Boese; Sebastian Wilhelm; Stefan Haneder; Philipp Lechler; Peer Eysel; Jan Bredow
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Magnification error in digital radiographs of the cervical spine against magnetic resonance imaging measurements.

Authors:  Hideki Shigematsu; Munehisa Koizumi; Masana Yoneda; Jin Iida; Takuya Oshima; Yasuhito Tanaka
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2013-11-28

3.  Magnification assessment of radiographs for knee replacement (MARKeR) - A pilot study in a low-resource setting.

Authors:  Marlon M Mencia; Raakesh Goalan; Kimani White
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2022-04-19

4.  Crossover external fixator for acetabular fractures: a cadaver study.

Authors:  M Frank; V Dzupa; K Smejkal; V Baca; T Dedek
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.693

5.  The accuracy of external calibration markers in digital templating using the double marker and single marker method: a comparative study.

Authors:  Y Warschawski; I Shichman; S Morgan; O Shaked; S Garceau; N Amzallag; N Snir; A Gold
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  The 3-dot circle: A reliable method for safe and efficient digital templating of the acetabular component.

Authors:  Firas Arnaout; Varun Dewan; Christos Paliobeis
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-03-27

7.  Improving the accuracy of digital templating: achieving success through stakeholder management.

Authors:  Hammad Parwaiz; Boris Aliaga Crespo; Joshua Filer; Ashley Thorpe; Rosie Seatter; Dominique Suzanne Faulkner; Harvey Sandhu
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2019-06-12

8.  Magnification of digital hip radiographs differs between clinical workplaces.

Authors:  Jana Hornová; Pavel Růžička; Maroš Hrubina; Eduard Šťastný; Andrea Košková; Petr Fulín; Jiří Gallo; Matej Daniel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.