Literature DB >> 19716594

Single-port laparoscopic abdominal sacral colpopexy: initial experience and comparative outcomes.

Wesley M White1, Raj K Goel, Mia A Swartz, Courtenay Moore, Raymond R Rackley, Jihad H Kaouk.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and safety of single-port laparoscopic abdominal sacral colpopexy (ASC) for the treatment of female pelvic organ prolapse (POP).
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed to assess perioperative outcomes among women who were treated for symptomatic POP with laparoscopic, robotic, or single-port laparoscopic ASC. All patients underwent preoperative history and physical examination including POP quantification (POP-Q) staging and urodynamics. ASC with or without anti-incontinence surgery was performed via the aforementioned approaches. Demographic and perioperative data were obtained. Patients were followed up postoperatively at 3 and 6 months with POP-Q evaluation. Statistical analysis was performed.
RESULTS: From October 2005 to July 2008, 30 female patients with symptomatic Stage II (6 patients), Stage III (23 patients), or Stage IV (1 patient) POP were treated with laparoscopic (10), robotic (10), or single-port laparoscopic (10) ASC. Mean age of the entire cohort was 61.1 years. Mean body mass index was 26.7 kg/m(2). Seventeen patients demonstrated stress urinary incontinence and underwent concomitant sling placement. No intraoperative complications were encountered. No significant difference was noted in the 3 cohorts with respect to operative time, blood loss, mean visual analog pain score at discharge, or duration of hospitalization. At 6 months following surgery, 27 patients underwent follow-up POP-Q, with all patients demonstrating excellent apical support and prolapse reduction.
CONCLUSIONS: Single-port laparoscopic ASC offers comparable efficacy and superior cosmesis compared to alternative approaches. Long-term follow-up is needed to confirm durability of repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19716594     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.02.086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  10 in total

Review 1.  Pure single-port laparoscopic surgery or mix of techniques?

Authors:  Evangelos Liatsikos; Iason Kyriazis; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Minh Do; Anja Dietel; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Robot-assisted surgery:--impact on gynaecological and pelvic floor reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  O E O'Sullivan; B A O'Reilly
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Selection of a port for use in laparoendoscopic single-site surgery.

Authors:  Rakesh Khanna; Michael A White; Riccardo Autorino; Humberto K Laydner; Wahib Isac; Bo Yang; Fatih Altunrende; Shahab P Hillyer; Gregory Spana; Georges-Pascal Haber; Jihad H Kaouk; Robert J Stein
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Advances in laparoscopic surgery in urology.

Authors:  Jens J Rassweiler; Dogu Teber
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Prospective comparison of short-term functional outcomes obtained after pure laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Julien Seror; David R Yates; Elise Seringe; Christophe Vaessen; Marc-Olivier Bitker; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Current status of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urologic surgery.

Authors:  Tae Hee Oh
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2012-07-19

7.  Laparoendoscopic single-site retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: a matched-pair comparison with the gold standard.

Authors:  Tao-ping Shi; Xu Zhang; Xin Ma; Hong-zhao Li; Jie Zhu; Bao-jun Wang; Jiang-ping Gao; Wei Cai; Juan Dong
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) sacrocolpopexy: feasibility and efficacy of knotless procedure performed with conventional instruments.

Authors:  Andre Luiz Farinhas Tome; Marcos Tobias-Machado; Walter Fernandes Correa
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Is LESS really more?

Authors:  Joseph A Graversen; Achim Lusch; Jaime Landman
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2012-01

10.  Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery with the second-generation single port instrument delivery extended reach surgical system in a porcine model.

Authors:  Soo Dong Kim; Jaime Landman; Gyung Tak Sung
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-05-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.