Literature DB >> 19716227

Expression of the androgen-regulated fusion gene TMPRSS2-ERG does not predict response to endocrine treatment in hormone-naïve, node-positive prostate cancer.

Joost L Boormans1, Karin G Hermans, Angelique C J Ziel-van der Made, Geert J H L van Leenders, Mark F Wildhagen, Laurence Collette, Fritz H Schröder, Jan Trapman, Paul C M S Verhagen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fusion of the androgen-regulated gene transmembrane protease, serine 2, TMPRSS2, to the v-ets erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog (avian), ERG, of the erythroblast transformation-specific (ETS) family is the most common genetic alteration in prostate cancer (PCa).
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether expression of androgen-regulated TMPRSS2-ERG predicts response to endocrine treatment in hormone-naïve, node-positive PCa. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-five patients with histologically confirmed, node-positive PCa who were without treatment at the moment of lymph node dissection were analysed. RNA was isolated from the paraffin-embedded lymph node metastases and complementary DNA (cDNA) was made. The quality of cDNA was tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of the expression of the housekeeping gene hydroxymethylbilane synthase, HMBS (formerly PBGD). TMPRSS2-ERG expression was analysed by PCR using a forward primer in TMPRSS2 exon 1 and a reverse primer in ERG exon 4. MEASUREMENTS: The primary end point was time from start of endocrine therapy to the occurrence of three consecutive rises in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) that were at least 2 wk apart and resulted in two 50% increases over the PSA nadir. Secondary end points were time to PSA nadir after start of endocrine treatment and cancer-specific and overall survival. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: TMPRSS2-ERG was expressed in 59% of the 71 patients who could be analysed. Median duration of response to endocrine therapy was 20.9 mo versus 24.1 mo for gene fusion-positive versus gene fusion-negative patients (95% confidence intervals: 18.6-23.1 vs 18.9-29.4, p=0.70). Furthermore, no significant differences were seen between the two groups for the secondary end points.
CONCLUSIONS: Expression of TMPRSS2-ERG is frequent in lymph node metastases of patients with untreated PCa; however, expression of this androgen-regulated fusion gene did not correspond with duration of response to endocrine therapy. Our results suggest that expression of TMPRSS2-ERG is not a candidate marker to select for metastatic PCa patients who will benefit more from endocrine treatment.
Copyright © 2009 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19716227     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  14 in total

1.  The TMPRSS2:ERG fusion and response to androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca E Graff; Andreas Pettersson; Rosina T Lis; Natalie DuPre; Kristina M Jordahl; Elizabeth Nuttall; Jennifer R Rider; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Howard D Sesso; Stacey A Kenfield; Massimo Loda; Edward L Giovannucci; Bernard Rosner; Paul L Nguyen; Christopher J Sweeney; Lorelei A Mucci
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 2.  The ETS family of oncogenic transcription factors in solid tumours.

Authors:  Gina M Sizemore; Jason R Pitarresi; Subhasree Balakrishnan; Michael C Ostrowski
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 3.  Recurrent rearrangements in prostate cancer: causes and therapeutic potential.

Authors:  Nicole M White; Felix Y Feng; Christopher A Maher
Journal:  Curr Drug Targets       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.465

4.  The TMPRSS2:ERG rearrangement, ERG expression, and prostate cancer outcomes: a cohort study and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andreas Pettersson; Rebecca E Graff; Scott R Bauer; Michael J Pitt; Rosina T Lis; Edward C Stack; Neil E Martin; Lauren Kunz; Kathryn L Penney; Azra H Ligon; Catherine Suppan; Richard Flavin; Howard D Sesso; Jennifer R Rider; Christopher Sweeney; Meir J Stampfer; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Philip W Kantoff; Martin G Sanda; Edward L Giovannucci; Eric L Ding; Massimo Loda; Lorelei A Mucci
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 5.  ERG expression in prostate cancer: biological relevance and clinical implication.

Authors:  Hatem Abou-Ouf; Liena Zhao; Tarek A Bismar
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  ERG cooperates with androgen receptor in regulating trefoil factor 3 in prostate cancer disease progression.

Authors:  David S Rickman; Ying-Bei Chen; Samprit Banerjee; Yihang Pan; Jindan Yu; Terry Vuong; Sven Perner; Christopher J Lafargue; Kirsten D Mertz; Sunita R Setlur; Kanishka Sircar; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Tarek A Bismar; Mark A Rubin; Francesca Demichelis
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.715

7.  Calcium Channel Blocker Use and Risk of Prostate Cancer by TMPRSS2:ERG Gene Fusion Status.

Authors:  Milan S Geybels; Karen D McCloskey; Ian G Mills; Janet L Stanford
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.104

8.  Loss of PTEN is associated with aggressive behavior in ERG-positive prostate cancer.

Authors:  Katri A Leinonen; Outi R Saramäki; Bungo Furusato; Takahiro Kimura; Hiroyuki Takahashi; Shin Egawa; Hiroyoshi Suzuki; Kerri Keiger; Sung Ho Hahm; William B Isaacs; Teemu T Tolonen; Ulf-Håkan Stenman; Teuvo L J Tammela; Matti Nykter; G Steven Bova; Tapio Visakorpi
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Tissue-based biomarkers in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Timothy N Clinton; Aditya Bagrodia; Yair Lotan; Vitaly Margulis; Ganesh V Raj; Solomon L Woldu
Journal:  Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev       Date:  2017-09-05

Review 10.  Molecular pathways: targeting ETS gene fusions in cancer.

Authors:  Felix Y Feng; J Chad Brenner; Maha Hussain; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.