Wendy M Smith1, Terence M Davidson, Claire Murphy. 1. Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Continuing Medical Education, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA 92103-8895, USA. wmsmith@ucsd.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: 1. Characterize patient visits for chronic rhinosinusitis on the basis of age, gender, race, diagnostic services, and medication use. 2. Evaluate regional differences in patient visits for chronic rhinosinusitis. STUDY DESIGN: Analysis of cross-sectional survey data from two national databases of ambulatory medical encounters. SETTING: Not applicable. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Four years (2003-2006) of data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey were analyzed. Visits involving chronic rhinosinusitis were identified by using reported diagnostic codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision. They were weighted to provide national estimates of care. Data were analyzed with the Pearson chi(2) test using the SPSS 16.2 Complex Samples Module, taking into account the complex survey design and multiple time periods. RESULTS: A total of 4617 patient visits for chronic rhinosinusitis were identified, accounting for 1.95 percent of all visits. With the application of weights to this sample, these visits represent 91.2 million national visits. A significantly higher proportion of visits in the South involved African Americans (Pearson chi(2) = 69.5, F = 6.7, df = 2.8, 2118, P < 0.01). Significantly fewer diagnostic services were provided or ordered in the Northeast (Pearson chi(2) = 64.8, F = 4.0, df = 4.3, 3247, P < 0.01). Providers in the Northeast were also significantly less likely to order or renew more than three medications at the visit (Pearson chi(2) = 54.0, F = 3.1, df = 2.6, 1930, P < 0.05). No regional differences were seen for age, gender, or setting type. CONCLUSION: Significant regional variations exist for chronic rhinosinusitis in patient demographics, diagnosis, and management. Continuing research is needed to refine physician awareness, evaluation, and treatment of this disorder.
OBJECTIVES: 1. Characterize patient visits for chronic rhinosinusitis on the basis of age, gender, race, diagnostic services, and medication use. 2. Evaluate regional differences in patient visits for chronic rhinosinusitis. STUDY DESIGN: Analysis of cross-sectional survey data from two national databases of ambulatory medical encounters. SETTING: Not applicable. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Four years (2003-2006) of data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey were analyzed. Visits involving chronic rhinosinusitis were identified by using reported diagnostic codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision. They were weighted to provide national estimates of care. Data were analyzed with the Pearson chi(2) test using the SPSS 16.2 Complex Samples Module, taking into account the complex survey design and multiple time periods. RESULTS: A total of 4617 patient visits for chronic rhinosinusitis were identified, accounting for 1.95 percent of all visits. With the application of weights to this sample, these visits represent 91.2 million national visits. A significantly higher proportion of visits in the South involved African Americans (Pearson chi(2) = 69.5, F = 6.7, df = 2.8, 2118, P < 0.01). Significantly fewer diagnostic services were provided or ordered in the Northeast (Pearson chi(2) = 64.8, F = 4.0, df = 4.3, 3247, P < 0.01). Providers in the Northeast were also significantly less likely to order or renew more than three medications at the visit (Pearson chi(2) = 54.0, F = 3.1, df = 2.6, 1930, P < 0.05). No regional differences were seen for age, gender, or setting type. CONCLUSION: Significant regional variations exist for chronic rhinosinusitis in patient demographics, diagnosis, and management. Continuing research is needed to refine physician awareness, evaluation, and treatment of this disorder.
Authors: Michael P Murphy; Paul Fishman; Steven O Short; Sean D Sullivan; Bevan Yueh; Ernest A Weymuller Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Michael S Benninger; Berrylin J Ferguson; James A Hadley; Daniel L Hamilos; Michael Jacobs; David W Kennedy; Donald C Lanza; Bradley F Marple; J David Osguthorpe; James A Stankiewicz; Jack Anon; James Denneny; Ivor Emanuel; Howard Levine Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: B J Ferguson; L Barnes; J M Bernstein; D Brown; C E Clark; P R Cook; W S DeWitt; S M Graham; B Gordon; A R Javer; J H Krouse; F A Kuhn; H L Levine; S C Manning; B F Marple; A H Morgan; J D Osguthorpe; D Skedros; B M Rains; H H Ramadan; J E Terrell; A J Yonkers Journal: Otolaryngol Clin North Am Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 3.346
Authors: Elliott S Fisher; David E Wennberg; Thérèse A Stukel; Daniel J Gottlieb; F L Lucas; Etoile L Pinder Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2003-02-18 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Elliott S Fisher; David E Wennberg; Thérèse A Stukel; Daniel J Gottlieb; F L Lucas; Etoile L Pinder Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2003-02-18 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: B A Stuck; C Bachert; P Federspil; W Hosemann; L Klimek; R Mösges; O Pfaar; C Rudack; H Sitter; M Wagenmann; R Weber; K Hörmann Journal: HNO Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 1.284
Authors: David C Lin; Rakesh K Chandra; Bruce K Tan; Whitney Zirkle; David B Conley; Leslie C Grammer; Robert C Kern; Robert P Schleimer; Anju T Peters Journal: Am J Rhinol Allergy Date: 2011 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.467
Authors: H S Cohen; M G Stewart; A E Brissett; K L Olson; M Takashima; H Sangi-Haghpeykar Journal: ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec Date: 2010-04-24 Impact factor: 1.538
Authors: Bruce K Tan; Rakesh K Chandra; Jonathan Pollak; Atsushi Kato; David B Conley; Anju T Peters; Leslie C Grammer; Pedro C Avila; Robert C Kern; Walter F Stewart; Robert P Schleimer; Brian S Schwartz Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2013-03-28 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Rakesh K Chandra; David Lin; Bruce Tan; Robin Smolak Tudor; David B Conley; Anju T Peters; Leslie C Grammer; Robert P Schleimer; Robert C Kern Journal: Am J Otolaryngol Date: 2010-09-15 Impact factor: 1.808
Authors: Stephanie Shintani Smith; Robert C Kern; Rakesh K Chandra; Bruce K Tan; Charlesnika T Evans Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2013-03-05 Impact factor: 3.497