BACKGROUND: An academic surgeon's workweek is divided among patient care, administrative duties, education, and research. The time available for research activities may change as a surgeon's career evolves. We sought to determine involvement of academic surgeons in research and to assess how this research endeavor was affected by demographic and workplace characteristics. METHODS: We constructed a survey to explore the following 4 domains: demographics, time allotment, research activities, and effects of stressors. We distributed the survey to members of the Society of University Surgeons. In addition to performing descriptive statistics, we defined an active researcher as someone with a funding source who devoted 15% or more work hours to research. Using this definition, we performed statistical analyses to assess the significance of independent variables on research. Stress factors were evaluated on a Likert scale with responses ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely). RESULTS: We received 314 completed surveys (response rate 23%). Of the respondents, 274 (87%) stated that they were involved in some kind of research activity; however, only 143 (46%) were active researchers. Using univariate logistic regression analysis, younger respondents and surgeons who practiced for more than 10 years were more likely to be active researchers (odds ratio [OR]: 1.93, confidence interval [CI]: 1.51-2.46 and OR: 2.06, CI: 1.64-2.59, respectively). Males were less likely than females to be active researchers (OR: 0.32, CI: 016-0.67); however, by multivariate analysis, we found that the "years in practice" of an active researcher was the most significant predictor of research activity, whereas age and sex were not. In regard to stress, most respondents reported scores of 1-3 for all 7 stressors, which is consistent with minimal to moderate stress. CONCLUSION: Academic surgeons are involved actively in research; however, this involvement decreases as other professional responsibilities increase. To optimize the surgical research environment, departments should invest time and resources in young investigators to prevent them from decreasing their research activities.
BACKGROUND: An academic surgeon's workweek is divided among patient care, administrative duties, education, and research. The time available for research activities may change as a surgeon's career evolves. We sought to determine involvement of academic surgeons in research and to assess how this research endeavor was affected by demographic and workplace characteristics. METHODS: We constructed a survey to explore the following 4 domains: demographics, time allotment, research activities, and effects of stressors. We distributed the survey to members of the Society of University Surgeons. In addition to performing descriptive statistics, we defined an active researcher as someone with a funding source who devoted 15% or more work hours to research. Using this definition, we performed statistical analyses to assess the significance of independent variables on research. Stress factors were evaluated on a Likert scale with responses ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely). RESULTS: We received 314 completed surveys (response rate 23%). Of the respondents, 274 (87%) stated that they were involved in some kind of research activity; however, only 143 (46%) were active researchers. Using univariate logistic regression analysis, younger respondents and surgeons who practiced for more than 10 years were more likely to be active researchers (odds ratio [OR]: 1.93, confidence interval [CI]: 1.51-2.46 and OR: 2.06, CI: 1.64-2.59, respectively). Males were less likely than females to be active researchers (OR: 0.32, CI: 016-0.67); however, by multivariate analysis, we found that the "years in practice" of an active researcher was the most significant predictor of research activity, whereas age and sex were not. In regard to stress, most respondents reported scores of 1-3 for all 7 stressors, which is consistent with minimal to moderate stress. CONCLUSION: Academic surgeons are involved actively in research; however, this involvement decreases as other professional responsibilities increase. To optimize the surgical research environment, departments should invest time and resources in young investigators to prevent them from decreasing their research activities.
Authors: Rebeccah B Baucom; Irene D Feurer; Julia S Shelton; Kristy Kummerow; Michael D Holzman; Benjamin K Poulose Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2015-06-20 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Sundeep G Keswani; Chad M Moles; Michael Morowitz; Herbert Zeh; John S Kuo; Matthew H Levine; Lily S Cheng; David J Hackam; Nita Ahuja; Allan M Goldstein Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Teresa M Bell; Nakul Valsangkar; Mugdha Joshi; John Mayo; Casi Blanton; Teresa A Zimmers; Laura Torbeck; Leonidas G Koniaris Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Bernadette J Goudreau; Taryn E Hassinger; Traci L Hedrick; Craig L Slingluff; Anneke T Schroen; Lynn T Dengel Journal: Surgery Date: 2018-06-19 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Troy A Markel; Nakul P Valsangkar; Teresa M Bell; Brandon A Kiel; Teresa A Zimmers; Leonidas G Koniaris Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2016-12-20 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Hunter B Moore; Ernest E Moore; Mark R Nehler; Lisa C Cicutto; Anthony W Bacon; Claire Travis; Richard D Schulick Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Marc H F Schreinemacher; Richard P ten Broek; Erica A Bakkum; Harry van Goor; Nicole D Bouvy Journal: World J Surg Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Alp Sener; Colin C. Anderson; Francois A. Auger; Jake Barralet; Mary Brindle; Francisco S. Cayabyab; Michael G. Fehlings; Louis Lacombe; Louis P. Perrault; Robert Sabbagh; Andrew J.E. Seely; Christopher Wallace; James Ellsmere; Richard Keijzer Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2019-12-01 Impact factor: 2.089