Literature DB >> 19713032

Definition of contrast enhancement phases of the liver using a perfluoro-based microbubble agent, perflubutane microbubbles.

Sasaki Shunichi1, Iijima Hiroko, Moriyasu Fuminori, Hidehiko Waki.   

Abstract

To define the contrast enhancement phases in the liver with perflubutane microbubbles, the liver enhancement time-intensity curves were investigated in 14 healthy volunteers. The agent was injected intravenously as a bolus and the liver was imaged with an ultrasound scanner as long as 4h after the injection. Time-intensity curves from the hepatic artery, the intrahepatic portal vein, the hepatic vein and the parenchyma of the liver were obtained from the liver ultrasound images. The arrival of the agent in the hepatic artery, the portal vein and the hepatic vein were visually distinguishable and the mean arrival times were 19.2, 24.3 and 32.2 s after the injection, respectively. The signal intensity in these vessels increased rapidly after the arrival of the contrast and gradually reverted to baseline after the peak. In contrast, within 5 min after the injection, the intensity in the parenchyma increased and reached a plateau, which persisted for at least 2h. The contrast enhancement phases in the liver with perflubutane microbubbles could be defined as two major phases-a vascular phase, in which the vessels are enhanced between 15 s and 10 min after injection, and a Kupffer phase, in which the parenchyma is enhanced 10 min after injection. The vascular phase is divided into three subphases: the arterial phase (15 to 45 s after injection); the portal phase (45 s to 1 min after injection); and the vasculo-Kupffer phase (1 to 10 min after injection).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19713032     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  17 in total

1.  Value of post-vascular phase (Kupffer imaging) by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography using Sonazoid in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Eriko Goto; Ryota Masuzaki; Ryosuke Tateishi; Yuji Kondo; Jun Imamura; Tadashi Goto; Hitoshi Ikeda; Masaaki Akahane; Shuichiro Shiina; Masao Omata; Haruhiko Yoshida; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  Effect of obstructive jaundice on hepatic hemodynamics: use of Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasonography in a prospective study of the blood flow balance between the hepatic portal vein and hepatic artery.

Authors:  Noritaka Wakui; Yuki Takeda; Shuta Nishinakagawa; Nobuo Ueki; Takafumi Otsuka; Nobuyuki Oba; Hiroshi Hashimoto; Naohisa Kamiyama; Yasukiyo Sumino; Tatsuya Kojima
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 1.314

3.  Quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging: a review of sources of variability.

Authors:  M-X Tang; H Mulvana; T Gauthier; A K P Lim; D O Cosgrove; R J Eckersley; E Stride
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Low mechanical index contrast mode versus high mechanical index contrast mode: which is a more sensitive method for detecting Sonazoid microbubbles in the liver of normal subjects?

Authors:  Hiromi Nihonmatsu; Kazushi Numata; Hiroyuki Fukuda; Katsuaki Tanaka; Mari Ooba; Shin Maeda
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 5.  Ultrasound diagnostic criteria for hepatic tumors.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.314

6.  A case of poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma with intriguing ultrasonography findings.

Authors:  Noritaka Wakui; Ryuji Takayama; Yasushi Matsukiyo; Takanori Mukouzu; Masahiro Kanayama; Masayoshi Takahashi; Hidenari Nagai; Manabu Watanabe; Kenichi Maruyama; Masahiro Kaneko; Kazutoshi Shibuya; Yasukiyo Sumino
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 7.  Contrast Agents for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Imaging: Value and Progression.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Kazushi Numata; Yuewu Du; Shin Maeda
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 8.  Role of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with Sonazoid for hepatocellular carcinoma: evidence from a 10-year experience.

Authors:  Hitoshi Maruyama; Tadashi Sekimoto; Osamu Yokosuka
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 6.772

Review 9.  Hepatic hemangioma -review-.

Authors:  N Bajenaru; V Balaban; F Săvulescu; I Campeanu; T Patrascu
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2015

10.  Arrival time parametric imaging of the hemodynamic balance changes between the hepatic artery and the portal vein during deep inspiration, using Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasonography: A case of Budd-Chiari syndrome.

Authors:  Noritaka Wakui; Ryuji Takayama; Yasushi Matsukiyo; Naohisa Kamiyama; Kojiro Kobayashi; Takanori Mukozu; Shigeru Nakano; Takashi Ikehara; Hidenari Nagai; Yoshinori Igarashi; Yasukiyo Sumino
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.