Literature DB >> 19712698

Comparative evaluation of two automated systems for nucleic acid extraction of BK virus: NucliSens easyMAG versus BioRobot MDx.

Sollip Kim1, Sook-Ja Park, Seung Namgoong, Heungsup Sung, Mi-Na Kim.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the performance of two automated nucleic acid extraction systems. Specifically, the NucliSens easyMAG system (bioMerieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France), which incorporates magnetic bead technology, was compared with the BioRobot MDx system (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany), which uses a silica membrane-based method of nucleic acid extraction. Nucleic acids from the BK virus (BKV DNA) were extracted from 98 plasma and 57 urine specimens using the Real-Q BKV quantitation kit (Biosewoom, Seoul, Korea). Failed PCR was defined as negative BKV DNA results having more than 36 threshold cycles of the internal control by the manufacturer's instruction. The PCR failure rate of nucleic acids isolated from plasma samples using the MDx system was similar to that of plasma samples processed using the easyMAG system (2.0% and 3.1%, respectively). The PCR failure rate of nucleic acids isolated from urine samples using the MDx system was higher than that of urine samples processed using the easyMAG system (33.3% and 12.5%, respectively). These data suggest that the PCR inhibitors present in urine specimens are removed more efficiently by the easyMAG system. Among amplified specimens, the discordant results obtained from the two systems revealed that the BKV DNA load ranged from 2.3 log10 copies/mL to 4.6 log10 copies/mL. Of the 25 urine specimens that yielded BKV DNA by both extraction systems, 15 specimens (60.0%) yielded higher BKV DNA loads by the easyMAG system, indicating that the easyMAG system extracted nucleic acid more efficiently than did the MDx system. In conclusion, the easyMAG method outperformed the MDx method when used to extract BKV DNA from urine samples. Magnetic bead-based extraction methods such as the easyMAG system are therefore preferable for the quantitation of viral DNA in urine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19712698     DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2009.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Virol Methods        ISSN: 0166-0934            Impact factor:   2.014


  4 in total

1.  High-throughput direct fecal PCR assay for detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in sheep and cattle.

Authors:  Karren M Plain; Ian B Marsh; Anna M Waldron; Francesca Galea; Ann-Michele Whittington; Vanessa F Saunders; Douglas J Begg; Kumudika de Silva; Auriol C Purdie; Richard J Whittington
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of eMAG™ versus NucliSENS® EasyMAG® performance on clinical specimens.

Authors:  Magali Garcia; Céline Chessa; Anne Bourgoin; Geneviève Giraudeau; Chloé Plouzeau; Gérard Agius; Nicolas Lévêque; Agnès Beby-Defaux
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2017-01-29       Impact factor: 3.168

3.  Quantitative detection of epstein-barr virus DNA in cerebrospinal fluid and blood samples of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Clementina E Cocuzza; Fabrizio Piazza; Rosario Musumeci; Davide Oggioni; Simona Andreoni; Margherita Gardinetti; Letizia Fusco; Maura Frigo; Paola Banfi; Maria R Rottoli; Paolo Confalonieri; Monica Rezzonico; Maria T Ferrò; Guido Cavaletti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  COVID-19 Molecular Testing in Korea: Practical Essentials and Answers From Experts Based on Experiences of Emergency Use Authorization Assays.

Authors:  Heungsup Sung; Kyoung Ho Roh; Ki Ho Hong; Moon-Woo Seong; Namhee Ryoo; Hyun Soo Kim; Jaehyeon Lee; So Yeon Kim; Sook Won Ryu; Mi-Na Kim; Myung Guk Han; Sang Won Lee; Hyukmin Lee; Cheon Kwon Yoo
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 3.464

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.