Literature DB >> 19712542

Delusions and belief flexibility in psychosis.

S M Colbert1, E R Peters, P A Garety.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: A defining characteristic of delusions is inflexibility. However, it is not known if this is specific to the deluded individual's thinking about delusional beliefs, or whether this might apply more generally to the thinking style of people with delusions.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional design was employed comparing belief flexibility, belief dimensions, and extreme responding (ER) across three groups.
METHODS: Belief flexibility and dimensions were assessed for two types of beliefs, personally meaningful beliefs (delusional or idiosyncratic beliefs) and standard beliefs. The number of extreme responses endorsed on a questionnaire was also measured. Participants consisted of a currently deluded group (N=17), a remitted delusions group (N=17), both recruited from an early psychosis service, and a non-clinical control group (N=35).
RESULTS: Personally meaningful beliefs, whether delusions or other idiosyncratic beliefs, were held with equal conviction and belief flexibility in the three groups. However, on the standard belief, the clinical groups showed less belief flexibility than the control group (with only the remitted group significantly so) and greater ER. Individuals who showed belief flexibility about both types of beliefs displayed less ER than those who were inflexible, and belief flexibility was related to less delusional conviction in the clinical groups.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that belief inflexibility and ER may be characteristics of the thinking styles of individuals with delusions, rather than being specific to the delusional beliefs themselves. This has implications for cognitive behavioural therapy, which might usefully focus on generally thinking style as a preparation for working more directly with delusional beliefs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19712542     DOI: 10.1348/147608309X467320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Psychother        ISSN: 1476-0835            Impact factor:   3.915


  11 in total

Review 1.  Dual-process theory, conflict processing, and delusional belief.

Authors:  Michael V Bronstein; Gordon Pennycook; Jutta Joormann; Philip R Corlett; Tyrone D Cannon
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2019-06-12

2.  Avoidance of accelerated aging in schizophrenia?: Clinical and biological characterization of an exceptionally high functioning individual.

Authors:  Barton W Palmer; Raeanne C Moore; Lisa T Eyler; Luz L Pinto; Elyn R Saks; Dilip V Jeste
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Dopaminergic modulation of probabilistic reasoning and overconfidence in errors: a double-blind study.

Authors:  Christina Andreou; Steffen Moritz; Kristina Veith; Ruth Veckenstedt; Dieter Naber
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 9.306

4.  Jumping to conclusions style along the continuum of delusions: delusion-prone individuals are not hastier in decision making than healthy individuals.

Authors:  Suzanne Ho-wai So; Nate Tsz-kit Kwok
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Orbitofrontal cortex, emotional decision-making and response to cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis.

Authors:  Preethi Premkumar; Dominic Fannon; Adegboyega Sapara; Emmanuelle R Peters; Anantha P Anilkumar; Andrew Simmons; Elizabeth Kuipers; Veena Kumari
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 3.222

6.  Data-Gathering, Belief Flexibility, and Reasoning Across the Psychosis Continuum.

Authors:  Thomas Ward; Emmanuelle Peters; Mike Jackson; Fern Day; Philippa A Garety
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 9.306

7.  Can cognitive insight predict symptom remission in a first episode psychosis cohort?

Authors:  Jennifer A O'Connor; Lyn Ellett; Olesya Ajnakina; Tabea Schoeler; Anna Kollliakou; Antonella Trotta; Benjamin D Wiffen; Aurora M Falcone; Marta Di Forti; Robin M Murray; Sagnik Bhattacharyya; Anthony S David
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 8.  Fast and slow thinking in distressing delusions: A review of the literature and implications for targeted therapy.

Authors:  Thomas Ward; Philippa A Garety
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Jumping to conclusions, a lack of belief flexibility and delusional conviction in psychosis: a longitudinal investigation of the structure, frequency, and relatedness of reasoning biases.

Authors:  Suzanne H So; Daniel Freeman; Graham Dunn; Shitij Kapur; Elizabeth Kuipers; Paul Bebbington; David Fowler; Philippa A Garety
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2011-09-12

10.  Cognitive mechanisms of change in delusions: an experimental investigation targeting reasoning to effect change in paranoia.

Authors:  Philippa Garety; Helen Waller; Richard Emsley; Suzanne Jolley; Elizabeth Kuipers; Paul Bebbington; Graham Dunn; David Fowler; Amy Hardy; Daniel Freeman
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 9.306

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.