S M Colbert1, E R Peters, P A Garety. 1. Department of Psychology, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, London SE5 8AF, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: A defining characteristic of delusions is inflexibility. However, it is not known if this is specific to the deluded individual's thinking about delusional beliefs, or whether this might apply more generally to the thinking style of people with delusions. DESIGN: A cross-sectional design was employed comparing belief flexibility, belief dimensions, and extreme responding (ER) across three groups. METHODS: Belief flexibility and dimensions were assessed for two types of beliefs, personally meaningful beliefs (delusional or idiosyncratic beliefs) and standard beliefs. The number of extreme responses endorsed on a questionnaire was also measured. Participants consisted of a currently deluded group (N=17), a remitted delusions group (N=17), both recruited from an early psychosis service, and a non-clinical control group (N=35). RESULTS: Personally meaningful beliefs, whether delusions or other idiosyncratic beliefs, were held with equal conviction and belief flexibility in the three groups. However, on the standard belief, the clinical groups showed less belief flexibility than the control group (with only the remitted group significantly so) and greater ER. Individuals who showed belief flexibility about both types of beliefs displayed less ER than those who were inflexible, and belief flexibility was related to less delusional conviction in the clinical groups. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that belief inflexibility and ER may be characteristics of the thinking styles of individuals with delusions, rather than being specific to the delusional beliefs themselves. This has implications for cognitive behavioural therapy, which might usefully focus on generally thinking style as a preparation for working more directly with delusional beliefs.
OBJECTIVES: A defining characteristic of delusions is inflexibility. However, it is not known if this is specific to the deluded individual's thinking about delusional beliefs, or whether this might apply more generally to the thinking style of people with delusions. DESIGN: A cross-sectional design was employed comparing belief flexibility, belief dimensions, and extreme responding (ER) across three groups. METHODS: Belief flexibility and dimensions were assessed for two types of beliefs, personally meaningful beliefs (delusional or idiosyncratic beliefs) and standard beliefs. The number of extreme responses endorsed on a questionnaire was also measured. Participants consisted of a currently deluded group (N=17), a remitted delusions group (N=17), both recruited from an early psychosis service, and a non-clinical control group (N=35). RESULTS: Personally meaningful beliefs, whether delusions or other idiosyncratic beliefs, were held with equal conviction and belief flexibility in the three groups. However, on the standard belief, the clinical groups showed less belief flexibility than the control group (with only the remitted group significantly so) and greater ER. Individuals who showed belief flexibility about both types of beliefs displayed less ER than those who were inflexible, and belief flexibility was related to less delusional conviction in the clinical groups. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that belief inflexibility and ER may be characteristics of the thinking styles of individuals with delusions, rather than being specific to the delusional beliefs themselves. This has implications for cognitive behavioural therapy, which might usefully focus on generally thinking style as a preparation for working more directly with delusional beliefs.
Authors: Barton W Palmer; Raeanne C Moore; Lisa T Eyler; Luz L Pinto; Elyn R Saks; Dilip V Jeste Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2017-08-08 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Jennifer A O'Connor; Lyn Ellett; Olesya Ajnakina; Tabea Schoeler; Anna Kollliakou; Antonella Trotta; Benjamin D Wiffen; Aurora M Falcone; Marta Di Forti; Robin M Murray; Sagnik Bhattacharyya; Anthony S David Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2017-02-06 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Suzanne H So; Daniel Freeman; Graham Dunn; Shitij Kapur; Elizabeth Kuipers; Paul Bebbington; David Fowler; Philippa A Garety Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2011-09-12
Authors: Philippa Garety; Helen Waller; Richard Emsley; Suzanne Jolley; Elizabeth Kuipers; Paul Bebbington; Graham Dunn; David Fowler; Amy Hardy; Daniel Freeman Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2014-07-21 Impact factor: 9.306