Literature DB >> 19712011

Determinants of willingness to pay for a new therapy in a sample of menopausal-aged women.

Andrej Rasch1, Jan-Marc Hodek, Claus Runge, Wolfgang Greiner.   

Abstract

Menopause is a natural physiological event that usually begins in women between the ages of 48 and 55 years. In many cases, this event is associated with unpleasant somatic-vegetative, urogenital or psychological symptoms. To test the health and social demographic factors (especially household income level) that influence willingness to pay (WTP) for a new hormone-free treatment in women of menopausal age. 1365 women between the ages of 45 and 73 years were surveyed about their health and WTP for the new treatment. WTP was evaluated with a closed-ended binary questionnaire (four groups with different levels of co-payment between euro15 and euro60), using the contingent valuation method. The average WTP was calculated according to the area under the demand function. Factors contributing to payment readiness were examined by means of binary logistic regression. WTP was significantly affected by women's opinion of the new medication, the level of co-payment required, net household income, whether currently in treatment for menopausal symptoms, and Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) values. Compared with other factors, the level of co-payment was predicted to have a negative impact on WTP. Income level is an important factor in WTP and correlates highly with several other health-related variables (WHO-5 index, MRS value, receipt of other menopause medicines and existing co-morbidity). The average co-payment that our group of women was willing to pay was between euro17 and euro35 per month, or euro24 to euro42 for women who were currently receiving treatment for symptoms of menopause. While interpreting the results, it should be considered that the hypothetical therapy was assumed to be a new non-reimbursable alternative to conventional therapy offered under the existing statutory framework for health insurance in Germany. Despite some methodological limitations, these results are useful for examining the factors affecting WTP and incremental utilities for future medicine dealing with menopause.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19712011     DOI: 10.2165/11312740-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  35 in total

1.  The Menopause Rating Scale (MRS): comparison with Kupperman index and quality-of-life scale SF-36.

Authors:  H P Schneider; L A Heinemann; H P Rosemeier; P Potthoff; H M Behre
Journal:  Climacteric       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.005

Review 2.  Willingness to pay for antihypertensive therapy--further results.

Authors:  M Johannesson; P O Johansson; B Kriström; U G Gerdtham
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Benefit evaluation of mass screening for prostate cancer: willingness-to-pay measurement using contingent valuation.

Authors:  Hideo Yasunaga; Hiroo Ide; Tomoaki Imamura; Kazuhiko Ohe
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Decision makers' and scientists' opinion about contingent valuation and choice experiments for measuring willingness to pay in health care: results from a survey in Germany.

Authors:  Oliver H Günther; Hans-Helmut König
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.188

5.  Willingness to pay for hormone replacement therapy.

Authors:  N Zethraeus
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Validity of the five-item WHO Well-Being Index (WHO-5) in an elderly population.

Authors:  M Bonsignore; K Barkow; F Jessen; R Heun
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 7.  Clinical challenges of perimenopause: consensus opinion of The North American Menopause Society.

Authors: 
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Willingness to pay for antihypertensive care: evidence from a staff-model HMO.

Authors:  S D Ramsey; S D Sullivan; B M Psaty; D L Patrick
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Patients' willingness to pay for pharmacist-provided menopause and hormone replacement therapy consultations.

Authors:  Jamie C Barner; Andrea Branvold
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2005-03

Review 10.  Literature review of instruments to assess health-related quality of life during and after menopause.

Authors:  Y F Zöllner; C Acquadro; M Schaefer
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.147

View more
  3 in total

1.  Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year: a systematic review with meta-regression.

Authors:  Christian R C Kouakou; Thomas G Poder
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2021-08-21

2.  Willingness to pay for hospice care using the contingent valuation method.

Authors:  Mee-Ok Kim; Kun-Sei Lee; Jung-Hoe Kim; Ji-Soo Joo
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.759

3.  A Study of Patients' Willingness to Pay for a Basic Outpatient Copayment and Medical Service Quality in Taiwan.

Authors:  Wei Hsu; Chih-Hao Yang; Wen-Ping Fan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.