Literature DB >> 19711405

Preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cancer: comparison of gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MRI with MR cholangiopancreatography versus MDCT.

Hee Sun Park1, Jeong Min Lee, Hei Kyung Choi, Sung Hyun Hong, Joon Koo Han, Byung Ihn Choi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including dynamic imaging using three-dimensional gradient-echo (3D-GRE) sequences and MR cholangiopancreatograpy (MRCP) compared with that of multidetector row CT (MDCT) with regard to resectability in pancreas cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February 2004 to July 2008, 54 patients (32 men, 22 women: age range, 28-83 years; mean age, 63.1 years old) with surgically proven pancreatic carcinoma, who had undergone preoperative gadolinium-enhanced 3D-GRE MRI with MRCP and triple-phase MDCT, were included in this retrospective study. Two, clinically experienced attending radiologists independently reviewed the two image sets. These readers evaluated the tumor conspicuity, presence of vascular invasion, choledochal and duodenal invasion, lymph node metastases, distant metastasis, and tumor resectability. The results were compared with the surgical and histopathologic findings using receiver operating characteristic analysis (Az) and kappa statistics.
RESULTS: Curative resections were performed on 42 patients. Regarding the tumor conspicuity, MRI had a significantly higher Az value compared with MDCT according to both reviewers (P < 0.05). The accuracy of resectability was Az = 0.753 and 0.768 on MRI and Az = 0.829 and 0.762 on MDCT for each reviewer, and the difference in the accuracy of resectability was not significant between MRI and MDCT for either reviewer (P > 0.05). Two imaging sets showed a similar diagnostic performance in the evaluation of vascular involvement, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis.
CONCLUSION: Dynamic 3D-GRE MRI with MRCP shows superior tumor conspicuity and similar diagnostic performance compared with MDCT in evaluating the resectability of pancreatic cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19711405     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  32 in total

1.  One- and two-step self-expandable metal stent placement for distal malignant biliary obstruction: a propensity analysis.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Hamada; Yousuke Nakai; Hiroyuki Isayama; Osamu Togawa; Hirofumi Kogure; Kazumichi Kawakubo; Takeshi Tsujino; Naoki Sasahira; Kenji Hirano; Natsuyo Yamamoto; Yukiko Ito; Takashi Sasaki; Suguru Mizuno; Nobuo Toda; Minoru Tada; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 2.  Radiation risk from medical imaging.

Authors:  Eugene C Lin
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 3.  White paper on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from society of abdominal radiology's disease-focused panel for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Part II, update on imaging techniques and screening of pancreatic cancer in high-risk individuals.

Authors:  Naveen M Kulkarni; Lorenzo Mannelli; Marc Zins; Priya R Bhosale; Hina Arif-Tiwari; Olga R Brook; Elizabeth M Hecht; Fay Kastrinos; Zhen Jane Wang; Erik V Soloff; Parag P Tolat; Guillermo Sangster; Jason Fleming; Eric P Tamm; Avinash R Kambadakone
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-03

Review 4.  Diagnostic evaluation of solid pancreatic masses.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Tokar; Rohit Walia
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2013-10

Review 5.  Diagnostic accuracy of different imaging modalities following computed tomography (CT) scanning for assessing the resectability with curative intent in pancreatic and periampullary cancer.

Authors:  Domenico Tamburrino; Deniece Riviere; Mohammad Yaghoobi; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-09-15

6.  Differentiation of noncalculous periampullary obstruction: comparison of CT with negative-contrast CT cholangiopancreatography versus MRI with MR cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Bin Li; Lei Zhang; Zhui-Yang Zhang; Jian-Ming Ni; Feng-qi Lu; Wen-Juan Wu; Chun-juan Jiang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Pancreatic cancer: diagnosis and treatments.

Authors:  Hong-Yu Li; Zhong-Min Cui; Jiang Chen; Xiao-Zhong Guo; Ying-Yi Li
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-02-14

8.  Is tumour size an underestimated feature in the current TNM system for malignancies of the pancreatic head?

Authors:  David Petermann; Nicolas Demartines; Markus Schäfer
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 9.  The role of imaging in the clinical practice of radiation oncology for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Eugene J Koay; William Hall; Peter C Park; Beth Erickson; Joseph M Herman
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-02

Review 10.  Strategies for early detection of resectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Keiichi Okano; Yasuyuki Suzuki
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.