Literature DB >> 19711105

A comparative assessment of four methods for estimating ammonia emissions at microclimatic locations in a dairy building.

Frederick Kwame Teye1, Mikko Hautala.   

Abstract

Ammonia emissions were estimated at five microclimatic locations in a free stall dairy building using four different methods. Measurements were performed simultaneously with the different methods to enable comparison. In the first method, the rate of ammonia emission from manure was theoretically modeled utilizing Fick's law and boundary layer theory. In the second method, recirculation flux-chamber technique was used to model ammonia emission from manure. In the third and fourth methods, respectively, carbon dioxide and methane balances were employed to calculate ammonia emission. The mean ammonia emissions measured from the five locations using the different methods ranged from 0.10 to 0.15 g m(-2) h(-1). The percentage of variation of ammonia emission from the different location ranged between 8 and 52% for the different methods. Recorded ammonia emission rates in the dairy building were from 0.04 to 0.25 g m(-2) h(-1). The percentage of variation in ammonia, carbon dioxide, methane, and manure properties in the building was 50%. Two-way statistical analysis of variance showed that there were no significant differences (p > 0.63) between the four different methods or between the measurements obtained at the five locations (p > 0.90).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19711105     DOI: 10.1007/s00484-009-0255-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biometeorol        ISSN: 0020-7128            Impact factor:   3.787


  6 in total

Review 1.  The European perspective on nitrogen emission and deposition.

Authors:  Jan Willem Erisman; Peringe Grennfelt; Mark Sutton
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.621

2.  Air contaminants in different European farming environments.

Authors:  Katja Radon; Brigitta Danuser; Martin Iversen; Eduard Monso; Christoph Weber; Jörg Hartung; Kelley Donham; Urban Palmgren; Dennis Nowak
Journal:  Ann Agric Environ Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.447

Review 3.  Airborne reduced nitrogen: ammonia emissions from agriculture and other sources.

Authors:  Natalie Anderson; Ross Strader; Cliff Davidson
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.621

4.  Methane and carbon dioxide emissions from dairy cows in full lactation monitored over a six-month period.

Authors:  R Kinsman; F D Sauer; H A Jackson; M S Wolynetz
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Prediction of ammonia emission from dairy barns using feed characteristics part II: Relation between urinary urea concentration and ammonia emission.

Authors:  G J Monteny; M C J Smits; G van Duinkerken; H Mollenhorst; I J M de Boer
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  Methane emissions from cattle.

Authors:  K A Johnson; D E Johnson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.159

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.