BACKGROUND: Diets that provoke less insulin secretion may be helpful in the prevention and management of diabetes. A physiologic basis for ranking foods according to insulin "demand" could therefore assist further research. OBJECTIVE: We assessed the utility of a food insulin index (FII) that was based on testing isoenergetic portions of single foods (1000 kJ) in predicting the insulin demand evoked by composite meals. DESIGN: Healthy subjects (n = 10 or 11 for each meal) consumed 13 different isoenergetic (2000 kJ) mixed meals of varying macronutrient content. Insulin demand predicted by the FII of the component foods or by carbohydrate counting and glycemic load was compared with observed insulin responses. RESULTS: Observed insulin responses (area under the curve relative to white bread: 100) varied over a 3-fold range (from 35 +/- 5 to 116 +/- 26) and were strongly correlated with insulin demand predicted by the FII of the component foods (r = 0.78, P = 0.0016). The calculated glycemic load (r = 0.68, P = 0.01) but not the carbohydrate content of the meals (r = 0.53, P = 0.064) also predicted insulin demand. CONCLUSIONS: The relative insulin demand evoked by mixed meals is best predicted by a physiologic index based on actual insulin responses to isoenergetic portions of single foods. In the context of composite meals of similar energy value, but varying macronutrient content, carbohydrate counting was of limited value.
BACKGROUND: Diets that provoke less insulin secretion may be helpful in the prevention and management of diabetes. A physiologic basis for ranking foods according to insulin "demand" could therefore assist further research. OBJECTIVE: We assessed the utility of a food insulin index (FII) that was based on testing isoenergetic portions of single foods (1000 kJ) in predicting the insulin demand evoked by composite meals. DESIGN: Healthy subjects (n = 10 or 11 for each meal) consumed 13 different isoenergetic (2000 kJ) mixed meals of varying macronutrient content. Insulin demand predicted by the FII of the component foods or by carbohydrate counting and glycemic load was compared with observed insulin responses. RESULTS: Observed insulin responses (area under the curve relative to white bread: 100) varied over a 3-fold range (from 35 +/- 5 to 116 +/- 26) and were strongly correlated with insulin demand predicted by the FII of the component foods (r = 0.78, P = 0.0016). The calculated glycemic load (r = 0.68, P = 0.01) but not the carbohydrate content of the meals (r = 0.53, P = 0.064) also predicted insulin demand. CONCLUSIONS: The relative insulin demand evoked by mixed meals is best predicted by a physiologic index based on actual insulin responses to isoenergetic portions of single foods. In the context of composite meals of similar energy value, but varying macronutrient content, carbohydrate counting was of limited value.
Authors: Ying Bao; Katharina Nimptsch; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Andrew T Chan; Kimmie Ng; Dominique S Michaud; Jennie C Brand-Miller; Walter C Willett; Edward Giovannucci; Charles S Fuchs Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-10-05 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: NaNa Keum; Chen Yuan; Reiko Nishihara; Emilie Zoltick; Tsuyoshi Hamada; Alejandro Martinez Fernandez; Xuehong Zhang; Akiko Hanyuda; Li Liu; Keisuke Kosumi; Jonathan A Nowak; Iny Jhun; T Rinda Soong; Teppei Morikawa; Fred K Tabung; Zhi Rong Qian; Charles S Fuchs; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Andrew T Chan; Kimmie Ng; Shuji Ogino; Edward L Giovannucci; Kana Wu Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2017-03-28 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Jennifer Prescott; Ying Bao; Akila N Viswanathan; Edward L Giovannucci; Susan E Hankinson; Immaculata De Vivo Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-05-23 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Maryam S Farvid; A Heather Eliassen; Eunyoung Cho; Wendy Y Chen; Walter C Willett Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2015-03-24 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Katharina Nimptsch; Jennie C Brand-Miller; Mary Franz; Laura Sampson; Walter C Willett; Edward Giovannucci Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2011-05-04 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Derrick Johnston Alperet; Lesley M Butler; Woon-Puay Koh; Jian-Min Yuan; Rob M van Dam Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2017-02-08 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Ying Bao; Katharina Nimptsch; Brian M Wolpin; Dominique S Michaud; Jennie C Brand-Miller; Walter C Willett; Edward Giovannucci; Charles S Fuchs Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2011-07-20 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: K Nimptsch; S Kenfield; M K Jensen; M J Stampfer; M Franz; L Sampson; J C Brand-Miller; W C Willett; E Giovannucci Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2010-10-31 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Ali M Pohlmeier; Jennifer L Phy; Phillip Watkins; Mallory Boylan; Julian Spallholz; Kitty S Harris; Jamie A Cooper Journal: Appl Physiol Nutr Metab Date: 2014-08-11 Impact factor: 2.665