Literature DB >> 19708910

A comparison of the STORZ video laryngoscope and standard direct laryngoscopy for intubation in the Pediatric airway--a randomized clinical trial.

Arnim Vlatten1, Sylvie Aucoin, Sharon Litz, Brian Macmanus, Chris Soder.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Direct laryngoscopy can be challenging in infants and neonates. Even with an optimal line of sight to the glottic opening, the viewing angle has been measured at 15 degrees . The STORZ DCI video laryngoscope (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) incorporates a fiberoptic camera in the light source of a standard laryngoscope of variable sizes. The image is displayed on a screen with a viewing angle of 80 degrees . We studied the effectiveness of the STORZ DCI as an airway tool compared to standard direct laryngoscopy in children with normal airway.
METHODS: In this prospective, randomized study, 56 children (ages 4 years or younger) undergoing elective surgery with the need for endotracheal intubation were divided into two groups: children who underwent standard direct laryngoscopy using a Miller 1 or Macintosh 2 blade (DL) and children who underwent video laryngoscopy using the STORZ DCI video laryngoscope with a Miller 1 blade (VL). Time to best view (TTBV), time to intubate (TTI), Cormack-Lehane (CL), and percentage of glottis opening seen (POGO) score were recorded.
RESULTS: TTBV in DL was 5.5 (4-8) s and 7 (4.2-9) s in VL. TTI in DL was 21 (17-29) s and in VL 27 (22-37) s (P = 0.006). The view as assessed by POGO score was 97.5% (60-100%) in DL and 100% (100-100%) in the VL (P = 0.003). Data are presented as median and interquartile range and analyzed using t-test. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates that the STORZ DCI video laryngoscope provides an improved view to the glottis in children with normal airway anatomy, but requires a longer time for intubation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19708910     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2009.03127.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth        ISSN: 1155-5645            Impact factor:   2.556


  19 in total

Review 1.  [Video laryngoscopy olé! Time to say good bye to direct and flexible intubation?].

Authors:  S G Russo; M Weiss; C Eich
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Comparison of Airtraq optical laryngoscope and Storz video laryngoscope in a cadaver model.

Authors:  Michael C Wadman; Travis W Dierks; Chad E Branecki; Claudia L Barthold; Lance H Hoffman; Lina Lander; Carol S Lomneth; Richard A Walker
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2011

Review 3.  Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in children (excluding neonates).

Authors:  Ibtihal S Abdelgadir; Robert S Phillips; Davinder Singh; Michael P Moncreiff; Joanne L Lumsden
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-05-24

4.  Association Between Video Laryngoscopy and Adverse Tracheal Intubation-Associated Events in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Nicole R Pouppirt; Rula Nassar; Natalie Napolitano; Ursula Nawab; Akira Nishisaki; Vinay Nadkarni; Anne Ades; Elizabeth E Foglia
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  Comparison of LMA CTrach and Video Laryngoscope in Endotracheal Intubation.

Authors:  Nevzat Gümüş; Ahmet Dilek; Fatma Ülger; Ersin Köksal; Erhan Çetin Çetinoğlu; Fatih Özkan; Fuat Güldoğuş
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2014-07-09

6.  Comparison of direct and video laryngoscope endotracheal intubations by pediatric residents: A study of a child model with normal airway.

Authors:  Ayşe Berna Anil; Murat Anil; Fatih Durak; Ümüt Altuğ; Gökçen Özçifçi; Gülşen Yalçın; Şule Demir
Journal:  Turk Arch Pediatr       Date:  2021-05-01

Review 7.  Evolution of videolaryngoscopy in pediatric population.

Authors:  Anju Gupta; Ridhima Sharma; Nishkarsh Gupta
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-04-10

8.  Endotracheal intubation with airtraq® versus storz® videolaryngoscope in children younger than two years - a randomized pilot-study.

Authors:  Martin Kryspin Sørensen; Rolf Holm-Knudsen
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 9.  Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in neonates.

Authors:  Krithika Lingappan; Jennifer L Arnold; Caraciolo J Fernandes; Mohan Pammi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-06-04

10.  The difficult airway with recommendations for management--part 1--difficult tracheal intubation encountered in an unconscious/induced patient.

Authors:  J Adam Law; Natasha Broemling; Richard M Cooper; Pierre Drolet; Laura V Duggan; Donald E Griesdale; Orlando R Hung; Philip M Jones; George Kovacs; Simon Massey; Ian R Morris; Timothy Mullen; Michael F Murphy; Roanne Preston; Viren N Naik; Jeanette Scott; Shean Stacey; Timothy P Turkstra; David T Wong
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 5.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.