Literature DB >> 19708805

Caffeine's implications for women's health and survey of obstetrician-gynecologists' caffeine knowledge and assessment practices.

Britta L Anderson1, Laura M Juliano, Jay Schulkin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Caffeine has relevance for women's health and pregnancy, including significant associations with spontaneous abortion and low birth weight. According to scientific data, pregnant women and women of reproductive age should be advised to limit their caffeine consumption. This article reviews the implications of caffeine for women's psychological and physical health, and presents data on obstetrician-gynecologists' (ob-gyns) knowledge and practices pertaining to caffeine.
METHODS: Ob-gyns (N = 386) who are members of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network responded to a 21-item survey about caffeine.
RESULTS: Although most knew that caffeine is passed through breast milk, only 24.8% were aware that caffeine metabolism significantly slows as pregnancy progresses. Many respondents were not aware of the caffeine content of commonly used products, such as espresso and Diet Coke, with 14.3% and 57.8% indicating amounts within an accurate range, respectively. Furthermore, ob-gyns did not take into account large differences in caffeine content across different caffeinated beverages with most recommending one to two servings of coffee or tea or soft drinks per day. There was substantial inconsistency in what was considered to be "high levels" of maternal caffeine consumption, with only 31.6% providing a response. When asked to indicate the risk that high levels of caffeine have on various pregnancy outcomes, responses were not consistent with scientific data. For example, respondents overestimated the relative risk of stillbirths and underestimated the relative risk of spontaneous abortion. There was great variability in assessment and advice practices pertaining to caffeine. More than half advise their pregnant patients to consume caffeine under certain circumstances, most commonly to alleviate headache and caffeine withdrawal.
CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that ob-gyns could benefit from information about caffeine and its relevance to their clinical practice. The development of clinical practice guidelines for caffeine may prove to be useful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19708805     DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2008.1186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  9 in total

1.  Caffeine Withdrawal and Dependence: A Convenience Survey Among Addiction Professionals.

Authors:  Alan J Budney; Pamela C Brown; Roland R Griffiths; John R Hughes; Laura M Juliano
Journal:  J Caffeine Res       Date:  2013-06

2.  Characterization of individuals seeking treatment for caffeine dependence.

Authors:  Laura M Juliano; Daniel P Evatt; Brian D Richards; Roland R Griffiths
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2012-02-27

3.  Caffeine intake, and the risk of stress, urgency and mixed urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Ying H Jura; Mary K Townsend; Gary C Curhan; Neil M Resnick; Francine Grodstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Caffeinated beverage intake and reproductive hormones among premenopausal women in the BioCycle Study.

Authors:  Karen C Schliep; Enrique F Schisterman; Sunni L Mumford; Anna Z Pollack; Cuilin Zhang; Aijun Ye; Joseph B Stanford; Ahmad O Hammoud; Christina A Porucznik; Jean Wactawski-Wende
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 5.  Health effects of energy drinks on children, adolescents, and young adults.

Authors:  Sara M Seifert; Judith L Schaechter; Eugene R Hershorin; Steven E Lipshultz
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 6.  Evaluating the Validity of Caffeine Use Disorder.

Authors:  Alan J Budney; Dustin C Lee; Laura M Juliano
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.285

7.  A brief manualized treatment for problematic caffeine use: A randomized control trial.

Authors:  Daniel P Evatt; Laura M Juliano; Roland R Griffiths
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2015-10-26

8.  Quantitative Proteomic Analysis Reveals Caffeine-Perturbed Proteomic Profiles in Normal Bladder Epithelial Cells.

Authors:  Muhammad Shahid; Minhyung Kim; Austin Yeon; Allen M Andres; Sungyong You; Jayoung Kim
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 5.393

9.  Adherence to the Caffeine Intake Guideline during Pregnancy and Birth Outcomes: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Amy Peacock; Delyse Hutchinson; Judy Wilson; Clare McCormack; Raimondo Bruno; Craig A Olsson; Steve Allsop; Elizabeth Elliott; Lucinda Burns; Richard P Mattick
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 5.717

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.