Literature DB >> 19707606

Predicting the need for supplemental oxygen during airline flight in patients with chronic pulmonary disease: a comparison of predictive equations and altitude simulation.

Ana C Bradi1, Marie E Faughnan, Matthew B Stanbrook, Eva Deschenes-Leek, Kenneth R Chapman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic pulmonary diseases are at increased risk of hypoxemia when travelling by air. Screening guidelines, predictive equations based on ground level measurements and altitude simulation laboratory procedures have been recommended for determining risk but have not been rigorously evaluated and compared.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the adequacy of screening recommendations that identify patients at risk of hypoxemia at altitude, to evaluate the specificity and sensitivity of published predictive equations, and to analyze other possible predictors of the need for in-flight oxygen.
METHODS: The charts of 27 consecutive eligible patients referred for hypoxia altitude simulation testing before flight were reviewed. Patients breathed a fraction of inspired oxygen of 0.15 for 20 min. This patient population was compared with the screening recommendations made by six official bodies and compared the partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO(2)) obtained during altitude simulation with the PaO(2) predicted by 16 published predictive equations.
RESULTS: Of the 27 subjects, 25% to 33% who were predicted to maintain adequate oxygenation in flight by the British Thoracic Society, Aerospace Medical Association or American Thoracic Society guidelines became hypoxemic during altitude simulation. The 16 predictive equations were markedly inaccurate in predicting the PaO(2) measured during altitude simulation; only one had a positive predictive value of greater than 30%. Regression analysis identified PaO(2) at ground level (r=0.50; P=0.009), diffusion capacity (r=0.56; P=0.05) and per cent forced expiratory volume in 1 s (r=0.57; P=0.009) as having predictive value for hypoxia at altitude.
CONCLUSIONS: Current screening recommendations for determining which patients require formal assessment of oxygen during flight are inadequate. Predictive equations based on sea level variables provide poor estimates of PaO(2) measured during altitude simulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19707606      PMCID: PMC2734438          DOI: 10.1155/2009/371901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Respir J        ISSN: 1198-2241            Impact factor:   2.409


  23 in total

Review 1.  Advising patients with pulmonary diseases on air travel.

Authors:  H Gong
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-09-01       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Hypoxaemia in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients during a commercial flight.

Authors:  A Akerø; C C Christensen; A Edvardsen; O H Skjønsberg
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 16.671

3.  Normobaric hypoxia inhalation test vs. response to airline flight in healthy passengers.

Authors:  Paul T Kelly; Maureen P Swanney; Chris Frampton; Leigh M Seccombe; Matthew J Peters; Lutz E Beckert
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  2006-11

4.  Effect of simulated commercial flight on oxygenation in patients with interstitial lung disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  L M Seccombe; P T Kelly; C K Wong; P G Rogers; S Lim; M J Peters
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 9.139

5.  Recommendations for patients with chronic respiratory disease considering air travel: a statement from the Canadian Thoracic Society.

Authors:  D Lien; M Turner
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.409

6.  Is normobaric simulation of hypobaric hypoxia accurate in chronic airflow limitation?

Authors:  M T Naughton; P D Rochford; J J Pretto; R J Pierce; N F Cain; L B Irving
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 21.405

7.  Hypoxemia during altitude exposure. A meta-analysis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  T A Dillard; A P Rosenberg; B W Berg
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Hypoxia-altitude simulation test. Evaluation of patients with chronic airway obstruction.

Authors:  H Gong; D P Tashkin; E Y Lee; M S Simmons
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1984-12

9.  The preflight evaluation. A comparison of the hypoxia inhalation test with hypobaric exposure.

Authors:  T A Dillard; L K Moores; K L Bilello; Y Y Phillips
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Hypoxemia during air travel in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  T A Dillard; B W Berg; K R Rajagopal; J W Dooley; W J Mehm
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-09-01       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Navigating air travel and cardiovascular concerns: Is the sky the limit?

Authors:  Muhammad Hammadah; Bryan R Kindya; Marc P Allard-Ratick; Sammer Jazbeh; Danny Eapen; W H Wilson Tang; Laurence Sperling
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  Cardiorespiratory Adaptation to Short-Term Exposure to Altitude vs. Normobaric Hypoxia in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension.

Authors:  Simon R Schneider; Mona Lichtblau; Michael Furian; Laura C Mayer; Charlotte Berlier; Julian Müller; Stéphanie Saxer; Esther I Schwarz; Konrad E Bloch; Silvia Ulrich
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  BTS Clinical Statement on air travel for passengers with respiratory disease.

Authors:  Robina Kate Coker; Alison Armstrong; Alistair Colin Church; Steve Holmes; Jonathan Naylor; Katharine Pike; Peter Saunders; Kristofer John Spurling; Pamela Vaughn
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  Assessing Patients for Air Travel.

Authors:  Amy L Bellinghausen; Jess Mandel
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 9.410

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.