Literature DB >> 17086767

Normobaric hypoxia inhalation test vs. response to airline flight in healthy passengers.

Paul T Kelly1, Maureen P Swanney, Chris Frampton, Leigh M Seccombe, Matthew J Peters, Lutz E Beckert.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There is little data available to determine the normal response to normobaric hypoxia inhalation testing (NHIT) and air travel. Quantifying a healthy response may assist in the evaluation of passengers considered at risk for air travel. The aims of this study were: (1) to quantify the degree of desaturation in healthy subjects during a NHIT and air travel; and (2) assess the validity of the NHIT when compared with actual in-flight responses.
METHODS: There were 15 healthy adults (age 23-57; 10 women) who volunteered for this study. Preflight tests included lung function, arterial blood gas, pulse oximetry (SpO2), and NHIT (inspired oxygen 15%). SpO2 and cabin pressure were measured continuously on each subject during a commercial air flight (mean cabin altitude 2178 m; range 1719-2426 m). In-flight oxygenation was compared with the preflight NHIT.
RESULTS: Lung function testing results were normal. There was significant desaturation (SpO2) during the NHIT (pre: 98 +/- 2%; post: 92 +/- 2%) and at cruising altitude (pre: 97 +/- 1%; cruise: 92 +/- 2%). There was no difference between the final NHIT SpO2 and the mean in-flight SpO2. There was a significant difference between the lowest in-flight SpO2 (88 +/- 2%) vs. the lowest NHIT SpO2, (90 +/- 2%). DISCUSSION: Oxygen saturation decreases significantly during air travel in normal individuals. In this group of healthy passengers the NHIT approximates some, but not all, aspects of in-flight oxygenation. These results can be used to describe a normal response to the NHIT and air-travel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17086767

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med        ISSN: 0095-6562


  3 in total

1.  Predicting the need for supplemental oxygen during airline flight in patients with chronic pulmonary disease: a comparison of predictive equations and altitude simulation.

Authors:  Ana C Bradi; Marie E Faughnan; Matthew B Stanbrook; Eva Deschenes-Leek; Kenneth R Chapman
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.409

2.  Digital Health: Tracking Physiomes and Activity Using Wearable Biosensors Reveals Useful Health-Related Information.

Authors:  Xiao Li; Jessilyn Dunn; Denis Salins; Gao Zhou; Wenyu Zhou; Sophia Miryam Schüssler-Fiorenza Rose; Dalia Perelman; Elizabeth Colbert; Ryan Runge; Shannon Rego; Ria Sonecha; Somalee Datta; Tracey McLaughlin; Michael P Snyder
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 8.029

3.  Assessing Patients for Air Travel.

Authors:  Amy L Bellinghausen; Jess Mandel
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 9.410

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.