Literature DB >> 19707152

Communication, encouragement, and cancer screening in families with and without mutations for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: a pilot study.

Anne L Ersig1, Janet K Williams, Donald W Hadley, Laura M Koehly.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Known and suspected mutation carriers for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer are advised to have colonoscopies every 1 to 2 years to detect colorectal cancer. Little is known about colonoscopy completion in families suspected of having hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer but without identified mutations.
METHODS: This study examined the effect of communication and encouragement on colonoscopy in families with and without known mutations. Twenty-three respondents from 11 families with indeterminate genetic test results were matched with 23 respondents from 11 families with mutation-positive results. Hierarchical modeling examined the effects of relational characteristics on time since last colonoscopy in index cases and their first-degree relatives.
RESULTS: Nearly one fifth of respondents were not screening appropriately. Time since last screening did not differ according to family mutation status. However, respondents who communicated about risk and received encouragement to screen from a greater proportion of named family members, and those who had a greater proportion of named family members involved in both communication and encouragement were significantly more likely to have a shorter time interval since last colonoscopy.
CONCLUSION: Identifying patterns of interaction within at-risk families, regardless of gene mutation status, may be one avenue for promoting screening adherence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19707152      PMCID: PMC2917812          DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181b3f42d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  30 in total

Review 1.  From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium.

Authors:  L F Berkman; T Glass; I Brissette; T E Seeman
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Relatives of colorectal cancer patients: factors associated with screening behavior.

Authors:  Lisa Madlensky; Mary Jane Esplen; Steven Gallinger; John R McLaughlin; Vivek Goel
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Progress in genetic testing, classification, and identification of Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Hans F A Vasen; C Richard Boland
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Screening participation in individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer: a review.

Authors:  G Rees; P R Martin; F A Macrae
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.520

5.  Controlled 15-year trial on screening for colorectal cancer in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  H J Järvinen; M Aarnio; H Mustonen; K Aktan-Collan; L A Aaltonen; P Peltomäki; A De La Chapelle; J P Mecklin
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 6.  Recommendations for the care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to Lynch syndrome: a systematic review.

Authors:  Noralane M Lindor; Gloria M Petersen; Donald W Hadley; Anita Y Kinney; Susan Miesfeldt; Karen H Lu; Patrick Lynch; Wylie Burke; Nancy Press
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Psychosocial aspects of genetic counseling and testing.

Authors:  Susan Thomas Vadaparampil; Jennifer Permuth Wey; Anita Yeomans Kinney
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.315

8.  Monitoring coping style moderates emotional reactions to genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  S Shiloh; L Koehly; J Jenkins; J Martin; D Hadley
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: genetic testing strategies in newly diagnosed individuals with colorectal cancer aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality from Lynch syndrome in relatives.

Authors: 
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 10.  A systematic review of perceived risks, psychological and behavioral impacts of genetic testing.

Authors:  Jodi T Heshka; Crystal Palleschi; Heather Howley; Brenda Wilson; Philip S Wells
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  32 in total

1.  Understanding patterns of health communication in families at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: examining the effect of conclusive versus indeterminate genetic test results.

Authors:  Anne L Ersig; Donald W Hadley; Laura M Koehly
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2011-06-24

Review 2.  Specific psychosocial issues of individuals undergoing genetic counseling for cancer - a literature review.

Authors:  Willem Eijzenga; Daniela E E Hahn; Neil K Aaronson; Irma Kluijt; Eveline M A Bleiker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Screening adherence and cancer risk perceptions in colorectal cancer survivors with Lynch-like syndrome.

Authors:  L H Katz; A M Burton-Chase; S Advani; B Fellman; K M Polivka; Y Yuan; P M Lynch; S K Peterson
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 4.438

4.  Legacies and Relationships: Diverse Social Networks and BRCA1/2 Risk Management Decisions and Actions.

Authors:  Anne L Ersig; Allison Werner-Lin; Lindsey Hoskins; Jennifer Young; Jennifer T Loud; June Peters; Mark H Greene
Journal:  J Fam Nurs       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 3.818

5.  The importance of older family members in providing social resources and promoting cancer screening in families with a hereditary cancer syndrome.

Authors:  Sato Ashida; Donald W Hadley; Andrea F Goergen; Kaley F Skapinsky; Hillary C Devlin; Laura M Koehly
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2011-05-11

6.  Social network members who engage in activities with older adults: Do they bring more social benefits than other members?

Authors:  Sato Ashida; Daniel K Sewell; Ellen J Schafer; Audrey Schroer; Julia Friberg
Journal:  Ageing Soc       Date:  2018-01-08

7.  It's Interpersonal: Family Relationships, Genetic Risk, and Caregiving.

Authors:  Laura M Koehly
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2016-08-09

Review 8.  100 years Lynch syndrome: what have we learned about psychosocial issues?

Authors:  Eveline M A Bleiker; Mary Jane Esplen; Bettina Meiser; Helle Vendel Petersen; Andrea Farkas Patenaude
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Family Ties: The Role of Family Context in Family Health History Communication About Cancer.

Authors:  Vivian M Rodríguez; Rosalie Corona; Joann N Bodurtha; John M Quillin
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2016-01-06

10.  Predictors of parent-child relationships that support physical activity in Mexican-American families.

Authors:  Kayla de la Haye; Hendrik Dirk de Heer; Anna V Wilkinson; Laura M Koehly
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2012-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.