PURPOSE: This study tested the hypothesis that the type of dose fractionation regimen determines the ability of radiotherapy to synergize with anti-CTLA-4 antibody. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: TSA mouse breast carcinoma cells were injected s.c. into syngeneic mice at two separate sites, defined as a "primary" site that was irradiated and a "secondary" site outside the radiotherapy field. When both tumors were palpable, mice were randomly assigned to eight groups receiving no radiotherapy or three distinct regimens of radiotherapy (20 Gy x 1, 8 Gy x 3, or 6 Gy x 5 fractions in consecutive days) in combination or not with 9H10 monoclonal antibody against CTLA-4. Mice were followed for tumor growth/regression. Similar experiments were conducted in the MCA38 mouse colon carcinoma model. RESULTS: In either of the two models tested, treatment with 9H10 alone had no detectable effect. Each of the radiotherapy regimens caused comparable growth delay of the primary tumors but had no effect on the secondary tumors outside the radiation field. Conversely, the combination of 9H10 and either fractionated radiotherapy regimens achieved enhanced tumor response at the primary site (P < 0.0001). Moreover, an abscopal effect, defined as a significant growth inhibition of the tumor outside the field, occurred only in mice treated with the combination of 9H10 and fractionated radiotherapy (P < 0.01). The frequency of CD8+ T cells showing tumor-specific IFN-gamma production was proportional to the inhibition of the secondary tumor. CONCLUSIONS: Fractionated but not single-dose radiotherapy induces an abscopal effect when in combination with anti-CTLA-4 antibody in two preclinical carcinoma models.
PURPOSE: This study tested the hypothesis that the type of dose fractionation regimen determines the ability of radiotherapy to synergize with anti-CTLA-4 antibody. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:TSAmousebreast carcinoma cells were injected s.c. into syngeneic mice at two separate sites, defined as a "primary" site that was irradiated and a "secondary" site outside the radiotherapy field. When both tumors were palpable, mice were randomly assigned to eight groups receiving no radiotherapy or three distinct regimens of radiotherapy (20 Gy x 1, 8 Gy x 3, or 6 Gy x 5 fractions in consecutive days) in combination or not with 9H10 monoclonal antibody against CTLA-4. Mice were followed for tumor growth/regression. Similar experiments were conducted in the MCA38 mousecolon carcinoma model. RESULTS: In either of the two models tested, treatment with 9H10 alone had no detectable effect. Each of the radiotherapy regimens caused comparable growth delay of the primary tumors but had no effect on the secondary tumors outside the radiation field. Conversely, the combination of 9H10 and either fractionated radiotherapy regimens achieved enhanced tumor response at the primary site (P < 0.0001). Moreover, an abscopal effect, defined as a significant growth inhibition of the tumor outside the field, occurred only in mice treated with the combination of 9H10 and fractionated radiotherapy (P < 0.01). The frequency of CD8+ T cells showing tumor-specific IFN-gamma production was proportional to the inhibition of the secondary tumor. CONCLUSIONS: Fractionated but not single-dose radiotherapy induces an abscopal effect when in combination with anti-CTLA-4 antibody in two preclinical carcinoma models.
Authors: Mong-Hsun Tsai; John A Cook; Gadisetti V R Chandramouli; William DeGraff; Hailing Yan; Shuping Zhao; C Norman Coleman; James B Mitchell; Eric Y Chuang Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2007-04-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: K Ohba; K Omagari; T Nakamura; N Ikuno; S Saeki; I Matsuo; H Kinoshita; J Masuda; H Hazama; I Sakamoto; S Kohno Journal: Gut Date: 1998-10 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: James L Gulley; Philip M Arlen; Anne Bastian; Steven Morin; Jennifer Marte; Patricia Beetham; Kwong-Yok Tsang; Junko Yokokawa; James W Hodge; Cynthia Ménard; Kevin Camphausen; C Norman Coleman; Francis Sullivan; Seth M Steinberg; Jeffrey Schlom; William Dahut Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-05-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Amit A Lugade; James P Moran; Scott A Gerber; Robert C Rose; John G Frelinger; Edith M Lord Journal: J Immunol Date: 2005-06-15 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Sandra Demaria; Noriko Kawashima; Anne Marie Yang; Mary Louise Devitt; James S Babb; James P Allison; Silvia C Formenti Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-01-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Steven A Rosenberg; Richard M Sherry; Kathleen E Morton; William J Scharfman; James C Yang; Suzanne L Topalian; Richard E Royal; Udai Kammula; Nicholas P Restifo; Marybeth S Hughes; Douglas Schwartzentruber; David M Berman; Susan L Schwarz; Lien T Ngo; Sharon A Mavroukakis; Donald E White; Seth M Steinberg Journal: J Immunol Date: 2005-11-01 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Tobin Strom; Louis B Harrison; Anna R Giuliano; Michael J Schell; Steven A Eschrich; Anders Berglund; William Fulp; Ram Thapa; Domenico Coppola; Sungjune Kim; Jessica Frakes; John Foekens; James J Mulé; Javier F Torres-Roca Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Megan Morisada; Paul E Clavijo; Ellen Moore; Lillian Sun; Michael Chamberlin; Carter Van Waes; James W Hodge; James B Mitchell; Jay Friedman; Clint T Allen Journal: Oncoimmunology Date: 2017-11-27 Impact factor: 8.110
Authors: Derek Ng Tang; Yu Shen; Jingjing Sun; Sijin Wen; Jedd D Wolchok; Jianda Yuan; James P Allison; Padmanee Sharma Journal: Cancer Immunol Res Date: 2013-07-31 Impact factor: 11.151
Authors: Christopher A Barker; Michael A Postow; Shaheer A Khan; Kathryn Beal; Preeti K Parhar; Yoshiya Yamada; Nancy Y Lee; Jedd D Wolchok Journal: Cancer Immunol Res Date: 2013-07-25 Impact factor: 11.151
Authors: Susan M Hiniker; Daniel S Chen; Sunil Reddy; Daniel T Chang; Jennifer C Jones; Joseph A Mollick; Susan M Swetter; Susan J Knox Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2012-12-01 Impact factor: 4.243
Authors: E Liniker; A M Menzies; B Y Kong; A Cooper; S Ramanujam; S Lo; R F Kefford; G B Fogarty; A Guminski; T W Wang; M S Carlino; A Hong; G V Long Journal: Oncoimmunology Date: 2016-08-19 Impact factor: 8.110