Literature DB >> 19705187

Chromosomal anomalies influence parental treatment decisions in relation to prenatally diagnosed congenital heart disease.

Sinai C Zyblewski1, Elizabeth G Hill, Girish Shirali, Andrew Atz, Geoffrey Forbus, Javier Gonzalez, Anthony Hlavacek.   

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the variables that influence parental treatment decisions after a prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease (CHD). The authors reviewed all cases of prenatally diagnosed structural CHD from August 1998 to December 2006 at their center. The following variables were studied as potential predictors of parental intent to treat: maternal age, race, insurance status, obstetric history, fetal gender, univentricular versus biventricular cardiac physiology, and fetal chromosomal abnormality. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. In the review, 252 consecutive cases of prenatally diagnosed CHD were identified. Of these, 204 women pursued full medical treatment, whereas 25 women sought termination of pregnancy or comfort care. Parental intent to treat was unknown for 23 cases. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified fetal chromosomal abnormality as the only variable that influenced parental intent to treat (odds ratio [OR], 14.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.28-62.66; p = 0.0006). An associated chromosomal abnormality rather than the severity of the heart defect influences the decision to choose termination of pregnancy or comfort care for a fetus with prenatally diagnosed CHD. Women were 14 times more likely to terminate a pregnancy or seek comfort care for a fetus with CHD if a chromosomal abnormality was present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19705187      PMCID: PMC4356125          DOI: 10.1007/s00246-009-9514-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol        ISSN: 0172-0643            Impact factor:   1.655


  18 in total

1.  Prenatal diagnosis of conotruncal malformations: diagnostic accuracy, outcome, chromosomal abnormalities, and extracardiac anomalies.

Authors:  Shanthi Sivanandam; Julie S Glickstein; Beth F Printz; Lindsey D Allan; Karen Altmann; David E Solowiejczyk; Lynn Simpson; Annette Perez-Delboy; Charles S Kleinman
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Outcome following, and impact of, prenatal identification of the candidates for the Norwood procedure.

Authors:  Robin R Fountain-Dommer; Scott M Bradley; Andrew M Atz; Martha R Stroud; Geoffrey A Forbus; Girish S Shirali
Journal:  Cardiol Young       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.093

Review 3.  Counselling following a diagnosis of congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Lindsey D Allan; Ian C Huggon
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2004-12-30       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 4.  The influence of prenatal diagnosis on postnatal outcome in patients with structural congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Robert S Yates
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2004-12-30       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  Improved surgical outcome after fetal diagnosis of hypoplastic left heart syndrome.

Authors:  W Tworetzky; D B McElhinney; V M Reddy; M M Brook; F L Hanley; N H Silverman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-03-06       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Comparison of outcome when hypoplastic left heart syndrome and transposition of the great arteries are diagnosed prenatally versus when diagnosis of these two conditions is made only postnatally.

Authors:  R K Kumar; J W Newburger; K Gauvreau; S A Kamenir; L K Hornberger
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Outcome of prenatally diagnosed congenital heart disease: an update.

Authors:  D H Brick; L D Allan
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.655

8.  Prospective diagnosis of 1,006 consecutive cases of congenital heart disease in the fetus.

Authors:  L D Allan; G K Sharland; A Milburn; S M Lockhart; A M Groves; R H Anderson; A C Cook; N L Fagg
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease and fetal karyotyping.

Authors:  D Paladini; R Calabrò; S Palmieri; T D'Andrea
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Spectrum of cardiovascular disease, accuracy of diagnosis, and outcome in fetal heterotaxy syndrome.

Authors:  Mio Taketazu; Jane Lougheed; Shi-Joon Yoo; Joyce S L Lim; Lisa K Hornberger
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2006-01-11       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Prenatal Counseling of Fetal Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Caroline K Lee
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-01

2.  Variables influencing pregnancy termination following prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosome abnormalities.

Authors:  Anne Hawkins; Ana Stenzel; Joanne Taylor; Valerie Y Chock; Louanne Hudgins
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Parental decision-making for medically complex infants and children: an integrated literature review.

Authors:  Kimberly A Allen
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 5.837

Review 4.  Imaging of patients with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Arno A W Roest; Albert de Roos
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 32.419

5.  Prenatal diagnosis and risk factors for preoperative death in neonates with single right ventricle and systemic outflow obstruction: screening data from the Pediatric Heart Network Single Ventricle Reconstruction Trial(∗).

Authors:  Andrew M Atz; Thomas G Travison; Ismee A Williams; Gail D Pearson; Peter C Laussen; William T Mahle; Amanda L Cook; Joel A Kirsh; Mark Sklansky; Svetlana Khaikin; Caren Goldberg; Michele Frommelt; Catherine Krawczeski; Michael D Puchalski; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Jeanne M Baffa; Jack Rychik; Richard G Ohye
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Copy Number Variants of Undetermined Significance Are Not Associated with Worse Clinical Outcomes in Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome.

Authors:  Andrew L Dailey-Schwartz; Hanna J Tadros; Mahshid Sababi Azamian; Seema R Lalani; Shaine A Morris; Hugh D Allen; Jeffrey J Kim; Andrew P Landstrom
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 4.406

7.  Current Practice and Utility of Chromosome Microarray Analysis in Infants Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Jason R Buckley; Minoo N Kavarana; Shahryar M Chowdhury; Mark A Scheurer
Journal:  Congenit Heart Dis       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 2.007

8.  Variation in Prenatal Diagnosis of Congenital Heart Disease in Infants.

Authors:  Michael D Quartermain; Sara K Pasquali; Kevin D Hill; David J Goldberg; James C Huhta; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Marshall L Jacobs; Sunghee Kim; Ross M Ungerleider
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Socioeconomic inequalities in outcome of pregnancy and neonatal mortality associated with congenital anomalies: population based study.

Authors:  Lucy K Smith; Judith L S Budd; David J Field; Elizabeth S Draper
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-07-19

10.  Diagnosis of a severe congenital anomaly: A qualitative analysis of parental decision making and the implications for healthcare encounters.

Authors:  Robyn Lotto; Lucy K Smith; Natalie Armstrong
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.