PURPOSE: To present the Gaussian Histogram Normalized Correlation (GHNC) system, to quantify the extent of disease on computed tomography (CT) images of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and to assess its utility by comparing the radiologist' scoring and prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: GHNC was used to analyze baseline thin-section CT images (30-60images per patients) of 40 patients with IPF. It classified the CT lung field into normal (N), ground-glass opacities (G), consolidation (C), emphysema (E) and fibrosis (F) patterns [the latter was also subdivided into reticular (F1) and honeycomb (F2) patterns], then the relative lung volume and relative each pattern volume (area multiplied by slice thickness and interval and divided by predicted total lung capacity) were estimated. The radiologists estimated the area of these patterns on 4 slices per patient; the average was regarded as total extent of each pattern. We compared the estimates determined by radiologists and GHNC with pulmonary function tests, and used Cox regression analysis to examine the relationships between the volumes and patient survival. RESULTS: The area of each pattern measured by GHNC correlated significantly with that estimated by the radiologist on 160 images (P<0.001, each). The volumes of N-pattern and F-patterns are measured by GHNC correlated with carbon monoxide diffusing capacity.During the follow-up (mean 49 mo), 24 patients died. Relative lung volume, N-pattern, F-pattern and F2-pattern correlated with survival in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis identified F2-pattern volume by GHNC (P=0.034) as a significant predictor of survival. CONCLUSIONS: The GHNC provides automatic measurement of volume of fibrosis. The F2-pattern on CT can predict prognosis of patients with IPF.
PURPOSE: To present the Gaussian Histogram Normalized Correlation (GHNC) system, to quantify the extent of disease on computed tomography (CT) images of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and to assess its utility by comparing the radiologist' scoring and prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: GHNC was used to analyze baseline thin-section CT images (30-60images per patients) of 40 patients with IPF. It classified the CT lung field into normal (N), ground-glass opacities (G), consolidation (C), emphysema (E) and fibrosis (F) patterns [the latter was also subdivided into reticular (F1) and honeycomb (F2) patterns], then the relative lung volume and relative each pattern volume (area multiplied by slice thickness and interval and divided by predicted total lung capacity) were estimated. The radiologists estimated the area of these patterns on 4 slices per patient; the average was regarded as total extent of each pattern. We compared the estimates determined by radiologists and GHNC with pulmonary function tests, and used Cox regression analysis to examine the relationships between the volumes and patient survival. RESULTS: The area of each pattern measured by GHNC correlated significantly with that estimated by the radiologist on 160 images (P<0.001, each). The volumes of N-pattern and F-patterns are measured by GHNC correlated with carbon monoxide diffusing capacity.During the follow-up (mean 49 mo), 24 patients died. Relative lung volume, N-pattern, F-pattern and F2-pattern correlated with survival in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis identified F2-pattern volume by GHNC (P=0.034) as a significant predictor of survival. CONCLUSIONS: The GHNC provides automatic measurement of volume of fibrosis. The F2-pattern on CT can predict prognosis of patients with IPF.
Authors: N Sakai; H Yabuuchi; M Kondo; Y Matsuo; T Kamitani; M Nagao; M Jinnouchi; M Yonezawa; T Kojima; Y Yano; H Honda Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2015-07-08 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Samuel Y Ash; Rola Harmouche; Rachel K Putman; James C Ross; Alejandro A Diaz; Gary M Hunninghake; Jorge Onieva Onieva; Fernando J Martinez; Augustine M Choi; David A Lynch; Hiroto Hatabu; Ivan O Rosas; Raul San Jose Estepar; George R Washko Journal: Chest Date: 2017-05-12 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Samuel Y Ash; Rola Harmouche; James C Ross; Alejandro A Diaz; Gary M Hunninghake; Rachel K Putman; Jorge Onieva; Fernando J Martinez; Augustine M Choi; David A Lynch; Hiroto Hatabu; Ivan O Rosas; Raul San Jose Estepar; George R Washko Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2016-12-15 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Hyun J Kim; Matthew S Brown; Robert Elashoff; Gang Li; David W Gjertson; David A Lynch; Diane C Strollo; Eric Kleerup; Daniel Chong; Sumit K Shah; Shama Ahmad; Fereidoun Abtin; Donald P Tashkin; Jonathan G Goldin Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-09-17 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Grace Hyun J Kim; Donald P Tashkin; Pechin Lo; Matthew S Brown; Elizabeth R Volkmann; David W Gjertson; Dinesh Khanna; Robert M Elashoff; Chi-Hong Tseng; Michael D Roth; Jonathan G Goldin Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2019-12-26 Impact factor: 10.995
Authors: Stephen M Humphries; Kunihiro Yagihashi; Jason Huckleberry; Byung-Hak Rho; Joyce D Schroeder; Matthew Strand; Marvin I Schwarz; Kevin R Flaherty; Ella A Kazerooni; Edwin J R van Beek; David A Lynch Journal: Radiology Date: 2017-05-10 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Grace Hyun J Kim; Stephan S Weigt; John A Belperio; Matthew S Brown; Yu Shi; Joshua H Lai; Jonathan G Goldin Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-08-26 Impact factor: 5.315