| Literature DB >> 19703311 |
Kanako Ishihara1, Toshio Takahashi, Ayako Morioka, Akemi Kojima, Mayumi Kijima, Tetsuo Asai, Yutaka Tamura.
Abstract
A total of 518 fecal samples collected from 183 apparently healthy cattle, 180 pigs and 155 broilers throughout Japan in 1999 were examined to determine the prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella. The isolation rates were 36.1% in broilers, 2.8% in pigs and 0.5% in cattle. S. enterica Infantis was the most frequent isolate, found in 22.6% of broiler fecal samples. Higher resistance rates were observed against oxytetracycline (82.0%), dihydrostreptomycin (77.9%), kanamycin (41.0%) and trimethoprim (35.2%). Resistance rates to ampicillin, ceftiofur, bicozamycin, chloramphenicol and nalidixic acid were <10%. CTX-M-2 beta-lactamase producing S. enterica Senftenberg was found in the isolates obtained from one broiler fecal sample. This is the first report of cephalosporin-resistant Salmonella directly isolated from food animal in Japan.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19703311 PMCID: PMC2743694 DOI: 10.1186/1751-0147-51-35
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Vet Scand ISSN: 0044-605X Impact factor: 1.695
Salmonella serotype distributions by animal origin
| Origin of the samples | Serotype | No. of | |||||
| (No. of samples) | FE a | DSEC b | total | ||||
| Broilers (n = 155) | Infantis | 19 | (12.3) | 16† | (10.3) | 35 | (22.6)† |
| Hadar | 4 | (2.6) | 0 | (0) | 4 | (2.6) | |
| Haifa | 1 | (0.6) | 1 | (0.6) | 2 | (1.3) | |
| Montevideo | 2 | (1.3) | 0 | (0) | 2 | (1.3) | |
| Schwarzengrund | 2 | (1.3) | 0 | (0) | 2 | (1.3) | |
| Thompson | 2 | (1.3) | 0 | (0) | 2 | (1.3) | |
| Augustenborg | 1 | (0.6) | 0 | (0) | 1 | (0.6) | |
| Blockley | 0 | (0) | 1 | (0.6) | 1 | (0.6) | |
| Istanbul | 0 | (0) | 1 | (0.6) | 1 | (0.6) | |
| Newport | 1† | (0.6) | 0 | (0) | 1 | (0.6)† | |
| Schleissheim | 1 | (0.6) | 0 | (0) | 1 | (0.6) | |
| Senftenberg | 1 | (0.6) | 0 | (0) | 1 | (0.6) | |
| untypeable | 2† | (1.3) | 3† | (1.9) | 5 | (3.2)† | |
| All serotypes | 35 | (22.5) | 21 | (13.5) | 56 | (36.1) | |
| Pigs (n = 180) | Typhimurium | 2 | (1.1) | 0 | (0) | 2 | (1.1) |
| Ohio | 0 | (0) | 1 | (0.6) | 1 | (0.6) | |
| untypeable | 1 | (0.6) | 1 | (0.6) | 2 | (1.1) | |
| All serotypes | 3 | (1.7) | 2 | (1.1) | 5 | (2.8) | |
| Cattle (n = 183) | Blockley | 1 | (0.5) | 0 | (0) | 1 | (0.5) |
| Total | 39 | (7.5) | 23 | (4.4) | 62 | (12.0) | |
a FE: First enrichment culture
bDSEC: delayed secondary enrichment culture
† Among samples, 2 harbored 2 different serotypes (Infantis and untypeable; Newport and untypeable).
Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella from food-producing animals
| Antimicrobials | Resistant breakpoint (μg/mL) | MIC range (μg/mL) | MIC50 (μg/mL) | MIC90 (μg/mL) | No. of resistant isolates (%) | |||||||
| Broiler | Pigs | Cattle | Total | |||||||||
| Ampicillin | 25 | 0.39->100 | 1.56 | 3.13 | 4 | (3.6) | 5 | (50) | 0 | (0) | 9 | (7.4) |
| Ceftiofur | 6.25 | 0.2–25 | 0.78 | 1.56 | 2 | (1.8) | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | 2 | (1.6) |
| Apramycin | 0.39–12.5 | 1.56 | 3.13 | |||||||||
| Dihydrostreptomycin | 100 | 6.25->100 | >100 | >100 | 88 | (79.3) | 6 | (60) | 1 | (100) | 95 | (77.9) |
| Kanamycin | 25 | 0.39->100 | 1.56 | >100 | 49 | (44.1) | 0 | (0) | 1 | (100) | 50 | (41.0) |
| Gentamicin | 0.1–3.13 | 0.39 | 0.78 | |||||||||
| Oxytetracycline | 25 | 3.13->100 | >100 | >100 | 93 | (83.8) | 6 | (60) | 1 | (100) | 100 | (82.0) |
| Bicozamycin | 100 | 12.5->400 | 25 | 25 | 8 | (7.2) | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | 8 | (6.6) |
| Chloramphenicol | 50 | 0.78->100 | 3.13 | 6.25 | 0 | (0) | 4 | (40) | 0 | (0) | 4 | (3.3) |
| Colistin | 0.39–3.13 | 0.78 | 1.56 | |||||||||
| Nalidixic acid | 25 | 3.13->100 | 3.13 | 6.25 | 6 | (5.4) | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | 6 | (4.9) |
| Enrofloxacin | ≤0.05–0.39 | ≤0.05 | 0.1 | |||||||||
| Ofloxacin | ≤0.05–0.78 | 0.1 | 0.2 | |||||||||
| Trimethoprim | 3.13 | 0.1–6.25 | 0.39 | 6.25 | 42 | (37.8) | 1 | (10) | 0 | (0) | 43 | (35.2) |
| Sulfadimethoxine | 100->1600 | >1600 | >1600 | |||||||||
Antimicrobial resistance patterns of S. enterica Infantis by isolation methods
| No. of antimicrobials | Antimicrobial resistance patterns a | Broilers | Total (%) | ||||
| FEb | DSECc | ||||||
| 0 | Susceptible | 2 | (5.3) | 0 | (0) | 2 | (2.9) |
| 1 | DSM | 2 | (5.3) | 0 | (0) | 2 | (2.9) |
| OTC | 2 | (5.3) | 0 | (0) | 2 | (2.9) | |
| 2 | DSM, OTC | 9 | (23.7) | 8 | (25.8) | 17 | (24.6) |
| 3 | DSM, KM, OTC | 7 | (18.4) | 2 | (6.5) | 9 | (13.0) |
| DSM, OTC, TMP | 4 | (10.5) | 2 | (6.5) | 6 | (8.7) | |
| KM, OTC, TMP | 1 | (2.6) | 0 | (0) | 1 | (1.4) | |
| 4 | DSM, KM, OTC, TMP | 11 | (28.9) | 19 | (61.3) | 30 | (43.5) |
| Total | 38 | (100) | 31 | (100) | 69 | (100) | |
a DSM: dihydrostreptomycin, KM: kanamycin, OTC: oxytetracycline, TMP: trimethoprime
b FE: First enrichment culture
c DSEC: Delayed secondary enrichment culture