Literature DB >> 19701687

Using a prediction approach to assess agreement between two continuous measurements.

Cody Hamilton1, James D Stamey.   

Abstract

The problem of assessing agreement between two devices occurs with great frequency in the medical literature. If it can be demonstrated that a new device agrees sufficiently with a device currently in use, then the new device can be approved for general use. This work discusses how a prediction interval can be used to estimate the whether a future difference between two devices will be within acceptable limits with reasonable confidence. The method is illustrated with an example involving measurements of peak expiratory flow.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19701687     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-009-9198-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  12 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Total deviation index for measuring individual agreement with applications in laboratory performance and bioequivalence.

Authors:  L I Lin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Rapid measurement of blood propofol levels: a proof of concept study.

Authors:  L McGaughran; L J Voss; R Oliver; M Petcu; P Schaare; J P M Barnard; J W Sleigh
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-05-13       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 4.  An overview on assessing agreement with continuous measurements.

Authors:  Huiman X Barnhart; Michael J Haber; Lawrence I Lin
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.051

5.  Evaluating agreement with a gold standard in method comparison studies.

Authors:  R T St Laurent
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  A two one-sided tests procedure for assessment of individual bioequivalence.

Authors:  J Liu; S C Chow
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.051

7.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.

Authors:  L I Lin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  A critical discussion of intraclass correlation coefficients.

Authors:  R Müller; P Büttner
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994 Dec 15-30       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  A simplified strategy for the estimation of the exercise ventilatory thresholds.

Authors:  J Alberto Neder; Ricardo Stein
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.411

View more
  3 in total

1.  The importance of using the correct bounds on the Bland-Altman limits of agreement when multiple measurements are recorded per patient.

Authors:  Cody Hamilton; Steven Lewis
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2010-03-21       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Baroreflex control of muscle sympathetic nerve activity: a nonpharmacological measure of baroreflex sensitivity.

Authors:  Emma C Hart; Michael J Joyner; B Gunnar Wallin; Tomas Karlsson; Timothy B Curry; Nisha Charkoudian
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 4.733

3.  Using multiple agreement methods for continuous repeated measures data: a tutorial for practitioners.

Authors:  Richard A Parker; Charles Scott; Vanda Inácio; Nathaniel T Stevens
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.615

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.