Tatjana I Jung1, Falk Hoffmann, Gerd Glaeske, Dieter Felsenberg. 1. Centre of Muscle and Bone Research (ZMK), Charité University Medicine, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 130, 12200, Berlin, Germany. tatjana.jung@charite.de
Abstract
PURPOSE: Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) presents a severe side-effect of intravenous bisphosphonate (i.v. BP) treatment; yet, the pathoethiological influence of the underlying disease which indicated that treatment remains unclear. METHODS: We studied a large register of subjects who suffered an ONJ (n = 356) under i.v. BP therapy and characterized them according to underlying diseases and BP intake. By using claims data, we analysed indications in the general public in a cohort of new users of i.v. BPs (n = 1,075) in ambulatory care. For the years 2004-2006, both data sources were compared to indirectly assess the disease-specific risk for the development of an ONJ. We further assessed disease-specific survival after treatment initiation. RESULTS: Patients with multiple myeloma were found more often, in the ONJ register, than were treated in real life (males: 36.4% vs. 16.2%; females: 27.8% vs. 6.5%) while the proportions of patients with prostate or breast cancer were as expected, and malignancies with low survival rates were strongly underrepresented. No patients with osteoporosis were reported to the ONJ register despite accounting for 18.8% of all the treated females in the general public. CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of diagnoses that indicated i.v. BP treatment in patients who suffered an ONJ is different from what would be expected when looking at indications in the general public. Each underlying disease may, hence, have its own inherent risk to develop an ONJ due to varying life-expectancies and overall oncological treatment regimes including the interval and type of i.v. BP application.
PURPOSE:Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) presents a severe side-effect of intravenous bisphosphonate (i.v. BP) treatment; yet, the pathoethiological influence of the underlying disease which indicated that treatment remains unclear. METHODS: We studied a large register of subjects who suffered an ONJ (n = 356) under i.v. BP therapy and characterized them according to underlying diseases and BP intake. By using claims data, we analysed indications in the general public in a cohort of new users of i.v. BPs (n = 1,075) in ambulatory care. For the years 2004-2006, both data sources were compared to indirectly assess the disease-specific risk for the development of an ONJ. We further assessed disease-specific survival after treatment initiation. RESULTS:Patients with multiple myeloma were found more often, in the ONJ register, than were treated in real life (males: 36.4% vs. 16.2%; females: 27.8% vs. 6.5%) while the proportions of patients with prostate or breast cancer were as expected, and malignancies with low survival rates were strongly underrepresented. No patients with osteoporosis were reported to the ONJ register despite accounting for 18.8% of all the treated females in the general public. CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of diagnoses that indicated i.v. BP treatment in patients who suffered an ONJ is different from what would be expected when looking at indications in the general public. Each underlying disease may, hence, have its own inherent risk to develop an ONJ due to varying life-expectancies and overall oncological treatment regimes including the interval and type of i.v. BP application.
Authors: Danielle A Southern; Peter D Faris; Rollin Brant; P Diane Galbraith; Colleen M Norris; Merril L Knudtson; William A Ghali Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Michele D Mignogna; Stefano Fedele; Lucio Lo Russo; Roberto Ciccarelli; Lorenzo Lo Muzio Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-03-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Estee P Wang; Leonard B Kaban; Gordon J Strewler; Noopur Raje; Maria J Troulis Journal: J Oral Maxillofac Surg Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 1.895
Authors: Sundeep Khosla; David Burr; Jane Cauley; David W Dempster; Peter R Ebeling; Dieter Felsenberg; Robert F Gagel; Vincente Gilsanz; Theresa Guise; Sreenivas Koka; Laurie K McCauley; Joan McGowan; Marc D McKee; Suresh Mohla; David G Pendrys; Lawrence G Raisz; Salvatore L Ruggiero; David M Shafer; Lillian Shum; Stuart L Silverman; Catherine H Van Poznak; Nelson Watts; Sook-Bin Woo; Elizabeth Shane Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Alberto Bedogni; Giorgia Saia; Giordana Bettini; Anita Tronchet; Andrea Totola; Giorgio Bedogni; Paolo Tregnago; Maria Teresa Valenti; Francesco Bertoldo; Giuseppe Ferronato; Pier Francesco Nocini; Stella Blandamura; Luca Dalle Carbonare Journal: Oncologist Date: 2012-06-20
Authors: Bevin C English; Caitlin E Baum; David E Adelberg; Tristan M Sissung; Paul G Kluetz; William L Dahut; Douglas K Price; William D Figg Journal: Ther Clin Risk Manag Date: 2010-11-19 Impact factor: 2.423
Authors: Gelsomina L Borromeo; Caroline Brand; John G Clement; Michael McCullough; Wendy Thomson; Elly Flitzanis; John D Wark Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2011-04-10 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Johan Bergdahl; Fredrik Jarnbring; Vera Ehrenstein; Henrik Gammelager; Fredrik Granath; Helle Kieler; Madeleine Svensson; Grethe S Tell; Ylva Trolle Lagerros Journal: Clin Epidemiol Date: 2013-01-04 Impact factor: 4.790