| Literature DB >> 19701135 |
Zhi Zeng1, Han Zhang, Tao Zhang, Shigeru Tamogami, Jie Yu Chen.
Abstract
The determination of gamma-nonalactone as one of the important odor-active compounds in freshly cooked non-scented rice is reported. It was evaluated by gas chromatography-olfactometry (GC-O) analysis and identified by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis in the headspace above the freshly cooked non-scented rice samples extracted by using a modified headspace solid-phase microextraction (SPME) method. This component had a mass spectrum with a characteristic ion peak at m/z 85 (100%) and a linear retention index (RI) of 2,023 on a DB Wax column, consistent with those of an authentic sample of gamma-nonalactone. The odor characterization of a strong, sweet, coconut-like aroma of this compound was also validated by GC-O comparison with the authentic compound.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19701135 PMCID: PMC6255368 DOI: 10.3390/molecules14082927
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Mass spectrum observed for the chromatographic peak at an RI of 2023 on a DB Wax column with a strong, sweet, coconut-like aroma in the headspace above freshly cooked Mirukiikuiin rice (A) and mass spectrum of γ-nonalactone (also known as 4-pentyl-butan-4-olide) in the Wiley mass spectral library (31309) (B).
Relative amount and odor intensity of γ-nonalactone in the headspace above the freshly cooked rice samples of three non-scented and one scented cultivars.
| Rice cultivar | Relative amount a | Odor intensity b |
|---|---|---|
| Non-scented rice | ||
| LGC-soft | 13.72±1.63 | 5.0±0.0 |
| Mirukiikuiin | 8.14±0.46 | 5.0±0.0 |
| LGC-katsu | 4.63±0.22 | 4.7±0.5 |
| Scented rice | ||
| Hieri | nd c | nd |
a Relative amount of γ-nonalactone was in TIC chromatographic peak area (area counts × 106) [22]. Results expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3); b Odor intensity values of the sweet, coconut-like aroma for the chromatographic peak at an RI of 2023 on a DB Wax column were averaged for six runs (three panelists in duplicate, 3 × 2) by GC-O (posterior intensity method) [23]. Results expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 6); c Not detected.