Literature DB >> 19700545

Comparative transcriptomic approach to investigate differences in wine yeast physiology and metabolism during fermentation.

Debra Rossouw1, Roberto Olivares-Hernandes, Jens Nielsen, Florian F Bauer.   

Abstract

Commercial wine yeast strains of the species Saccharomyces cerevisiae have been selected to satisfy many different, and sometimes highly specific, oenological requirements. As a consequence, more than 200 different strains with significantly diverging phenotypic traits are produced globally. This genetic resource has been rather neglected by the scientific community because industrial strains are less easily manipulated than the limited number of laboratory strains that have been successfully employed to investigate fundamental aspects of cellular biology. However, laboratory strains are unsuitable for the study of many phenotypes that are of significant scientific and industrial interest. Here, we investigate whether a comparative transcriptomics and phenomics approach, based on the analysis of five phenotypically diverging industrial wine yeast strains, can provide insights into the molecular networks that are responsible for the expression of such phenotypes. For this purpose, some oenologically relevant phenotypes, including resistance to various stresses, cell wall properties, and metabolite production of these strains were evaluated and aligned with transcriptomic data collected during alcoholic fermentation. The data reveal significant differences in gene regulation between the five strains. While the genetic complexity underlying the various successive stress responses in a dynamic system such as wine fermentation reveals the limits of the approach, many of the relevant differences in gene expression can be linked to specific phenotypic differences between the strains. This is, in particular, the case for many aspects of metabolic regulation. The comparative approach therefore opens new possibilities to investigate complex phenotypic traits on a molecular level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19700545      PMCID: PMC2765138          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01251-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  36 in total

1.  Clustering gene expression patterns.

Authors:  A Ben-Dor; R Shamir; Z Yakhini
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  1999 Fall-Winter       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response.

Authors:  V G Tusher; R Tibshirani; G Chu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  A new approach to decoding life: systems biology.

Authors:  T Ideker; T Galitski; L Hood
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 8.929

4.  Induction and repression of DAN1 and the family of anaerobic mannoprotein genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae occurs through a complex array of regulatory sites.

Authors:  B D Cohen; O Sertil; N E Abramova; K J Davies; C V Lowry
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  The genome-wide transcriptional responses of Saccharomyces cerevisiae grown on glucose in aerobic chemostat cultures limited for carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, or sulfur.

Authors:  Viktor M Boer; Johannes H de Winde; Jack T Pronk; Matthew D W Piper
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-10-31       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Bakers' yeast, a model for fungal biofilm formation.

Authors:  T B Reynolds; G R Fink
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-02-02       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes.

Authors:  A P Gasch; P T Spellman; C M Kao; O Carmel-Harel; M B Eisen; G Storz; D Botstein; P O Brown
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.138

8.  Three cell wall mannoproteins facilitate the uptake of iron in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  O Protchenko; T Ferea; J Rashford; J Tiedeman; P O Brown; D Botstein; C C Philpott
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-10-22       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 9.  Meeting the consumer challenge through genetically customized wine-yeast strains.

Authors:  Isak S Pretorius; Florian F Bauer
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 19.536

10.  Linking gene regulation and the exo-metabolome: a comparative transcriptomics approach to identify genes that impact on the production of volatile aroma compounds in yeast.

Authors:  Debra Rossouw; Tormod Naes; Florian F Bauer
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  16 in total

1.  Identifying and assessing the impact of wine acid-related genes in yeast.

Authors:  Boredi S Chidi; Debra Rossouw; Florian F Bauer
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.886

2.  Foldability of a Natural De Novo Evolved Protein.

Authors:  Dixie Bungard; Jacob S Copple; Jing Yan; Jimmy J Chhun; Vlad K Kumirov; Scott G Foy; Joanna Masel; Vicki H Wysocki; Matthew H J Cordes
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 5.006

3.  Transcriptional regulation and the diversification of metabolism in wine yeast strains.

Authors:  Debra Rossouw; Dan Jacobson; Florian F Bauer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Adjustment of trehalose metabolism in wine Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains to modify ethanol yields.

Authors:  D Rossouw; E H Heyns; M E Setati; S Bosch; F F Bauer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Comparative transcriptomic and proteomic profiling of industrial wine yeast strains.

Authors:  Debra Rossouw; Adri H van den Dool; Dan Jacobson; Florian F Bauer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Oxidative stress tolerance, adenylate cyclase, and autophagy are key players in the chronological life span of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during winemaking.

Authors:  Helena Orozco; Emilia Matallana; Agustín Aranda
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Genomic expression program of Saccharomyces cerevisiae along a mixed-culture wine fermentation with Hanseniaspora guilliermondii.

Authors:  Catarina Barbosa; Arlete Mendes-Faia; Patrícia Lage; Nuno P Mira; Ana Mendes-Ferreira
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 5.328

8.  Comparative transcriptomic analysis reveals similarities and dissimilarities in Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine strains response to nitrogen availability.

Authors:  Catarina Barbosa; José García-Martínez; José E Pérez-Ortín; Ana Mendes-Ferreira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Flavour-active wine yeasts.

Authors:  Antonio G Cordente; Christopher D Curtin; Cristian Varela; Isak S Pretorius
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Nonlinear fitness consequences of variation in expression level of a eukaryotic gene.

Authors:  Joshua S Rest; Christopher M Morales; John B Waldron; Dana A Opulente; Julius Fisher; Seungjae Moon; Kevin Bullaughey; Lucas B Carey; Demitri Dedousis
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.