Literature DB >> 19700467

Variation in the durations of the photoperiod-sensitive and photoperiod-insensitive phases of development to flowering among eight maturity isolines of soyabean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill].

A P Upadhyay1, R H Summerfield, R H Ellis, E H Roberts, A Qi.   

Abstract

In soyabean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] the period between sowing and flowering is comprised of three successive developmental phases--pre-inductive, inductive and post-inductive--in which the rate of development is affected, respectively, by temperature only, by photoperiod and temperature, and then again by temperature only. A reciprocal-transfer experiment (carried out at a mean temperature of 25 degrees C) in which cohorts of plants were transferred successively between short and long photoperiods and vice-versa showed that eight combinations of three pairs of maturity alleles (E(1)/e(1), E(2)/e(2), E(3)/e(3)) had their greatest effect on the duration of the inductive phase in long days. This phase was increased with the increasing photoperiod sensitivity induced by the different gene combinations, and ranged from about 27 to 54 d according to genotype. In a short day regime (11.5 h d(-1)), less than the critical photoperiod, the duration of the inductive phase was brief-requiring about 11 photoperiodic cycles in the less photoperiod-sensitive genotypes and only about seven cycles in the more sensitive ones. The maturity genes also affected the duration of the two photoperiod-insensitive phases; these durations were positively correlated with the photoperiod-sensitivity potential of the gene combinations. The largest effect was on the pre-inductive phase which varied from 3 to 11 d, while the post-inductive phase varied from about 13 to 18 d. As a consequence of these nonphotoperiodic effects of the maturity genes, even in the most inductive regimes (daylengths less than the critical photoperiod) the time taken to flower by the less photoperiod-sensitive combinations of maturity genes was somewhat less than in the more sensitive combinations-ranging from about 28 to 34 d. The genetic and practical implications of these findings are discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  1994        PMID: 19700467     DOI: 10.1093/aob/74.1.97

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  9 in total

1.  Use of field observations to characterise genotypic flowering responses to photoperiod and temperature: a soyabean exemplar.

Authors:  E H Roberts; A Qi; R H Ellis; R J Summerfield; R J Lawn; S Shanmugasundaram
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Expression of flowering-time genes in soybean E1 near-isogenic lines under short and long day conditions.

Authors:  Dhiraj Thakare; Saratha Kumudini; Randy D Dinkins
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 4.116

3.  The alleles at the E1 locus impact the expression pattern of two soybean FT-like genes shown to induce flowering in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Dhiraj Thakare; Saratha Kumudini; Randy D Dinkins
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 4.116

4.  Development and seed number in indeterminate soybean as affected by timing and duration of exposure to long photoperiods after flowering.

Authors:  Adriana G Kantolic; Gustavo A Slafer
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Using flowering times and leaf numbers to model the phases of photoperiod sensitivity in Antirrhinum majus L.

Authors:  S R Adams; M Munir; V M Valdés; F A Langton; S D Jackson
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2003-09-19       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  A recessive allele for delayed flowering at the soybean maturity locus E9 is a leaky allele of FT2a, a FLOWERING LOCUS T ortholog.

Authors:  Chen Zhao; Ryoma Takeshima; Jianghui Zhu; Meilan Xu; Masako Sato; Satoshi Watanabe; Akira Kanazawa; Baohui Liu; Fanjiang Kong; Tetsuya Yamada; Jun Abe
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 4.215

7.  Soybean fruit development and set at the node level under combined photoperiod and radiation conditions.

Authors:  Magalí Nico; Anita I Mantese; Daniel J Miralles; Adriana G Kantolic
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 6.992

8.  Characterization and quantitative trait locus mapping of late-flowering from a Thai soybean cultivar introduced into a photoperiod-insensitive genetic background.

Authors:  Fei Sun; Meilan Xu; Cheolwoo Park; Maria Stefanie Dwiyanti; Atsushi J Nagano; Jianghui Zhu; Satoshi Watanabe; Fanjiang Kong; Baohui Liu; Tetsuya Yamada; Jun Abe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A soybean quantitative trait locus that promotes flowering under long days is identified as FT5a, a FLOWERING LOCUS T ortholog.

Authors:  Ryoma Takeshima; Takafumi Hayashi; Jianghui Zhu; Chen Zhao; Meilan Xu; Naoya Yamaguchi; Takashi Sayama; Masao Ishimoto; Lingping Kong; Xinyi Shi; Baohui Liu; Zhixi Tian; Tetsuya Yamada; Fanjiang Kong; Jun Abe
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 6.992

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.