Literature DB >> 14500328

Using flowering times and leaf numbers to model the phases of photoperiod sensitivity in Antirrhinum majus L.

S R Adams1, M Munir, V M Valdés, F A Langton, S D Jackson.   

Abstract

A model has been developed that can be used to determine the phases of sensitivity to photoperiod for seedlings subjected to reciprocal transfers at regular intervals between long (LD) and short day (SD) conditions. The novel feature of this approach is that it enables the simultaneous analysis of the time to flower and number of leaves below the inflorescence. A range of antirrhinum cultivars were grown, all of which were shown to be quantitative long-day plants. Seedlings were effectively insensitive to photoperiod when very young (juvenile). However, after the end of the juvenile phase, SD delayed flowering and increased the number of leaves below the inflorescence. Plants transferred from LD to SD showed a sudden hastening of flowering and a decrease in leaf number once sufficient LD had been received for flower commitment. Photoperiod had little effect on the rate of flower development. The analysis clearly identified major cultivar differences in the length of the juvenile phase and the photoperiod-sensitive inductive phase in both LD and SD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14500328      PMCID: PMC4244858          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcg194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  2 in total

Review 1.  Improving quantitative flowering models through a better understanding of the phases of photoperiod sensitivity.

Authors:  S R Adams; S Pearson; P Hadley
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.992

2.  Variation in the durations of the photoperiod-sensitive and photoperiod-insensitive phases of development to flowering among eight maturity isolines of soyabean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill].

Authors:  A P Upadhyay; R H Summerfield; R H Ellis; E H Roberts; A Qi
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.357

  2 in total
  6 in total

1.  Juvenility and flowering of Brunonia australis (Goodeniaceae) and Calandrinia sp. (Portulacaceae) in relation to vernalization and daylength.

Authors:  Robyn L Cave; Colin J Birch; Graeme L Hammer; John E Erwin; Margaret E Johnston
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Depicting Precise Temperature and Duration of Vernalization and Inhibiting Early Bolting and Flowering of Angelica sinensis by Freezing Storage.

Authors:  Xiaoxia Liu; Mimi Luo; Mengfei Li; Jianhe Wei
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 3.  Crosstalk between Photoreceptor and Sugar Signaling Modulates Floral Signal Transduction.

Authors:  Ianis G Matsoukas
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Attainment of reproductive competence, phase transition, and quantification of juvenility in mutant genetic screens.

Authors:  Ianis G Matsoukas
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  TEMPRANILLO is a regulator of juvenility in plants.

Authors:  Tiziana Sgamma; Alison Jackson; Rosario Muleo; Brian Thomas; Andrea Massiah
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Determination of Photoperiod-Sensitive Phase in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.).

Authors:  Ketema Daba; Thomas D Warkentin; Rosalind Bueckert; Christopher D Todd; Bunyamin Tar'an
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 5.753

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.