BACKGROUND: The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Event (GRACE) risk score was developed in a large multinational registry to predict in-hospital mortality across the broad spectrum of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Because of the substantial regional variation and temporal changes in patient characteristics and management patterns, we sought to validate this risk score in a contemporary Canadian population with ACS. METHODS: The main GRACE and GRACE(2) registries are prospective, multicenter, observational studies of patients with ACS (June 1999 to December 2007). For each patient, we calculated the GRACE risk score and evaluated its discrimination and calibration by the c statistic and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, respectively. To assess the impact of temporal changes in management on the GRACE risk score performance, we evaluated its discrimination and calibration after stratifying the study population into prespecified subgroups according to enrollment period, type of ACS, and whether the patient underwent coronary angiography or revascularization during index hospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 12,242 Canadian patients with ACS were included; the median GRACE risk score was 127 (25th and 75th percentiles were 103 and 157, respectively). Overall, the GRACE risk score demonstrated excellent discrimination (c statistic 0.84, 95% CI 0.82-0.86, P < .001) for in-hospital mortality. Similar results were seen in all the subgroups (all c statistics >/=0.8). However, calibration was suboptimal overall (Hosmer-Lemeshow P = .06) and in various subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: GRACE risk score is a valid and powerful predictor of adverse outcomes across the wide range of Canadian patients with ACS. Its excellent discrimination is maintained despite advances in management over time and is evident in all patient subgroups. However, the predicted probability of in-hospital mortality may require recalibration in the specific health care setting and with advancements in treatment.
BACKGROUND: The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Event (GRACE) risk score was developed in a large multinational registry to predict in-hospital mortality across the broad spectrum of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Because of the substantial regional variation and temporal changes in patient characteristics and management patterns, we sought to validate this risk score in a contemporary Canadian population with ACS. METHODS: The main GRACE and GRACE(2) registries are prospective, multicenter, observational studies of patients with ACS (June 1999 to December 2007). For each patient, we calculated the GRACE risk score and evaluated its discrimination and calibration by the c statistic and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, respectively. To assess the impact of temporal changes in management on the GRACE risk score performance, we evaluated its discrimination and calibration after stratifying the study population into prespecified subgroups according to enrollment period, type of ACS, and whether the patient underwent coronary angiography or revascularization during index hospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 12,242 Canadian patients with ACS were included; the median GRACE risk score was 127 (25th and 75th percentiles were 103 and 157, respectively). Overall, the GRACE risk score demonstrated excellent discrimination (c statistic 0.84, 95% CI 0.82-0.86, P < .001) for in-hospital mortality. Similar results were seen in all the subgroups (all c statistics >/=0.8). However, calibration was suboptimal overall (Hosmer-Lemeshow P = .06) and in various subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: GRACE risk score is a valid and powerful predictor of adverse outcomes across the wide range of Canadian patients with ACS. Its excellent discrimination is maintained despite advances in management over time and is evident in all patient subgroups. However, the predicted probability of in-hospital mortality may require recalibration in the specific health care setting and with advancements in treatment.
Authors: C Eick; M Duckheim; P Groga-Bada; N Klumpp; S Mannes; C S Zuern; M Gawaz; K D Rizas; Axel Bauer Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2017-03-22 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Joshua James Oliver; Matthew Jay Streitz; Jessica Marie Hyams; Richard Michael Wood; Yevgeniy Mikhaylovich Maksimenko; Brit Long; Robert Michael Barnwell; Michael David April Journal: Intern Emerg Med Date: 2018-03-06 Impact factor: 3.397
Authors: Phillip R Anderson; Prospero B Gogo; Bina Ahmed; Faye Straight; Edward F Terrien; Matthew W Watkins; Nader El Gharib; Harold L Dauerman Journal: J Thromb Thrombolysis Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 2.300
Authors: Osman Can Yontar; Guney Erdogan; Mustafa Yenercag; Sefa Gul; Ugur Arslan; Ali Karagoz Journal: Acta Cardiol Sin Date: 2021-11 Impact factor: 2.672
Authors: Matthew Jay Streitz; Joshua James Oliver; Jessica Marie Hyams; Richard Michael Wood; Yevgeniy Mikhaylovich Maksimenko; Brit Long; Robert Michael Barnwell; Michael David April Journal: Intern Emerg Med Date: 2017-09-11 Impact factor: 3.397