Literature DB >> 19699711

Unambiguous determination of isobaric histone modifications by reversed-phase retention time and high-mass accuracy.

Lanhao Yang1, Shengjiang Tu, Chen Ren, Esther M M Bulloch, Chung-Lin Liao, Ming-Daw Tsai, Michael A Freitas.   

Abstract

Methylation and acetylation of lysines are crucial posttranslational modifications that regulate gene transcription and have been shown to be misregulated in many forms of cancers. Western blot, immunoprecipitation, and immunofluorescence are commonly used to characterize histone acetylation and methylation. However, these approaches are limited by the availability, site specificity, and cross-reactivity of antibodies. Mass spectrometry is emerging as an additional powerful tool for histone characterization. The isobaric nature of trimethylation and acetylation (42.0470 and 42.0106 Da, respectively) confounds histone characterization by means other than high-resolution/high-mass accuracy mass spectrometry. In this study, we adapted methodology that exploits difference in the relative retention time of acetylated and methylated peptides to unequivocally distinguish between these two modifications even with low-mass accuracy mass spectrometers. The approach was tested on tryptic digest of Saccharomyces cerevisiae histones. We found that acetylation resulted in increased retention in reversed-phase chromatography, whereas methylation, including trimethylation, showed little change in retention. For example, the acetylated forms of peptide (27)KSAPSTGGVKKPHR(40) eluted at 15.63 min, whereas the methylated forms eluted at 13.89 min. In addition, the effect of acetylation was cumulative as observed in the case of peptide (9)KSTGGKAPR(17), whose unmodified, monoacetylated, and diacetylated isoforms eluted at 7.43, 10.47, and 16.49 min, respectively. The modification patterns of the peptides in question were subsequently verified by high-mass accuracy tandem mass spectrometry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19699711      PMCID: PMC2787863          DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2009.08.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Biochem        ISSN: 0003-2697            Impact factor:   3.365


  50 in total

1.  Partitioning and plasticity of repressive histone methylation states in mammalian chromatin.

Authors:  Antoine H F M Peters; Stefan Kubicek; Karl Mechtler; Roderick J O'Sullivan; Alwin A H A Derijck; Laura Perez-Burgos; Alexander Kohlmaier; Susanne Opravil; Makoto Tachibana; Yoichi Shinkai; Joost H A Martens; Thomas Jenuwein
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Proteome analyses using accurate mass and elution time peptide tags with capillary LC time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Eric F Strittmatter; P Lee Ferguson; Keqi Tang; Richard D Smith
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Protein mass analysis of histones.

Authors:  Scott C Galasinski; Katheryn A Resing; Natalie G Ahn
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.608

4.  Novel linear quadrupole ion trap/FT mass spectrometer: performance characterization and use in the comparative analysis of histone H3 post-translational modifications.

Authors:  John E P Syka; Jarrod A Marto; Dina L Bai; Stevan Horning; Michael W Senko; Jae C Schwartz; Beatrix Ueberheide; Benjamin Garcia; Scott Busby; Tara Muratore; Jeffrey Shabanowitz; Donald F Hunt
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry profiling of histones.

Authors:  Xiaodan Su; Naduparambil K Jacob; Ravindra Amunugama; David M Lucas; Amy R Knapp; Chen Ren; Melanie E Davis; Guido Marcucci; Mark R Parthun; John C Byrd; Richard Fishel; Michael A Freitas
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2007-01-07       Impact factor: 3.205

6.  Chemical derivatization of histones for facilitated analysis by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Benjamin A Garcia; Sahana Mollah; Beatrix M Ueberheide; Scott A Busby; Tara L Muratore; Jeffrey Shabanowitz; Donald F Hunt
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.491

7.  Peptide mass mapping of acetylated isoforms of histone H4 from mouse lymphosarcoma cells treated with histone deacetylase (HDACs) inhibitors.

Authors:  Chen Ren; Liwen Zhang; Michael A Freitas; Kalpana Ghoshal; Mark R Parthun; Samson T Jacob
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.109

8.  SIRT1 deacetylation and repression of p300 involves lysine residues 1020/1024 within the cell cycle regulatory domain 1.

Authors:  Toula Bouras; Maofu Fu; Anthony A Sauve; Fang Wang; Andrew A Quong; Neil D Perkins; Ronald T Hay; Wei Gu; Richard G Pestell
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-01-04       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Differentiation between peptides containing acetylated or tri-methylated lysines by mass spectrometry: an application for determining lysine 9 acetylation and methylation of histone H3.

Authors:  Kangling Zhang; Peter M Yau; Bhaskar Chandrasekhar; Ron New; Richard Kondrat; Brian S Imai; Morton E Bradbury
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.984

10.  Identification of histone demethylases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Shengjiang Tu; Esther M M Bulloch; Lanhao Yang; Chen Ren; Wei-Chieh Huang; Pang-Hung Hsu; Chein-Hung Chen; Chung-Lin Liao; Hui-Ming Yu; Wan-Sheng Lo; Michael A Freitas; Ming-Daw Tsai
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-03-16       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Chemical and biochemical approaches in the study of histone methylation and demethylation.

Authors:  Keqin Kathy Li; Cheng Luo; Dongxia Wang; Hualiang Jiang; Y George Zheng
Journal:  Med Res Rev       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 12.944

2.  EpiProfile 2.0: A Computational Platform for Processing Epi-Proteomics Mass Spectrometry Data.

Authors:  Zuo-Fei Yuan; Simone Sidoli; Dylan M Marchione; Johayra Simithy; Kevin A Janssen; Mary R Szurgot; Benjamin A Garcia
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 3.  Integrating Proteomics and Targeted Metabolomics to Understand Global Changes in Histone Modifications.

Authors:  Johayra Simithy; Simone Sidoli; Benjamin A Garcia
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 3.984

4.  Small-molecule-based inhibition of histone demethylation in cells assessed by quantitative mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Mukram M Mackeen; Holger B Kramer; Kai-Hsuan Chang; Matthew L Coleman; Richard J Hopkinson; Christopher J Schofield; Benedikt M Kessler
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  Reliable determination of site-specific in vivo protein N-glycosylation based on collision-induced MS/MS and chromatographic retention time.

Authors:  Benlian Wang; Yaroslav Tsybovsky; Krzysztof Palczewski; Mark R Chance
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.109

6.  A quantitative analysis of histone methylation and acetylation isoforms from their deuteroacetylated derivatives: application to a series of knockout mutants.

Authors:  Katherine L Fiedler; Poonam Bheda; Junbiao Dai; Jef D Boeke; Cynthia Wolberger; Robert J Cotter
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.982

7.  Discovery of histone modification crosstalk networks by stable isotope labeling of amino acids in cell culture mass spectrometry (SILAC MS).

Authors:  Xiaoyan Guan; Neha Rastogi; Mark R Parthun; Michael A Freitas
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 5.911

8.  Cis-existence of H3K27me3 and H3K36me2 in mouse embryonic stem cells revealed by specific ions of isobaric modification chromatogram.

Authors:  Hailei Mao; Gang Han; Longyong Xu; Duming Zhu; Hanqing Lin; Xiongwen Cao; Yi Yu; Charlie Degui Chen
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 6.832

9.  High resolution is not a strict requirement for characterization and quantification of histone post-translational modifications.

Authors:  Kelly R Karch; Barry M Zee; Benjamin A Garcia
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  Analysis of histone post translational modifications in primary monocyte derived macrophages using reverse phase×reverse phase chromatography in conjunction with porous graphitic carbon stationary phase.

Authors:  Thomas C Minshull; Joby Cole; David H Dockrell; Robert C Read; Mark J Dickman
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 4.759

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.