Literature DB >> 19699474

Computational simulations of the Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I acting on microcrystalline cellulose Ibeta: the enzyme-substrate complex.

Linghao Zhong1, James F Matthews, Peter I Hansen, Michael F Crowley, Joseph M Cleary, Ross C Walker, Mark R Nimlos, Charles L Brooks, William S Adney, Michael E Himmel, John W Brady.   

Abstract

Cellobiohydrolases are the dominant components of the commercially relevant Trichoderma reesei cellulase system. Although natural cellulases can totally hydrolyze crystalline cellulose to soluble sugars, the current enzyme loadings and long digestion times required render these enzymes less than cost effective for biomass conversion processes. It is clear that cellobiohydrolases must be improved via protein engineering to reduce processing costs. To better understand cellobiohydrolase function, new simulations have been conducted using charmm of cellobiohydrolase I (CBH I) from T.reesei interacting with a model segment (cellodextrin) of a cellulose microfibril in which one chain from the substrate has been placed into the active site tunnel mimicking the hypothesized configuration prior to final substrate docking (i.e., the +1 and +2 sites are unoccupied), which is also the structure following a catalytic bond scission. No tendency was found for the protein to dissociate from or translate along the substrate surface during this initial simulation, nor to align with the direction of the cellulose chains. However, a tendency for the decrystallized cellodextrin to partially re-anneal into the cellulose surface hints that the arbitrary starting configuration selected was not ideal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19699474     DOI: 10.1016/j.carres.2009.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carbohydr Res        ISSN: 0008-6215            Impact factor:   2.104


  13 in total

1.  Computational investigation of glycosylation effects on a family 1 carbohydrate-binding module.

Authors:  Courtney B Taylor; M Faiz Talib; Clare McCabe; Lintao Bu; William S Adney; Michael E Himmel; Michael F Crowley; Gregg T Beckham
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  An ascomycota coculture in batch bioreactor is better than polycultures for cellulase production.

Authors:  Christian Hernández; Adriane M F Milagres; Gerardo Vázquez-Marrufo; Karla María Muñoz-Páez; José Antonio García-Pérez; Enrique Alarcón
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.099

3.  Multiple functions of aromatic-carbohydrate interactions in a processive cellulase examined with molecular simulation.

Authors:  Christina M Payne; Yannick J Bomble; Courtney B Taylor; Clare McCabe; Michael E Himmel; Michael F Crowley; Gregg T Beckham
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  The O-glycosylated linker from the Trichoderma reesei Family 7 cellulase is a flexible, disordered protein.

Authors:  Gregg T Beckham; Yannick J Bomble; James F Matthews; Courtney B Taylor; Michael G Resch; John M Yarbrough; Steve R Decker; Lintao Bu; Xiongce Zhao; Clare McCabe; Jakob Wohlert; Malin Bergenstråhle; John W Brady; William S Adney; Michael E Himmel; Michael F Crowley
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Carbohydrate force fields.

Authors:  B Lachele Foley; Matthew B Tessier; Robert J Woods
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci       Date:  2012-07

6.  Small angle neutron scattering reveals pH-dependent conformational changes in Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I: implications for enzymatic activity.

Authors:  Sai Venkatesh Pingali; Hugh M O'Neill; Joseph McGaughey; Volker S Urban; Caroline S Rempe; Loukas Petridis; Jeremy C Smith; Barbara R Evans; William T Heller
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Access to cellulose limits the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis: the role of amorphogenesis.

Authors:  Valdeir Arantes; Jack N Saddler
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 6.040

8.  Two structurally discrete GH7-cellobiohydrolases compete for the same cellulosic substrate fiber.

Authors:  Fernando Segato; André R L Damasio; Thiago Augusto Gonçalves; Mario T Murakami; Fabio M Squina; Mariadelourdestm Polizeli; Andrew J Mort; Rolf A Prade
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 6.040

9.  Probing carbohydrate product expulsion from a processive cellulase with multiple absolute binding free energy methods.

Authors:  Lintao Bu; Gregg T Beckham; Michael R Shirts; Mark R Nimlos; William S Adney; Michael E Himmel; Michael F Crowley
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Hypocrea jecorina CEL6A protein engineering.

Authors:  Suzanne E Lantz; Frits Goedegebuur; Ronald Hommes; Thijs Kaper; Bradley R Kelemen; Colin Mitchinson; Louise Wallace; Jerry Ståhlberg; Edmundo A Larenas
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 6.040

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.