Literature DB >> 19698052

Quantification of holmium:yttrium aluminum garnet optical tip degradation.

Adam C Mues1, Joel M H Teichman, Bodo E Knudsen.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Optical laser fibers are utilized to transmit energy to the surface of a stone during holmium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Ho:YAG) laser lithotripsy. During lithotripsy, fiber tip degradation (burn back) can occur. Fiber burn back may diminish fragmentation efficiency, increase operative time, and increase cost because of fiber replacement. We hypothesize that fiber tip degradation (burn back) varies among different commercially available Ho:YAG laser fibers.
METHODS: Fibers of varying core diameter sizes for Ho:YAG lithotripsy were evaluated from different manufacturers. Fibers were cleaved, stripped, polished, and inspected for tip uniformity. Fibers were initially tested without contact followed by contact testing using artificial Bego stones. Pre- and postcontact energy outputs were measured by energy detector. Distal tip degradation (burn back) was measured by digital micrometer. Testing was performed on two Ho:YAG lasers (Lumenis VersaPulse 100W and Dornier Medilas H20). All fibers were tested while submerged in water.
RESULTS: No burn back was observed in any fiber tested in still water (without contact). Before and after lithotripsy, a trend existed with fibers demonstrating high burn back and high preablation energy outputs. The majority of these fibers were <300 microm diameter. Conversely, fibers with low burn back showed low preablation energy outputs and were >300 microm diameter.
CONCLUSION: Fiber burn back and energy transmission varied among the fibers tested. Burn back only occurred during lithotripsy. Burn back may be reduced by fiber selection or using low pulse energy. Fiber burn back may affect the efficiency of fragmentation and contribute to decreased longevity of the fiber.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19698052     DOI: 10.1089/end.2009.0384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  14 in total

1.  Impact of pulse duration on Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy: treatment aspects on the single-pulse level.

Authors:  Ronald Sroka; Thomas Pongratz; Gabriel Scheib; Wael Khoder; Christian G Stief; Thomas Herrmann; Udo Nagele; Markus J Bader
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Burnback: the role of pulse duration and energy on fiber-tip degradation during high-power laser lithotripsy.

Authors:  Brandon A Levin; Ali H Aldoukhi; Kristian M Black; Timothy L Hall; William W Roberts; Khurshid R Ghani
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Impact of laser fiber tip cleavage on power output for ureteroscopy and stone treatment.

Authors:  M Haddad; E Emiliani; Y Rouchausse; F Coste; L Berthe; S Doizi; S Buttice; B Somani; O Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Update on lasers in urology 2014: current assessment on holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser lithotripter settings and laser fibers.

Authors:  Peter Kronenberg; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Optimizing use of the holmium:YAG laser for surgical management of urinary lithiasis.

Authors:  Abhishek P Patel; Bodo E Knudsen
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  A Comparative in Vitro Study of Power Output Deterioration over Time Between Ho:YAG Laser Fibers from Different Manufacturers as a Function of Deflection and Power Input.

Authors:  Andreas Bourdoumis; Panagiotis Christopoulos; Nirmal Raj; Artemis Fedder; Noor Buchholz
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2016-02-10

Review 7.  Intracorporeal lithotripsy.

Authors:  Peter Alken
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Comparison of laser fiber degradation and perioperative outcomes following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate using 550 and 1000 µm fiber diameters.

Authors:  Charles U Nottingham; Tim Large; Joshua Heiman; Chanel A Stephens; Amy E Krambeck
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Basic and advanced technological evolution of laser lithotripsy over the past decade: An educational review by the European Society of Urotechnology Section of the European Association of Urology.

Authors:  Lazaros Tzelves; Bhaskar Somani; Marinos Berdempes; Titos Markopoulos; Andreas Skolarikos
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2021-05

10.  Numerical Response Surfaces of Volume of Ablation and Retropulsion Amplitude by Settings of Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripter.

Authors:  Jian J Zhang; Jonathan Rutherford; Metasebya Solomon; Brian Cheng; Jason R Xuan; Jason Gong; Honggang Yu; Michael L D Xia; Xirong Yang; Thomas Hasenberg; Sean Curran
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.