Literature DB >> 19696442

Effectiveness of treatments for severe sepsis: a prospective, multicenter, observational study.

Ricard Ferrer1, Antonio Artigas, David Suarez, Eduardo Palencia, Mitchell M Levy, Angel Arenzana, Xose Luis Pérez, Josep-Maria Sirvent.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Several Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines recommendations are reevaluated.
OBJECTIVES: To analyze the effectiveness of treatments recommended in the sepsis guidelines.
METHODS: In a prospective observational study, we studied all adult patients with severe sepsis from 77 intensive care units. We recorded compliance with four therapeutic goals (central venous pressure 8 mm Hg or greater for persistent hypotension despite fluid resuscitation and/or lactate greater than 36 mg/dl, central venous oxygen saturation 70% or greater for persistent hypotension despite fluid resuscitation and/or lactate greater than 36 mg/dl, blood glucose greater than or equal to the lower limit of normal but less than 150 mg/dl, and inspiratory plateau pressure less than 30 cm H(2)O for mechanically ventilated patients) and four treatments (early broad-spectrum antibiotics, fluid challenge in the event of hypotension and/or lactate greater than 36 mg/dl, low-dose steroids for septic shock, drotrecogin alfa [activated] for multiorgan failure). The primary outcome measure was hospital mortality. The effectiveness of each treatment was estimated using propensity scores.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 2,796 patients, 41.6% died before hospital discharge. Treatments associated with lower hospital mortality were early broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment (treatment within 1 hour vs. no treatment within first 6 hours of diagnosis; odds ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.90; P = 0.008) and drotrecogin alfa (activated) (odds ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.84; P = 0.004). Fluid challenge and low-dose steroids showed no benefits.
CONCLUSIONS: In severe sepsis, early administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics in all patients and administration of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in the most severe patients reduce mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19696442     DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200812-1912OC

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  110 in total

Review 1.  [Results of studies in critical care medicine in the year 2009 : update].

Authors:  M Bernhard; G Marx; K Weismüller; C Lichtenstern; K Mayer; F M Brunkhorst; M A Weigand
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  Update on acute lung injury and critical care medicine 2009.

Authors:  Michael A Matthay; Steven Idell
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  [New sepsis guidelines yet again: is that necessary?].

Authors:  R Rossaint
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Results from the National Sepsis Practice Survey: use of drotrecogin α (activated) and other therapeutic decisions.

Authors:  James M O'Brien; Scott K Aberegg; Naeem A Ali; Gregory B Diette; Stanley Lemeshow
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 3.425

5.  Predictors of insufficient amikacin peak concentration in critically ill patients receiving a 25 mg/kg total body weight regimen.

Authors:  Etienne de Montmollin; Lila Bouadma; Nathalie Gault; Bruno Mourvillier; Eric Mariotte; Sarah Chemam; Laurent Massias; Emmanuelle Papy; Florence Tubach; Michel Wolff; Romain Sonneville
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  The new trials of early goal-directed resuscitation: three-part harmony or disharmony?

Authors:  James A Russell; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  The potential for PCR based testing to improve diagnosis and treatment of sepsis.

Authors:  Ngan Lyle; John Boyd
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.725

8.  What can be expected from antimicrobial de-escalation in the critically ill?

Authors:  Marin H Kollef
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Early antimicrobial therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  Anand Kumar
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.725

10.  Low-dose steroids in adult septic shock: results of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign.

Authors:  Brian Casserly; Herwig Gerlach; Gary S Phillips; Stanley Lemeshow; John C Marshall; Tiffany M Osborn; Mitchell M Levy
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.