Mitsuhiro Tozaki1, Eisuke Fukuma. 1. Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Breast Center, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, Chiba 296-8602, Japan. e-tozaki@keh.biglobe.ne.jp
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to determine whether proton ((1)H) MR spectroscopy (MRS) and diffusion-weighted imaging might be useful tools for characterizing breast lesions before biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-voxel (1)H MRS and diffusion-weighted imaging were performed in 171 suspicious or highly suspicious lesions. Using the residual water signal as a reference (4.7 ppm), a choline peak at 3.22-3.23 ppm was defined as malignant. If a high-signal-intensity lesion was detected in high-b-value (b = 1,500 s/mm(2)) images, that lesion was defined as positive for malignancy. Among the patients with positive results on diffusion-weighted imaging, the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the mass or focus were calculated from two different gradient factors (b(1) = 500 s/mm(2) and b(2) = 1,500 s/mm(2)). RESULTS: The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of (1)H MRS were 44% (40/91) and 85% (68/80), respectively (p < 0.001). If (1)H MRS was applied for mass lesions larger than 15 mm, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 82% (28/34) and 69% (11/16), respectively. Of the high-b-value images, 24 benign lesions and eight nonmass ductal carcinoma in situ were visually negative. With the use of a cutoff ADC value of 1.13 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, a specificity of 67% (43/64) and sensitivity of 97% (61/63) was obtained on diffusion-weighted imaging. CONCLUSION: (1)H MRS was useful for characterizing breast lesions measuring 15 mm or larger, and diffusion-weighted imaging was useful for characterizing lesions of any size. However, these two techniques still have potential pitfalls in relation to the diagnosis of nonmass breast lesions.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to determine whether proton ((1)H) MR spectroscopy (MRS) and diffusion-weighted imaging might be useful tools for characterizing breast lesions before biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-voxel (1)H MRS and diffusion-weighted imaging were performed in 171 suspicious or highly suspicious lesions. Using the residual water signal as a reference (4.7 ppm), a choline peak at 3.22-3.23 ppm was defined as malignant. If a high-signal-intensity lesion was detected in high-b-value (b = 1,500 s/mm(2)) images, that lesion was defined as positive for malignancy. Among the patients with positive results on diffusion-weighted imaging, the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the mass or focus were calculated from two different gradient factors (b(1) = 500 s/mm(2) and b(2) = 1,500 s/mm(2)). RESULTS: The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of (1)H MRS were 44% (40/91) and 85% (68/80), respectively (p < 0.001). If (1)H MRS was applied for mass lesions larger than 15 mm, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 82% (28/34) and 69% (11/16), respectively. Of the high-b-value images, 24 benign lesions and eight nonmass ductal carcinoma in situ were visually negative. With the use of a cutoff ADC value of 1.13 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, a specificity of 67% (43/64) and sensitivity of 97% (61/63) was obtained on diffusion-weighted imaging. CONCLUSION: (1)H MRS was useful for characterizing breast lesions measuring 15 mm or larger, and diffusion-weighted imaging was useful for characterizing lesions of any size. However, these two techniques still have potential pitfalls in relation to the diagnosis of nonmass breast lesions.
Authors: M D Dorrius; R M Pijnappel; M C van der Weide Jansen; L Jansen; P Kappert; M Oudkerk; P E Sijens Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-11-11 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Ryan Brown; Pippa Storey; Christian Geppert; KellyAnne McGorty; Ana Paula Klautau Leite; James Babb; Daniel K Sodickson; Graham C Wiggins; Linda Moy Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2013-10-07 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Sana Parsian; Habib Rahbar; Kimberly H Allison; Wendy B Demartini; Matthew L Olson; Constance D Lehman; Savannah C Partridge Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-10-02 Impact factor: 11.105