Literature DB >> 19696300

1H MR spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast: are they useful tools for characterizing breast lesions before biopsy?

Mitsuhiro Tozaki1, Eisuke Fukuma.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to determine whether proton ((1)H) MR spectroscopy (MRS) and diffusion-weighted imaging might be useful tools for characterizing breast lesions before biopsy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-voxel (1)H MRS and diffusion-weighted imaging were performed in 171 suspicious or highly suspicious lesions. Using the residual water signal as a reference (4.7 ppm), a choline peak at 3.22-3.23 ppm was defined as malignant. If a high-signal-intensity lesion was detected in high-b-value (b = 1,500 s/mm(2)) images, that lesion was defined as positive for malignancy. Among the patients with positive results on diffusion-weighted imaging, the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the mass or focus were calculated from two different gradient factors (b(1) = 500 s/mm(2) and b(2) = 1,500 s/mm(2)).
RESULTS: The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of (1)H MRS were 44% (40/91) and 85% (68/80), respectively (p < 0.001). If (1)H MRS was applied for mass lesions larger than 15 mm, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 82% (28/34) and 69% (11/16), respectively. Of the high-b-value images, 24 benign lesions and eight nonmass ductal carcinoma in situ were visually negative. With the use of a cutoff ADC value of 1.13 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, a specificity of 67% (43/64) and sensitivity of 97% (61/63) was obtained on diffusion-weighted imaging.
CONCLUSION: (1)H MRS was useful for characterizing breast lesions measuring 15 mm or larger, and diffusion-weighted imaging was useful for characterizing lesions of any size. However, these two techniques still have potential pitfalls in relation to the diagnosis of nonmass breast lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19696300     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.08.2128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  35 in total

1.  The added value of quantitative multi-voxel MR spectroscopy in breast magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M D Dorrius; R M Pijnappel; M C van der Weide Jansen; L Jansen; P Kappert; M Oudkerk; P E Sijens
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Breast MRI at 7 Tesla with a bilateral coil and robust fat suppression.

Authors:  Ryan Brown; Pippa Storey; Christian Geppert; KellyAnne McGorty; Ana Paula Klautau Leite; James Babb; Daniel K Sodickson; Graham C Wiggins; Linda Moy
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  Effect of b value and pre-admission of contrast on diagnostic accuracy of 1.5-T breast DWI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Monique D Dorrius; Hildebrand Dijkstra; Matthijs Oudkerk; Paul E Sijens
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Differential diagnosis between malignant and benign breast lesions using single-voxel proton MRS: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dongzhi Cen; Li Xu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Diffusion-weighted imaging: determination of the best pair of b-values to discriminate breast lesions.

Authors:  L Nogueira; S Brandão; E Matos; R G Nunes; J Loureiro; H A Ferreira; I Ramos
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  In vivo post-contrast 1H-MRS evaluation of malignant and benign breast lesions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jieying Tan; Li Xu; Wenqing Yao; Yun Wan; Shuqin Zhou; Sherman Xuegang Xin
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-09-27

7.  1H-MR spectroscopy of suspicious breast mass lesions at 3T: a clinical experience.

Authors:  Stefania Montemezzi; Carlo Cavedon; Lucia Camera; Gabriele Meliadò; Francesca Caumo; Ilaria Baglio; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Diffusion weighted MRI and spectroscopy in invasive carcinoma of the breast at 3Tesla. Correlation with dynamic contrast enhancement and pathologic findings.

Authors:  G Boulogianni; I Chryssogonidis; A Drevelegas
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 0.471

9.  Nonmalignant breast lesions: ADCs of benign and high-risk subtypes assessed as false-positive at dynamic enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Sana Parsian; Habib Rahbar; Kimberly H Allison; Wendy B Demartini; Matthew L Olson; Constance D Lehman; Savannah C Partridge
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Current Status and Future Prospects of Proton MR Spectroscopy of the Breast with a 1.5T MR Unit.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Tozaki; Katsuya Maruyama
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2010-09-26       Impact factor: 4.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.